i actually always say that.. even when sean paul became a phenomenon i was like... nothing against the dude.. his fanbase tho...

same with skrillex... altho i admit he sounds a little snarky and id prolly steal his gf for 30 min in a club or sumthin.. just for the sake of it...

i either do it all wrong or it's just one of those things i get, mixing is (mostly) easy for me anybody else ever felt like this? tough luv but from a technical standpoint ur tracks have severe dynamics issues... altho aesthetically that might be just what you're after tough luv.. no harsh feelings...

lol rashad is figgin raw

i love it reminds me of old school hip hop

but i admit i never know how its gonna turn out in a club

Groundhog day nah seriously... i was there once, ud get amazed by how much ur computer can excell at things if u LEARN your tools inside and out... the level of complexity of the sounds you're after lies in resampling mostly... and is it a cool thing if i tell u both noisia and skrillex use itb setu...

bc it mostly works with wave tables

depends on what ur currently lacking the most

My bad mixing skills has really begun to piss me off lately.. I even cry myself to sleep trying to figure out this riddle. I was wondering if anyone could give some good tips on how I can practice my mixing, as I don't want to make a WHOLE tune and then start mixing. Don't anyone have some fancy ti...

wanted to point that out but it felt unnecessary meheheh

Try limiting things earlier on in the mix - a little bit at each stage adds more overall loudness by the time the audio hits master out - I'm talking like half to a db on the buss, then half to a db on the submix then the same again on the master out. wow its a shame how little i tend to use limite...

fm8 is the only synth id keep if i had to keep one

and no its not complicated.

huge thread on gearslutz about that i remember...
some say certain pan laws are more "musical"... like the +3 one... if i remember

i mean, u always end up balancing ur volums now dontcha? to me any of these settings won't ruin a mix if crafted by an experimented cat

u just need to read something about substractive synthesis at first.. since most people say its the easiest... download a freeware synth.. or a dirty one if ur one of the kids that think that since theyve cracked massive they can do it like the big guys ... but i wouldnt do that if i were u... try a...

just learn about synthesis...

it means sounds u build from simple oscillations

changes ur perception of sound forever

ive always felt developing an actual textural vocabulary could grant me elasticity in composition regarding tempos, melodies, instrumentation, arrangements... but it seems that grooves also play a huge part in this... mosca is a good example of what id call a versatile artist ... i guess its a matte...

sorry i was talking single hits

and the non characteristic ones...

r u referring to the we will rock u clap?

^savvy answer, love it

started mixing 2 years ago.. thats it

started scratching almost 10 years ago

it would be extremely hard to prove i didnt record a sound that is similar to the original.. u people are shoving clouds...

in the here and now i hugely doubt anyone will notice i took one sound out of a tune (which i never do anyways)... people are big on drum machine samples anyways haha

Insahn wrote:Andy Wallace actually uses a lot more quick fader riding than compression if you are looking to duck like he does. People say they are very surprised by how little compression he uses.

quite interesting, ive heard stuff about riding the faders as a first method of dynamic control before!

dont feel offended it was a statement at large...