gain structure and mixing aka THE MONEYSHOT THREAD

hardware, software, tips and tricks
Forum rules
By using this "Production" sub-forum, you acknowledge that you have read, understood and agreed with our terms of use for this site. Click HERE to read them. If you do not agree to our terms of use, you must exit this site immediately. We do not accept any responsibility for the content, submissions, information or links contained herein. Users posting content here, do so completely at their own risk.

Quick Link to Feedback Forum
Locked
User avatar
daft cunt
Posts: 1702
Joined: Thu Feb 01, 2007 8:58 pm
Location: Toulouse, France

gain structure and mixing aka THE MONEYSHOT THREAD

Post by daft cunt » Fri Jan 30, 2009 9:46 am

Let's say the drums hit up to -3 dB, what should be a fair volume for the sub?

macc
Posts: 1737
Joined: Wed Aug 27, 2008 11:56 pm
Location: http://www.scmastering.com , maac at subvertmastering dot com
Contact:

Post by macc » Fri Jan 30, 2009 10:14 am

Sorry if it isn't really answering your question, but -3 is way too high.

Remember that 6dB is half. So if you have one element at -6, that is half your headroom gone. Two elements at -6dB each = all your headroom gone. Having the drums at -3 will leave you fighting against clipping and struggling to keep everything down and under control.

Rather, set your drums for *around* -8 / -10 (ie, a bit less than half). The bass - if we are talking a pure sine sub - would probably sit best a dB or two below that, any distorted/fullband bass sounds should be effectively treated as different entities and mixed appropriately (due to Fletcher Munson).

This leaves you with a few dB headroom, and everything else is just parsley. No more fighting anything, you *will* get repeatable and consistent levels in your mixes, and better mixes as a result.

:) :) :)
www.scmastering.com / email: macc at subvertmastering dot com

User avatar
daft cunt
Posts: 1702
Joined: Thu Feb 01, 2007 8:58 pm
Location: Toulouse, France

Post by daft cunt » Fri Jan 30, 2009 11:14 am

Thanks a lot! That's definately going to help!

While you're here, can I have your view on that one:
http://www.dubstepforum.com/viewtopic.php?t=74831

macc
Posts: 1737
Joined: Wed Aug 27, 2008 11:56 pm
Location: http://www.scmastering.com , maac at subvertmastering dot com
Contact:

Post by macc » Fri Jan 30, 2009 11:29 am

I read that but it looked like you'd sorted it out :)

Besides, I was only going to say 'fuck all that shit - how does it sound?' :D I thought that might come across snobby/rude/condescending so I didn't post :oops: .


I feel a bit of a rant/preach/lecture coming on :oops:

The above post I made is proooooooperly important. Good fundamental gain structure from the word go is the easiest way to get a good mix. You should, IMHO, always be looking to get any/all sounds as right as possible, as early as possible in the signal chain IMHO. Think of a top notch jazz band - they play at the right level, it gets recorded, no mixing/eq/compression, no editing, no fuckin nothing. And it sounds the absolute bollocks.

While that doesn't totally apply to dubstep etc, the principle is the same. If your 'band' plays the right thing at the right level with a good sound, your tune will mix itself. All these sidechains and multiband doodads and insane eq curves blah blah - unless used specifically as creative effects - are just sticking plasters for the fact the 'band' fucked up.

[/preach]

IMHO of course :oops:
www.scmastering.com / email: macc at subvertmastering dot com

User avatar
3rdeye
Posts: 1720
Joined: Thu Sep 14, 2006 12:22 am
Location: Byron Bay 2481

Post by 3rdeye » Fri Jan 30, 2009 12:19 pm

Macc wrote:I read that but it looked like you'd sorted it out :)

Besides, I was only going to say 'fuck all that shit - how does it sound?' :D I thought that might come across snobby/rude/condescending so I didn't post :oops: .


I feel a bit of a rant/preach/lecture coming on :oops:

The above post I made is proooooooperly important. Good fundamental gain structure from the word go is the easiest way to get a good mix. You should, IMHO, always be looking to get any/all sounds as right as possible, as early as possible in the signal chain IMHO. Think of a top notch jazz band - they play at the right level, it gets recorded, no mixing/eq/compression, no editing, no fuckin nothing. And it sounds the absolute bollocks.

While that doesn't totally apply to dubstep etc, the principle is the same. If your 'band' plays the right thing at the right level with a good sound, your tune will mix itself. All these sidechains and multiband doodads and insane eq curves blah blah - unless used specifically as creative effects - are just sticking plasters for the fact the 'band' fucked up.

[/preach]

IMHO of course :oops:
100% absolutely spot on! :)
Subtitles | Area Recordings | Muti Music | Requiem Audio | Subway | Gradient Audio
http://www.soundcloud.com/3rdeye

jalfrezi
Posts: 226
Joined: Wed Apr 19, 2006 5:32 pm
Contact:

Post by jalfrezi » Fri Jan 30, 2009 1:37 pm

Macc wrote:I read that but it looked like you'd sorted it out :)

Besides, I was only going to say 'fuck all that shit - how does it sound?' :D I thought that might come across snobby/rude/condescending so I didn't post :oops: .


I feel a bit of a rant/preach/lecture coming on :oops:

The above post I made is proooooooperly important. Good fundamental gain structure from the word go is the easiest way to get a good mix. You should, IMHO, always be looking to get any/all sounds as right as possible, as early as possible in the signal chain IMHO. Think of a top notch jazz band - they play at the right level, it gets recorded, no mixing/eq/compression, no editing, no fuckin nothing. And it sounds the absolute bollocks.

While that doesn't totally apply to dubstep etc, the principle is the same. If your 'band' plays the right thing at the right level with a good sound, your tune will mix itself. All these sidechains and multiband doodads and insane eq curves blah blah - unless used specifically as creative effects - are just sticking plasters for the fact the 'band' fucked up.

[/preach]

IMHO of course :oops:


once again

:h:

User avatar
daft cunt
Posts: 1702
Joined: Thu Feb 01, 2007 8:58 pm
Location: Toulouse, France

Post by daft cunt » Fri Jan 30, 2009 1:59 pm

Jalfrezi wrote:
Macc wrote:I read that but it looked like you'd sorted it out :)

Besides, I was only going to say 'fuck all that shit - how does it sound?' :D I thought that might come across snobby/rude/condescending so I didn't post :oops: .


I feel a bit of a rant/preach/lecture coming on :oops:

The above post I made is proooooooperly important. Good fundamental gain structure from the word go is the easiest way to get a good mix. You should, IMHO, always be looking to get any/all sounds as right as possible, as early as possible in the signal chain IMHO. Think of a top notch jazz band - they play at the right level, it gets recorded, no mixing/eq/compression, no editing, no fuckin nothing. And it sounds the absolute bollocks.

While that doesn't totally apply to dubstep etc, the principle is the same. If your 'band' plays the right thing at the right level with a good sound, your tune will mix itself. All these sidechains and multiband doodads and insane eq curves blah blah - unless used specifically as creative effects - are just sticking plasters for the fact the 'band' fucked up.

[/preach]

IMHO of course :oops:


once again

:h:
+ 1 :D

ketamine
Posts: 4367
Joined: Wed Dec 17, 2008 8:52 pm

Post by ketamine » Fri Jan 30, 2009 2:24 pm

Macc wrote:Sorry if it isn't really answering your question, but -3 is way too high.

Remember that 6dB is half. So if you have one element at -6, that is half your headroom gone. Two elements at -6dB each = all your headroom gone. Having the drums at -3 will leave you fighting against clipping and struggling to keep everything down and under control.

Rather, set your drums for *around* -8 / -10 (ie, a bit less than half). The bass - if we are talking a pure sine sub - would probably sit best a dB or two below that, any distorted/fullband bass sounds should be effectively treated as different entities and mixed appropriately (due to Fletcher Munson).

This leaves you with a few dB headroom, and everything else is just parsley. No more fighting anything, you *will* get repeatable and consistent levels in your mixes, and better mixes as a result.

:) :) :)
:?: I suppose you mean on the Master channel.
If drums are -3 to 0 on their own channels what different does it make.

macc
Posts: 1737
Joined: Wed Aug 27, 2008 11:56 pm
Location: http://www.scmastering.com , maac at subvertmastering dot com
Contact:

Post by macc » Fri Jan 30, 2009 2:31 pm

district wrote: this is interesting, might test it out on the tune i'm working on later as a rough guide.. cheers
It's just good, sensible mix practice :)

- You'll never have to move your master fader again :)

- You'll never get clipping again (unless you're really doing something wrong)

- You'll mix more consistently as you won't be 'chasing your tail', pushing things up on the left and turning them down on the right (sound familiar anyone?)

- You'll get a sense for where tracks should sit peak-level-wise depending on what they are (drums ~ -8 to -10, bass a bit lower, pads maybe -18dB, shakers down below that etc).

- following from that you'll start getting the sound right at source, and find yourself moving the faders less = better fader resolution for finer level tweaking

- Your tunes are more likely to be easily master-able (no clipping or shoehorning under 0dB happening)

- Your ME will thank you for it by making it sound fucking huge

:)
www.scmastering.com / email: macc at subvertmastering dot com

macc
Posts: 1737
Joined: Wed Aug 27, 2008 11:56 pm
Location: http://www.scmastering.com , maac at subvertmastering dot com
Contact:

Post by macc » Fri Jan 30, 2009 2:36 pm

Ketamine wrote: :?: I suppose you mean on the Master channel.
If drums are -3 to 0 on their own channels what different does it make.
I'm talking peak output. Nothing to do with faders here (if I am reading you right). If a solo'ed channel peaks at -3 then the master will peak at -3. That's eating more of the cake than it should :)
www.scmastering.com / email: macc at subvertmastering dot com

serox
Posts: 4899
Joined: Fri Jan 18, 2008 9:17 am
Location: South London

Post by serox » Fri Jan 30, 2009 2:45 pm

Macc wrote:Sorry if it isn't really answering your question, but -3 is way too high.

Remember that 6dB is half. So if you have one element at -6, that is half your headroom gone. Two elements at -6dB each = all your headroom gone. Having the drums at -3 will leave you fighting against clipping and struggling to keep everything down and under control.

Rather, set your drums for *around* -8 / -10 (ie, a bit less than half). The bass - if we are talking a pure sine sub - would probably sit best a dB or two below that, any distorted/fullband bass sounds should be effectively treated as different entities and mixed appropriately (due to Fletcher Munson).

This leaves you with a few dB headroom, and everything else is just parsley. No more fighting anything, you *will* get repeatable and consistent levels in your mixes, and better mixes as a result.

:) :) :)
But you are talking about how you want a tune when it is handed to you for mastering, right? If say someone is only boosting things to sound good to play on a rig from a CD then they have to do this, don’t they? If they don’t compress + limit loads then things will sound weak.
Don’t worry about people stealing an idea. If it’s original, you will have to ram it down their throats.

macc
Posts: 1737
Joined: Wed Aug 27, 2008 11:56 pm
Location: http://www.scmastering.com , maac at subvertmastering dot com
Contact:

Post by macc » Fri Jan 30, 2009 2:54 pm

Nothing to do with mastering. You're completely missing the point :)

This is mixing :) It is the simple fundamentals of gain structuring for building a good mix. Whatever comes later, comes later - level boosting and what not. But I 100% guarantee (and I don't do that very often) that your mixes will improve with consistent, sensible gain structuring.

As a side effect, mastering (or level boosting for DJ play etc) becomes easier, and will yield better results because the mix is better built. It's as simple as that.

FWIW 'If they don’t compress + limit loads then things will sound weak.' is so terribly wrong. Quiet yes, weak no. Do some level-matched comparisons of heavily limited tracks vs their clean counterparts and tell me which is weaker ;)

POWER comes from a good mix. Get the mix right and the level will take care of itself.
www.scmastering.com / email: macc at subvertmastering dot com

serox
Posts: 4899
Joined: Fri Jan 18, 2008 9:17 am
Location: South London

Post by serox » Fri Jan 30, 2009 3:03 pm

cool thanks. I cannot be alone with this but I often have my bass sitting around the same as my kick or it just doesn't bang. I often try get my tune to peak at the same level as another Dubstep tune and I will need to put the bass volumn up or it just doesn't come near where I want it too :oops:
Don’t worry about people stealing an idea. If it’s original, you will have to ram it down their throats.

martello
Posts: 655
Joined: Sun Sep 09, 2007 2:46 pm
Location: Estonia

Post by martello » Fri Jan 30, 2009 3:07 pm

[listening like 6 years old kiddy how grandfather is talking]

:o

macc
Posts: 1737
Joined: Wed Aug 27, 2008 11:56 pm
Location: http://www.scmastering.com , maac at subvertmastering dot com
Contact:

Post by macc » Fri Jan 30, 2009 3:59 pm

Serox wrote:cool thanks. I cannot be alone with this but I often have my bass sitting around the same as my kick or it just doesn't bang. I often try get my tune to peak at the same level as another Dubstep tune and I will need to put the bass volumn up or it just doesn't come near where I want it too :oops:
Remember that you're (probably?) comparing to a mastered tune. I'm going to put this in big letters :)

DO YOUR A-B COMPARISONS AT MATCHED SUBJECTIVE LEVELS

Turn that tune down so it sounds the same level as yours, not the other way round. THen you can properly assess the quality of your mix without being fooled by the level. Once you make your mixes sound as good as those, mastering will become almost trivial.

Ah, it sounds so easy when I write it like that :lol:
www.scmastering.com / email: macc at subvertmastering dot com

serox
Posts: 4899
Joined: Fri Jan 18, 2008 9:17 am
Location: South London

Post by serox » Fri Jan 30, 2009 4:29 pm

Macc wrote:
Turn that tune down so it sounds the same level as yours, not the other way round. THen you can properly assess the quality of your mix without being fooled by the level. Once you make your mixes sound as good as those, mastering will become almost trivial.

Ah, it sounds so easy when I write it like that :lol:
sorry to argue but :lol:
if I leave it like that when I give it to people to listen to it sounds really quiet:/

Dont know why but it seemed to make sense if I made my master volumn the same as other tunes and try and mix everything so it sounds the same. I am not putting things in the red but they are quite close:)
Don’t worry about people stealing an idea. If it’s original, you will have to ram it down their throats.

james fox
Posts: 1254
Joined: Fri May 02, 2008 8:02 am
Location: sarf

Post by james fox » Fri Jan 30, 2009 4:31 pm

mix it down to -4db, then put a decent limiter on it before you play it to people to get the level up.

serox
Posts: 4899
Joined: Fri Jan 18, 2008 9:17 am
Location: South London

Post by serox » Fri Jan 30, 2009 4:39 pm

james fox wrote:mix it down to -4db, then put a decent limiter on it before you play it to people to get the level up.
I am not sure where I am limiting it too cos I am doing it in reason (no numbers). All I know is that its out of the red and I hear no distortion.

If I was going to be giving the tune to a ME then I wouldn't limit at all.
Don’t worry about people stealing an idea. If it’s original, you will have to ram it down their throats.

User avatar
djake
Posts: 4314
Joined: Tue Jan 16, 2007 2:03 am
Location: I found my way out of the mine

Post by djake » Fri Jan 30, 2009 4:59 pm

this thread is gold :D

Locked

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 8 guests