Moderators: dubway, fractal, badger, wub, seckle, pete bubonic
Sinestepper wrote:Well. Its a sub. So just a sine wave? is there something i have missed?
Sinestepper wrote:Well. Its a sub. So just a sine wave? is there something i have missed?
Sinestepper wrote:All im saying is. I make a sine sub then layer it under another synth even if that is a lowpassed square. I feel like I have more control over the sound this way. I mean seriously I would never overdrive my sine either, thats just nuts.
coogcoo wrote: we used to crank the sampling input on an s2000 until it practically sounded like gabber kicks, and then low-pass lightly.
Genevieve wrote:coogcoo wrote: we used to crank the sampling input on an s2000 until it practically sounded like gabber kicks, and then low-pass lightly.
Might as well just use a squarewave then though. I think you were just kinda fooled by the loudness of the signal after it was distorted compared the clean signal.
Earjax wrote:Sinestepper wrote:All im saying is. I make a sine sub then layer it under another synth even if that is a lowpassed square. I feel like I have more control over the sound this way. I mean seriously I would never overdrive my sine either, thats just nuts.
Well I guess thats just you manWelcome to the world of brostep by the way

Sinestepper wrote:Earjax wrote:Sinestepper wrote:All im saying is. I make a sine sub then layer it under another synth even if that is a lowpassed square. I feel like I have more control over the sound this way. I mean seriously I would never overdrive my sine either, thats just nuts.
Well I guess thats just you manWelcome to the world of brostep by the way
Brostep!? What...??
Sinestepper wrote:Im confused as to why you welcomed me to the "world of Brostep" out of the blue. :/ Also I disagree with what you just said.


Return to Production, Hardware & Technical
Users browsing this forum: Artie Fufkin, dubunked, PillowFight, wolf89 and 22 guests