Dubstep's dead baby, Dubstep's dead

Off Topic (Everything besides dubstep)
Forum rules
Please read and follow this sub-forum's specific rules listed HERE, as well as our sitewide rules listed HERE.

Link to the Secret Ninja Sessions community ustream channel - info in this thread
mizz
Posts: 283
Joined: Mon Jul 10, 2006 8:37 am
Location: Poland/Poznan
Contact:

Re: Dubstep's dead baby, Dubstep's dead

Post by mizz » Mon Sep 25, 2006 9:24 am

Mico Viejo wrote:I'm playing devil's advocate a bit, but heres something to think about:

We're starting to see Dubstep's influence spreading to other areas of music now, with people outside the scene mixing the sound with other genres, what might be considered the second stage of a scene, for example check:

www.myspace.com/spuek

www.various.co.uk

This aint neccesarily a bad thing (I'm personally feeling some of this), but stage 3 can't be far off: a David Bowie dubstep LP or some shit.

Secondly, I'm starting to wonder if Dubstep didn't die already the moment the name was coined. There's a lot of talk about how exciting the scene is cos it hasnt been locked down to any one thing yet, hasnt become formulaic. And yeah, maybe that was the case in the beginning. I bought some of the early Horsepower, Darqwan, Zed Bias stuff when it came out and din't really know what music it was, and I get the impression that they dint either. They just did it. And that stuff was exciting.

I'm rambling here, but what I wanted to say was that if u just check the first dubstep allstars LP it was diverse, exciting, more of a dark 2-step sound, but check allstars no.4 and 90% of it is pretty weak and samey. Kind of a wak white-man's reggae; hardly fukcing groundbreaking.

Its like once the name dubstep stuck everyone went "oh yeah, gots to stick some stupid skanking sounds and echoing vocals in now or it isnt dubstep".

Apart from that, I'm a little dubious as to whether its a real scene like grime is. Seems a little artificial to me, like its all just a fuss created on the internet. But maybe thats how all new forms are gonna develop now?

So, anyway, dubstep's dead, yeah: debate....
Wow :roll:
You can't take a piece (Dubstep AllStars from 3 to infinitive ;) ) and writing about dubsteps' dead. This scene is too large for that. Tempa is dying, maybe, dubstep, not!!

User avatar
superisk
Posts: 1179
Joined: Mon May 15, 2006 11:59 am
Location: Bristol, USA
Contact:

Re: Dubstep's dead baby, Dubstep's dead

Post by superisk » Mon Sep 25, 2006 10:38 am

Mico Viejo wrote:I'm playing devil's advocate a bit, but heres something to think about:

We're starting to see Dubstep's influence spreading to other areas of music now, with people outside the scene mixing the sound with other genres, what might be considered the second stage of a scene, for example check:

www.myspace.com/spuek

www.various.co.uk

This aint neccesarily a bad thing (I'm personally feeling some of this), but stage 3 can't be far off: a David Bowie dubstep LP or some shit.

Secondly, I'm starting to wonder if Dubstep didn't die already the moment the name was coined. There's a lot of talk about how exciting the scene is cos it hasnt been locked down to any one thing yet, hasnt become formulaic. And yeah, maybe that was the case in the beginning. I bought some of the early Horsepower, Darqwan, Zed Bias stuff when it came out and din't really know what music it was, and I get the impression that they dint either. They just did it. And that stuff was exciting.

I'm rambling here, but what I wanted to say was that if u just check the first dubstep allstars LP it was diverse, exciting, more of a dark 2-step sound, but check allstars no.4 and 90% of it is pretty weak and samey. Kind of a wak white-man's reggae; hardly fukcing groundbreaking.

Its like once the name dubstep stuck everyone went "oh yeah, gots to stick some stupid skanking sounds and echoing vocals in now or it isnt dubstep".

Apart from that, I'm a little dubious as to whether its a real scene like grime is. Seems a little artificial to me, like its all just a fuss created on the internet. But maybe thats how all new forms are gonna develop now?

So, anyway, dubstep's dead, yeah: debate....
What a load of codshit :lol: Garanateed you have never heard Dubstep outside of your bedroom :!:

Analysing it constantly is not guna bring it 'back to life' in your eyes so why bother? If you care at all for the sound dig a little deeper into the quality then come back to us.

doctorkinetic
Posts: 130
Joined: Tue May 16, 2006 2:28 pm
Location: South London
Contact:

Post by doctorkinetic » Mon Sep 25, 2006 11:21 am

My two cents (dunno why i'm bothering really, just getting sucked in I guess):

As the whole drive behind the scene is really to make music that rattles your chest in a dance I feel that that is inevitably gonna lead to a certain degree of formula within the dance orientated beats. Fair play beats can be more ambient/ experimental in nature than full-on weight, but what people want is an undelying weight to the sound, and when it comes to sub-bass I feel that there are only so many forms/ rhythms that are pleasing to hear/ feel. As tunes are then built upon this it is inevitably gonna result in a degree of formula.

