OMFG - A musical revolution lies ahead
Forum rules
By using this "Production" sub-forum, you acknowledge that you have read, understood and agreed with our terms of use for this site. Click HERE to read them. If you do not agree to our terms of use, you must exit this site immediately. We do not accept any responsibility for the content, submissions, information or links contained herein. Users posting content here, do so completely at their own risk.
Quick Link to Feedback Forum
By using this "Production" sub-forum, you acknowledge that you have read, understood and agreed with our terms of use for this site. Click HERE to read them. If you do not agree to our terms of use, you must exit this site immediately. We do not accept any responsibility for the content, submissions, information or links contained herein. Users posting content here, do so completely at their own risk.
Quick Link to Feedback Forum
OMFG - A musical revolution lies ahead
Imageline changed the default Tempo to 130 BPM

Re: OMFG - A musical revolution lies ahead
tbh i never got 120 anyway. i mean even if you go by house and trance being the most popular genres of electronic music it's just too damn slow.
-
DJ Crackle
- Posts: 650
- Joined: Sat Jul 24, 2010 12:54 am
- Contact:
Re: OMFG - A musical revolution lies ahead
Fruity used to be 140!!! the secret of the Dubstep Swagger. 120 Bpm is in more tradional DAWs where they sometimes record these old fashioned rock'n'roll bands.....hasezwei wrote:tbh i never got 120 anyway. i mean even if you go by house and trance being the most popular genres of electronic music it's just too damn slow.
Re: OMFG - A musical revolution lies ahead
repost of an earlier reply I made about the 140 dogma:
Lemonlust wrote:I mean, most dubstep songs are 140 bpm. Would it not be considered dubstep if it were a different tempo?
YES.
...I don't believe that dubstep has to be a certain tempo in order to be dubstep. I would say that if it got fast enough it'd often be functionally indistinguishable from DnB, but that's because the two are musical cousins with many shared references including each one to the other (like Loefah saying he started out wanting to make slower, more danceable & vibe-heavy jungle, or the current fad for ½step in DnB.)
When people first started applying the term "dubstep" to the fairly broad continuum of bass-heavy underground sounds coming out there was a wider range of tempos in the music being described. The lowest common denominator was the Bass/Space/Pace formula, but specific ratios of each were pretty wide open back then.
As it coalesced into a more 'stable,' 'defined,' or 'generic' sound (all of these descriptives are true in some measure) then the tyranny of 140 arose from DJ complicity for the same reasons that DJs like house music: it's much easier to mix something that you know is going to follow the same tempo or pattern as the tune that's on deck without thinking ahead. You can just reach in the bag and know that it's all... the same.
I disagree with the earlier statement that when it gets too much slower it becomes downtempo - you can't say that slower stuff by Scorn or Barry Hercules' sounds like downtempo, because it's heavier and not just slower. Downtempo tends to have a different vibe that's more about chillin' and relaxing, while aggressively heavy music does NOT have that effect usually. You could say there's a certain tension that belongs to dubstep that's not a desired goal in much downtempo music...
FIGHT
B.P.M.
FASCISM!
![]()
Re: OMFG - A musical revolution lies ahead
So finally Imageline set us free

Re: OMFG - A musical revolution lies ahead
oh i thought they were moving it towards dubstep. so they're moving it AWAY from dubstep? wow, FL really *is* better than i thoughtbuttock wrote:Fruity used to be 140!!! the secret of the Dubstep Swagger. 120 Bpm is in more tradional DAWs where they sometimes record these old fashioned rock'n'roll bands.....hasezwei wrote:tbh i never got 120 anyway. i mean even if you go by house and trance being the most popular genres of electronic music it's just too damn slow.
@alphacat: i thought dubstep was always pretty much 130+ bpm, descending from garage and all. it's just that halftime doesn't work when you go considerably slower than 138, and halftime's become one of the main elements of the sound (sadly).
but who cares about standard tempos in DAWs anyway ?
-
sketchyderek
- Posts: 187
- Joined: Thu Sep 16, 2010 8:07 pm
Re: OMFG - A musical revolution lies ahead
Mmmmmm shuffles sound better in the 142 - 144 range, imho.
120-130 is soo sloowwww
need i bring up "moombahcore" lolz
120-130 is soo sloowwww
need i bring up "moombahcore" lolz
-
DJ Crackle
- Posts: 650
- Joined: Sat Jul 24, 2010 12:54 am
- Contact:
Re: OMFG - A musical revolution lies ahead
inoritehasezwei wrote:but who cares about standard tempos in DAWs anyway ?
can you not change default bpm in FL?
Re: OMFG - A musical revolution lies ahead
Hopefully they'll let you be able to change the starting tempo speed, if it's not too hard for them of course ¬¬
True that.Pedro Sánchez wrote:Kick Hat Snare Hat @ 140 innit, no need for anything else.
Re: OMFG - A musical revolution lies ahead
feature request 
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests
