Who's frequency chart is it anyways?
Forum rules
By using this "Production" sub-forum, you acknowledge that you have read, understood and agreed with our terms of use for this site. Click HERE to read them. If you do not agree to our terms of use, you must exit this site immediately. We do not accept any responsibility for the content, submissions, information or links contained herein. Users posting content here, do so completely at their own risk.
Quick Link to Feedback Forum
By using this "Production" sub-forum, you acknowledge that you have read, understood and agreed with our terms of use for this site. Click HERE to read them. If you do not agree to our terms of use, you must exit this site immediately. We do not accept any responsibility for the content, submissions, information or links contained herein. Users posting content here, do so completely at their own risk.
Quick Link to Feedback Forum
-
- Posts: 31
- Joined: Tue Nov 05, 2013 9:16 am
Who's frequency chart is it anyways?
I've found a couple of these on the internet and some are different from eachother... Why is that? Do you have other charts? What chart would you say is the most accurate? Im looking for one that shows the low mids and highs like the ones I provided..
Re: Who's frequency chart is it anyways?
Personally, I've always considered these as 50% true, 50% bullshit.
Re: Who's frequency chart is it anyways?
You can't argue with most of these. Maybe some of the terms are a bit odd.
Agent 47 wrote:Next time I can think of something, I will.
Re: Who's frequency chart is it anyways?
What difference does it make that one person says the low-mids start at 250 and one person says they start at 200. I don't see any usefulness in making that concrete. Charts like these kinda feel like using a buzzfeed article in a research essay...
SunkLo wrote: If ragging on the 'shortcut to the top' mentality makes me a hater then shower me in haterade.
Re: Who's frequency chart is it anyways?
Think they're a good way for knewbs to start looking when they set out to eq. Not much more. But nudges in the right direction like this can shave time off the learning curve.
Re: Who's frequency chart is it anyways?
Certainly. I guess I was just trying to figure out--in my typical grumpy fashion--what the OP was really looking for out of this discussion.nowaysj wrote:Think they're a good way for knewbs to start looking when they set out to eq. Not much more. But nudges in the right direction like this can shave time off the learning curve.
SunkLo wrote: If ragging on the 'shortcut to the top' mentality makes me a hater then shower me in haterade.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests