MJ Cole - Sincere (Nero Remix)
Moderators: dubway, wub, seckle, fractal, joe muggs, badger, pete bubonic
Forum rules
New members: By using this site you acknowledge that you have read, understood and agreed to our terms of use. Click HERE to read them. If you do not agree to our terms of use, you must exit the site immediately. All members must also fully comply with our forum rules while accessing and using the site. Click HERE to read them.
New members: By using this site you acknowledge that you have read, understood and agreed to our terms of use. Click HERE to read them. If you do not agree to our terms of use, you must exit the site immediately. All members must also fully comply with our forum rules while accessing and using the site. Click HERE to read them.
by string » Sun Jun 21, 2009 8:17 pm
NERO - Dan wrote:String wrote:NERO - Dan wrote:String wrote:NERO - Dan wrote:String wrote:NERO - Dan wrote:THE-VOICE-OF-REASON wrote:Fucking hell they raped that tune , Nero make music that's the lowest common denominator. Funny thing is that their wobble at 170 is considered shit but their wobble at 140 is considered innovative!?!
In what way is that bass a wobble?
Pretty obvious its just generic wobble pattern
What is a wobble?
You've made dnb for long enough, i know you know what it is!
Well I'd say its usually a square wave with a 'squeltchy' resonant lfo on it playing a pattern that accentuates the feeling of wobbling around. I think what you're doing is confusing lfo with wobble. Or do you think that synthesizers should start replacing lfo with the word 'wobble'?
yeah I think it should be replaced with the word 'wobble', just so that all good producers know to keep the fuck away from it
hahahahahaha i cant believe you said that dude, that's the most ridiculous statement I've seen on this forum. Filters are a crucial part of subtractive synthesis, LFOs on filters equally as important and widely used since the dawn of synthesizers. You're basically writing off the majority of electronic music.
wow you exposed my lack of knowledge on production! but you'd think with all that knowledge you have you'd be able to make a decent tune
- string
- Posts: 717
- Joined: Thu Oct 16, 2008 2:07 pm
by rob sparx » Mon Jun 22, 2009 9:48 am
String wrote:NERO - Dan wrote:String wrote:NERO - Dan wrote:String wrote:NERO - Dan wrote:String wrote:NERO - Dan wrote:THE-VOICE-OF-REASON wrote:Fucking hell they raped that tune , Nero make music that's the lowest common denominator. Funny thing is that their wobble at 170 is considered shit but their wobble at 140 is considered innovative!?!
In what way is that bass a wobble?
Pretty obvious its just generic wobble pattern
What is a wobble?
You've made dnb for long enough, i know you know what it is!
Well I'd say its usually a square wave with a 'squeltchy' resonant lfo on it playing a pattern that accentuates the feeling of wobbling around. I think what you're doing is confusing lfo with wobble. Or do you think that synthesizers should start replacing lfo with the word 'wobble'?
yeah I think it should be replaced with the word 'wobble', just so that all good producers know to keep the fuck away from it
hahahahahaha i cant believe you said that dude, that's the most ridiculous statement I've seen on this forum. Filters are a crucial part of subtractive synthesis, LFOs on filters equally as important and widely used since the dawn of synthesizers. You're basically writing off the majority of electronic music.
wow you exposed my lack of knowledge on production! but you'd think with all that knowledge you have you'd be able to make a decent tune
There's no wobble in this tune - if there was I think Nero would have recieved death threats by now lol!
So you think we should all stay away from wobble then - what about tunes like Mystikz Haunted then? You are full of shit
Last edited by rob sparx on Mon Jun 22, 2009 10:00 am, edited 1 time in total.
- rob sparx
- Posts: 1164
- Joined: Tue May 13, 2008 11:52 pm
- Location: Leicester
by dubstee » Mon Jun 22, 2009 10:35 am
Rob Sparx wrote:There's no wobble in this tune - if there was I think Nero would have recieved death threats by now lol!
So you think we should all stay away from wobble then - what about tunes like Mystikz Haunted then? You are full of shit
When people are talking about wobble in this thread I think they are referring to the triplets bass pattern, which is as overused as LFO lines in some parts of dubstep at the moment (and for the past god knows how long).
Haunted was made 4 years ago, not sure why people are still ripping it off tbh.
- dubstee
- Posts: 242
- Joined: Fri Dec 30, 2005 9:08 pm
by dubstee » Mon Jun 22, 2009 10:46 am
bandshell wrote:People are always going to rip off something good, doesn't matter how old it is.
You'd think that when planning a rip off of another tune you'd try to pick one that hasn't been ripped off 1000 times already? But then I guess these wobble/triplet producers don't have much imagination.
- dubstee
- Posts: 242
- Joined: Fri Dec 30, 2005 9:08 pm
by string » Mon Jun 22, 2009 12:01 pm
Rob Sparx wrote:String wrote:NERO - Dan wrote:String wrote:NERO - Dan wrote:String wrote:NERO - Dan wrote:String wrote:NERO - Dan wrote:THE-VOICE-OF-REASON wrote:Fucking hell they raped that tune , Nero make music that's the lowest common denominator. Funny thing is that their wobble at 170 is considered shit but their wobble at 140 is considered innovative!?!
In what way is that bass a wobble?
Pretty obvious its just generic wobble pattern
What is a wobble?
You've made dnb for long enough, i know you know what it is!
Well I'd say its usually a square wave with a 'squeltchy' resonant lfo on it playing a pattern that accentuates the feeling of wobbling around. I think what you're doing is confusing lfo with wobble. Or do you think that synthesizers should start replacing lfo with the word 'wobble'?
yeah I think it should be replaced with the word 'wobble', just so that all good producers know to keep the fuck away from it
hahahahahaha i cant believe you said that dude, that's the most ridiculous statement I've seen on this forum. Filters are a crucial part of subtractive synthesis, LFOs on filters equally as important and widely used since the dawn of synthesizers. You're basically writing off the majority of electronic music.
wow you exposed my lack of knowledge on production! but you'd think with all that knowledge you have you'd be able to make a decent tune
There's no wobble in this tune - if there was I think Nero would have recieved death threats by now lol!
So you think we should all stay away from wobble then - what about tunes like Mystikz Haunted then? You are full of shit
nah you got me wrong, i said DECENT producers should stay away from wobble
and as for haunted, well, i prefer the flip side
dubstee wrote:Haunted was made 4 years ago, not sure why people are still ripping it off tbh.
pretty much sums it up
- string
- Posts: 717
- Joined: Thu Oct 16, 2008 2:07 pm
by tommatee » Mon Jun 22, 2009 12:38 pm
String wrote:NERO - Dan wrote:
hahahahahaha i cant believe you said that dude, that's the most ridiculous statement I've seen on this forum. Filters are a crucial part of subtractive synthesis, LFOs on filters equally as important and widely used since the dawn of synthesizers. You're basically writing off the majority of electronic music.
wow you exposed my lack of knowledge on production! but you'd think with all that knowledge you have you'd be able to make a decent tune
hahaha This!
GMT
-
tommatee - Posts: 168
- Joined: Tue Jul 24, 2007 11:19 am
by duck » Mon Jun 22, 2009 12:57 pm
don't really get this... how does a remix "ruin" the original tune.
if you wanna listen to the Nero remix cool, if you don't, get the original out and ignore the Nero version. problem solved.
you can sort me out the cash later, yeah?
if you wanna listen to the Nero remix cool, if you don't, get the original out and ignore the Nero version. problem solved.
you can sort me out the cash later, yeah?
- duck
- Posts: 243
- Joined: Sun Mar 05, 2006 11:35 pm
- Location: London E5
by rob sparx » Mon Jun 22, 2009 1:05 pm
String wrote:Rob Sparx wrote:String wrote:NERO - Dan wrote:String wrote:NERO - Dan wrote:String wrote:NERO - Dan wrote:String wrote:NERO - Dan wrote:THE-VOICE-OF-REASON wrote:Fucking hell they raped that tune , Nero make music that's the lowest common denominator. Funny thing is that their wobble at 170 is considered shit but their wobble at 140 is considered innovative!?!
In what way is that bass a wobble?
Pretty obvious its just generic wobble pattern
What is a wobble?
You've made dnb for long enough, i know you know what it is!
Well I'd say its usually a square wave with a 'squeltchy' resonant lfo on it playing a pattern that accentuates the feeling of wobbling around. I think what you're doing is confusing lfo with wobble. Or do you think that synthesizers should start replacing lfo with the word 'wobble'?
yeah I think it should be replaced with the word 'wobble', just so that all good producers know to keep the fuck away from it
hahahahahaha i cant believe you said that dude, that's the most ridiculous statement I've seen on this forum. Filters are a crucial part of subtractive synthesis, LFOs on filters equally as important and widely used since the dawn of synthesizers. You're basically writing off the majority of electronic music.
wow you exposed my lack of knowledge on production! but you'd think with all that knowledge you have you'd be able to make a decent tune
There's no wobble in this tune - if there was I think Nero would have recieved death threats by now lol!
So you think we should all stay away from wobble then - what about tunes like Mystikz Haunted then? You are full of shit
nah you got me wrong, i said DECENT producers should stay away from wobble
and as for haunted, well, i prefer the flip sidedubstee wrote:Haunted was made 4 years ago, not sure why people are still ripping it off tbh.
pretty much sums it up
You should appreciate wobble as you are clearly a fucking retard in suggesting producers shouldn't use LFOs - fuck right off!!
- rob sparx
- Posts: 1164
- Joined: Tue May 13, 2008 11:52 pm
- Location: Leicester
by string » Mon Jun 22, 2009 1:23 pm
Rob Sparx wrote:String wrote:Rob Sparx wrote:String wrote:NERO - Dan wrote:String wrote:NERO - Dan wrote:String wrote:NERO - Dan wrote:String wrote:NERO - Dan wrote:THE-VOICE-OF-REASON wrote:Fucking hell they raped that tune , Nero make music that's the lowest common denominator. Funny thing is that their wobble at 170 is considered shit but their wobble at 140 is considered innovative!?!
In what way is that bass a wobble?
Pretty obvious its just generic wobble pattern
What is a wobble?
You've made dnb for long enough, i know you know what it is!
Well I'd say its usually a square wave with a 'squeltchy' resonant lfo on it playing a pattern that accentuates the feeling of wobbling around. I think what you're doing is confusing lfo with wobble. Or do you think that synthesizers should start replacing lfo with the word 'wobble'?
yeah I think it should be replaced with the word 'wobble', just so that all good producers know to keep the fuck away from it
hahahahahaha i cant believe you said that dude, that's the most ridiculous statement I've seen on this forum. Filters are a crucial part of subtractive synthesis, LFOs on filters equally as important and widely used since the dawn of synthesizers. You're basically writing off the majority of electronic music.
wow you exposed my lack of knowledge on production! but you'd think with all that knowledge you have you'd be able to make a decent tune
There's no wobble in this tune - if there was I think Nero would have recieved death threats by now lol!
So you think we should all stay away from wobble then - what about tunes like Mystikz Haunted then? You are full of shit
nah you got me wrong, i said DECENT producers should stay away from wobble
and as for haunted, well, i prefer the flip sidedubstee wrote:Haunted was made 4 years ago, not sure why people are still ripping it off tbh.
pretty much sums it up
You should appreciate wobble as you are clearly a fucking retard in suggesting producers shouldn't use LFOs - fuck right off!!
why should i appreciate wobble, its fucking shit and is made by idiots, no soul, no substance
so fuck off yourself
- string
- Posts: 717
- Joined: Thu Oct 16, 2008 2:07 pm
by subonedubstep » Mon Jun 22, 2009 1:24 pm
dubstee wrote:).
Haunted was made 4 years ago, not sure why people are still ripping it off tbh.
This!
- subonedubstep
- Posts: 16
- Joined: Wed Jan 14, 2009 11:35 pm
by dubstee » Mon Jun 22, 2009 1:47 pm
Rob Sparx wrote:You should appreciate wobble as you are clearly a fucking retard in suggesting producers shouldn't use LFOs - fuck right off!!
Missing the point here I think Rob... the complaint isn't about using LFOs per se, it's the ubiquitous trend of using a mid range synth line with a simple low pass cutoff LFO on it, over the top of a sub and a half step beat. Or just a triplets synth/sub line with the same sort of beat, as in this remix. It's SUCH a cliche, and it's SO unimaginative. People are more than justified in rallying against it.
- dubstee
- Posts: 242
- Joined: Fri Dec 30, 2005 9:08 pm
by .rudetone. » Mon Jun 22, 2009 1:53 pm
stanton wrote:Even the last DMZ seemed to be full of tunes with that generic dnb kick drum build up to generic drop (duh-duh-duh-duh-duhduhduhduhduhduhduhduh----drop), each to their own and all that but isn't it all getting a bit fucking dull and predictable now?
Noticed this a lot and yes, it is getting VERY fucking dull and predictable now...to the point that I am sick of a lot of 'Dubstep'.
Don't mind that Nero remix, nothing special but not worth a slating..and I find the oldies kicking off about it quite funny.
duck wrote:don't really get this... how does a remix "ruin" the original tune.
It doesn't
Last edited by .rudetone. on Mon Jun 22, 2009 1:54 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- .rudetone.
- Posts: 1248
- Joined: Fri Aug 18, 2006 8:45 pm
- Location: York
by bandshell » Mon Jun 22, 2009 1:53 pm
lol some intense hating in this thread now, seems to getting out of hand.
I suggest everyone go off and write a haiku, maybe have a sandwich and a cup of tea. (This statement can be as patronizing as you want
)
I suggest everyone go off and write a haiku, maybe have a sandwich and a cup of tea. (This statement can be as patronizing as you want
)dhaywood wrote:seckle wrote:mine arrived today. first 2 chapters in already.
u da man bro
read dem bookz
-
bandshell - Posts: 9102
- Joined: Thu Jun 26, 2008 8:56 pm
by nakedlunch » Mon Jun 22, 2009 2:13 pm
bandshell wrote:
I suggest everyone go off and write a haiku,
Trying to Remix Sincere
Is like picking up a turd
From the clean end.
- nakedlunch
- Posts: 570
- Joined: Mon Sep 10, 2007 9:45 pm
- Location: http://lnk.ms/0KSYS
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: bela, Dub_freak, E-shed, gantzgraf, Glue Reed, hendramarshall, Lectric, Lethal Dosage, Maccaveli, McGuigan, Nooc210, plattST, Pulp, pulsar, solo strike, the_disconekt and 40 guests