I don't disagree that names/genres/pigeon holes are useful, otherwise we'd all be discussing 140bpm post-UKG music with predominantly swung rhythms and shedloads of bass.Blackdown wrote:i think it's useful because there are lots of people post-Rephlex comps mixing electronica/breakcore/experimental ideas with grime and dubstep production ideas, that have few direct ties to either of the existing dubstep or grime communities. Grimm is useful to describe these new movements.
I think this is more relevant though:
Blackdown wrote:didn't Reynolds coin it? my advice is to stay away from coining genre names, artists only end up resenting you (i witnessed Ministry mag try to invent 'disco-hop' once on the basis of one Deadly Avenger 12". doh!).
That's what I'm trying to say, there's only been 4 or 5 Grim dubs, and AFAIK there wasn't anyone trying to 'name' this kind of music until the Werk releases came along. I think this Grim title is almost irrelevant and mostly counter-productive.
Not having a go at anyone in particular here, just think it's a little odd to have an apparently new genre named after a few short-run releases on one label. If I'm wrong and there's acres of Grim which I have yet to discover, I stand corrected.