When does "minimal" become too simple?
When does "minimal" become too simple?
With the rising popularity of minimalistic, atmospheric tracks, I'd like to ask for your opinions on where you draw the line between simplicity as an artistic choice and a track just being lazy and over simplistic. Some of my favorite songs use silence as a way to build tension and atmosphere. One of the best examples I can think of for this is "Let Me Out" by Mr Fiji Wiji. His sound design is incredible and the song has amazing atmosphere. But some tracks are just plain sloppy and lacking effort. What are your thoughts?
-
- Posts: 1172
- Joined: Sat Nov 19, 2011 5:24 am
Re: When does "minimal" become too simple?
When there's no vibe.
nowaysj wrote: ...But the chick's panties that you drop with a keytar, marry that B.
Re: When does "minimal" become too simple?
When an artist removes the elements that make a track interesting and just leaves the generic bits.
Re: When does "minimal" become too simple?
rising popularity of such tracks? what do u base this on?
imo u can have as much or as little to a track as u want, there just has to be groove. u can have groove with a kick and a 909 OH
imo u can have as much or as little to a track as u want, there just has to be groove. u can have groove with a kick and a 909 OH

-
- Posts: 4508
- Joined: Mon Mar 25, 2013 8:07 pm
- Location: Eternity
Re: When does "minimal" become too simple?
THERES NO ABSOLUTES TO THIS KIND FO THING IMO. BACK IN THE DAY MANS LIKE SATIE AND DEBUSSY ONLY USED PIANOS.
magma wrote:It's a good job none of this matters.
-
- Posts: 4508
- Joined: Mon Mar 25, 2013 8:07 pm
- Location: Eternity
Re: When does "minimal" become too simple?
IS THAT A SERIOUS QUESTION?
magma wrote:It's a good job none of this matters.
Re: When does "minimal" become too simple?
satie's brostep imo
Soundcloud
kay wrote:We kept pointing at his back and (quietly) telling people "That's M8son...."
wolf89 wrote:I really don't think I'm a music snob.
-
- Posts: 4508
- Joined: Mon Mar 25, 2013 8:07 pm
- Location: Eternity
Re: When does "minimal" become too simple?
DON'T SEE WHY BROSTEP CAN'T BE MINIMAL TBH.
magma wrote:It's a good job none of this matters.
Re: When does "minimal" become too simple?
"It's deep, it's Bro, it's minimal, this is the sound"

Anal A$ap....Keep living dat #PLUR life....To attempt to have intercourse with a hornet's nest is a very bad idea.... Swagm8son wrote:yh a bit of extra knob fiddling is ok
Instagram Soundcloud
-
- Posts: 4508
- Joined: Mon Mar 25, 2013 8:07 pm
- Location: Eternity
Re: When does "minimal" become too simple?
DIDN'T REALISE WE WERE BEING SNOBS TBH. THOUGHT WE WERE ACTUALLY TALKING MUSIC TBH.
magma wrote:It's a good job none of this matters.
Re: When does "minimal" become too simple?
Welcome To DSF
AxeD wrote:Kind of harsh guys. He got sentenced and he admits it was a huge mistake.
It's not like he dislikes Vivek or something.
TopManLurka wrote:inshallah your ears find their path in life m7.
m8son666 wrote:when i say son what i mean is catOGLemon wrote:when did you become a father?
-
- Posts: 4508
- Joined: Mon Mar 25, 2013 8:07 pm
- Location: Eternity
Re: When does "minimal" become too simple?
Shut up.
magma wrote:It's a good job none of this matters.
Re: When does "minimal" become too simple?

SoundcloudAxeD wrote:I dunno, there's some thoroughly unemployed people on this forum.
Re: When does "minimal" become too simple?
I'd say (for what it's worth) that the two aren't synonymous (i.e simple doesn't = minimal, and vice versa), and that 'simple' doesn't have to be construed negatively. Pinch's stuff is quite minimal however it is far from simple, in that the very few elements are arranged in often complex ways e.g evolving percussive arrangements, discrete blending of pads, counterpoint bass, extended kick drum patterns. Loefah's early stuff keep the pulse of the track whilst using very few elements. I'd say if the track loses momentum or cohesiveness, or there isn't a direction/development within the track there may be something missing. Naturally, the opposite of this is also true: too many conflicting elements will detract attention from one another, leaving the tack feeling cluttered or stumbling. Pinch definitely hits the nail:
“Minimal excellence is one of the hardest things to achieve in music-making as it requires all the sonic ingredients to be nothing less than perfect....."
Perfect then is just enough to create the right pulse/emotion/space/whatever, and used with precision and restraint. (?)
“Minimal excellence is one of the hardest things to achieve in music-making as it requires all the sonic ingredients to be nothing less than perfect....."
Perfect then is just enough to create the right pulse/emotion/space/whatever, and used with precision and restraint. (?)
Re: When does "minimal" become too simple?
this_ronzlo_ wrote:When there's no vibe.
Re: When does "minimal" become too simple?
when the atmospherics aren't worked on well enough, the track just literally becomes beats and bass.
loefah - woman, for instance, is beats and bass. but the sampling gives the track its vibe and meaning. probably didn't put my point across in the best words but i'm sure some of you know what i'm on about
loefah - woman, for instance, is beats and bass. but the sampling gives the track its vibe and meaning. probably didn't put my point across in the best words but i'm sure some of you know what i'm on about
-
- Posts: 4508
- Joined: Mon Mar 25, 2013 8:07 pm
- Location: Eternity
Re: When does "minimal" become too simple?
That being there doesn't really make a track better though. Tons of tunes with that kind of stuff that sound thin and pathetic imo.
And there's good stuff out there that's just beats and bass imo.
And there's good stuff out there that's just beats and bass imo.
magma wrote:It's a good job none of this matters.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests