Requake.

Earjax · Post by **Earjax** » Sun Jan 29, 2012 11:24 pm

Enough said? If not:
Soundcloud
Soundcloud
Kings of both sides of dubstep atm in my opinion, how the fuck do they get their sounds so dripping wet? I can get a fairly good mid-range requake-y bass in massive quite easily, but their subs!!!! How do I get my subs to sound so dynamic and powerful?? Particularly good in the track "so"

dubesteppe · Post by **dubesteppe** » Mon Jan 30, 2012 12:52 am

on "so" it sounded like they might have put a subharmonic synth on their sub

Earjax · Post by **Earjax** » Mon Jan 30, 2012 8:01 am

yeah theres definitely some layering going on, I can't get these kind of harmonics in mono though? Can I break the mono rule above like 80hz for example?

RandoRando · Post by **RandoRando** » Mon Jan 30, 2012 10:58 am

in their remix of "coochie" it sounds like maelstrom in it, i could be wrong though, i have no idea if they use reason

Cubicle · Post by **Cubicle** » Mon Jan 30, 2012 11:05 am

RandoRando wrote:in their remix of "coochie" it sounds like maelstrom in it, i could be wrong though, i have no idea if they use reason

Ye they do use Reason. Same with Badklaat. Afaik.

dubesteppe · Post by **dubesteppe** » Mon Jan 30, 2012 5:36 pm

Earjax wrote:yeah theres definitely some layering going on, I can't get these kind of harmonics in mono though? Can I break the mono rule above like 80hz for example?

sub harmonic synthesis shouldnt effect your stereo image. it just creates harmonic undertones

Earjax · Post by **Earjax** » Mon Jan 30, 2012 7:13 pm

dubesteppe wrote:
Earjax wrote:yeah theres definitely some layering going on, I can't get these kind of harmonics in mono though? Can I break the mono rule above like 80hz for example?
sub harmonic synthesis shouldnt effect your stereo image. it just creates harmonic undertones

what exactly do you mean by sub harmonic then? I just thought it meant putting stuff like combs and chorus on your sub

naroja · Post by **naroja** » Mon Jan 30, 2012 7:55 pm

Earjax wrote: Kings of both sides of dubstep atm in my opinion, how the fuck do they get their sounds so dripping wet?

Good EQing....

(play with mid / side a lot)

Earjax · Post by **Earjax** » Mon Jan 30, 2012 9:07 pm

Hmmm well I think I can EQ pretty well atm, like I know which frequencies to duck on my mids and I know what frequencies are gonna hit hardest on my sub, I think its more about their effects chain and the way its made tbh

dubesteppe · Post by **dubesteppe** » Tue Jan 31, 2012 4:53 am

Earjax wrote:
dubesteppe wrote:
Earjax wrote:yeah theres definitely some layering going on, I can't get these kind of harmonics in mono though? Can I break the mono rule above like 80hz for example?
sub harmonic synthesis shouldnt effect your stereo image. it just creates harmonic undertones
what exactly do you mean by sub harmonic then? I just thought it meant putting stuff like combs and chorus on your sub

check out http://www.refusesoftware.com/lowender.html

sketchyderek · Post by **sketchyderek** » Tue Jan 31, 2012 5:38 am

So I've been looking into the Aphex Aurel Exciter w/ Big Bottom...
Kind of wrote off the "big bottom" but would this work good on the sub? >.>

Requake.

Requake.

Re: Requake.

Re: Requake.

Re: Requake.

Re: Requake.

Re: Requake.

Re: Requake.

Re: Requake.

Re: Requake.

Re: Requake.

Re: Requake.

Who is online