Page 4 of 4
Posted: Sat Nov 24, 2007 5:02 am
basically people I haven't heard enough from!!
indeed and also sugh knight
Posted: Sat Nov 24, 2007 4:16 pm
titchyschneider wrote:if they do a grime 3 they need to call it DUBSTEP, not grime. cos that last one wasnt grime at all.
agreed, but it's just a shame to see rephlex not apart of things any longer.
Posted: Sat Nov 24, 2007 4:35 pm
LOL...what's up w/ all the necro-bumps lately?
Posted: Sat Nov 24, 2007 5:34 pm
'Industrial graft' by Plasticman off grime 1 is still one of the heaviest beats I've ever heard.
Posted: Sat Nov 24, 2007 6:48 pm
I don't think Rephlex is interested in dubstep at all nowadays, and to be honest i don't think it'd be a right decision for them, with the amount of new labels releasing dubstep at the moment I think they're better focusing on their usual roster. By the way, the new Bogdan Raczinsky album
Posted: Sat Nov 24, 2007 7:36 pm
I'd have to agree with david. Rephlex goes for off-the-wall, underdog musical projects.. I think grime/dubstep has surpassed that, ie. it's well established by now.
Posted: Sat Nov 24, 2007 9:11 pm
check out da myspace n tell me wot u fink abwt it
updates are cummin very soon doe
Posted: Sun Nov 25, 2007 6:34 am
staypuft wrote:I'd have to agree with david. Rephlex goes for off-the-wall, underdog musical projects..
This is also true, but just when you think Rephlex is predictable, they do something totally unpredictable. One of my favorite labels.
Posted: Sun Nov 25, 2007 7:15 am
o ya, mine too.. I think at one point or another I've had 90+ percent of their catalogue.. was a bit obsessive there for a while.
Grime 1 is unequalled imo.. at the time it was unique, and no one has really explored that direction since. the album was more like a transmission from another dimension. I think Rephlex could again pull something amazing off (they do quite often), except it wouldn't so much be dubstep as it's mutant cousin. and probably very poorly publicized