Perhaps i'm just being very short sighted though, perhaps there really are unlimited possibilities for this music we love :wink:
Image

deamonds
Posts: 11392
Joined: Wed Jan 25, 2006 2:18 pm

Post by deamonds » Mon Sep 25, 2006 12:25 pm

Deapoh wrote:Fuck Off
exactly what i would of said, go n listen 2 ure d'n'b u wasteman, and yes i AM kaning people who like d'n'b, now THAT is dead

digital
Posts: 746
Joined: Sat Apr 22, 2006 2:54 pm

Post by digital » Mon Sep 25, 2006 12:32 pm

deamonds wrote:
Deapoh wrote:Fuck Off
exactly what i would of said, go n listen 2 ure d'n'b u wasteman, and yes i AM kaning people who like d'n'b, now THAT is dead
Murkage

:P:

spaceboy
Posts: 1430
Joined: Fri Oct 07, 2005 6:24 pm
Location: West
Contact:

Re: Dubstep's dead baby, Dubstep's dead

Post by spaceboy » Mon Sep 25, 2006 12:45 pm

Mico Viejo wrote:I'm playing devil's advocate a bit, but heres something to think about:

We're starting to see Dubstep's influence spreading to other areas of music now, with people outside the scene mixing the sound with other genres, what might be considered the second stage of a scene, for example check:

www.myspace.com/spuek

www.various.co.uk

This aint neccesarily a bad thing (I'm personally feeling some of this), but stage 3 can't be far off: a David Bowie dubstep LP or some shit.

Secondly, I'm starting to wonder if Dubstep didn't die already the moment the name was coined. There's a lot of talk about how exciting the scene is cos it hasnt been locked down to any one thing yet, hasnt become formulaic. And yeah, maybe that was the case in the beginning. I bought some of the early Horsepower, Darqwan, Zed Bias stuff when it came out and din't really know what music it was, and I get the impression that they dint either. They just did it. And that stuff was exciting.

I'm rambling here, but what I wanted to say was that if u just check the first dubstep allstars LP it was diverse, exciting, more of a dark 2-step sound, but check allstars no.4 and 90% of it is pretty weak and samey. Kind of a wak white-man's reggae; hardly fukcing groundbreaking.

Its like once the name dubstep stuck everyone went "oh yeah, gots to stick some stupid skanking sounds and echoing vocals in now or it isnt dubstep".

Apart from that, I'm a little dubious as to whether its a real scene like grime is. Seems a little artificial to me, like its all just a fuss created on the internet. But maybe thats how all new forms are gonna develop now?

So, anyway, dubstep's dead, yeah: debate....
alot of people's lives, dreams and motivations revolve around dubstep.

i do agree with some of what you say, but why piss a whole fraternity of.

if your not set to benefit from it in whatever capacity why bother rustling feathers.

its music and entertainment. keep it at that, coz it is quite entertaining.
The World is YOURZ

User avatar
rachel
Posts: 318
Joined: Sat Jun 24, 2006 4:33 pm

Post by rachel » Mon Sep 25, 2006 1:50 pm

welcome back the 'dubstep & criticism' thread. should maybe be a sticky, just to save on server space...

really trying not to be drawn, but while dubstep is clearly alive and kicking, it's fair enuf 2 chat about the formulaic approach that's coming about in a lot of productions. ppl posting tunes all like 'is this dubstep??' shows the lack of creativity/imagination at work, and i have 2 confess to being a bit bored at fwd/dmz on occasions where it's just pure wobble and nothing else.
as the releases grow (and inevitably the % of shit tunes getting released goes up) need 2 have faith tho in the big selectors to sort the good bits from the rubbish (n-type and kode 9 my current big hopes).

Deapoh wrote:
Fuck Off


exactly what i would of said, go n listen 2 ure d'n'b u wasteman, and yes i AM kaning people who like d'n'b, now THAT is dead

dodgy first post, tru, but manners is always good init. it ain't the rinse forum u know...

doctorkinetic
Posts: 130
Joined: Tue May 16, 2006 2:28 pm
Location: South London
Contact:

Post by doctorkinetic » Mon Sep 25, 2006 2:07 pm

deamonds wrote: exactly what i would of said, go n listen 2 ure d'n'b u wasteman, and yes i AM kaning people who like d'n'b, now THAT is dead
I disagree
Image

deamonds
Posts: 11392
Joined: Wed Jan 25, 2006 2:18 pm

Post by deamonds » Mon Sep 25, 2006 2:10 pm

DoctorKinetic wrote:
deamonds wrote: exactly what i would of said, go n listen 2 ure d'n'b u wasteman, and yes i AM kaning people who like d'n'b, now THAT is dead
I disagree
1 in a million

elgato
Posts: 3671
Joined: Wed Feb 22, 2006 6:46 pm

Post by elgato » Mon Sep 25, 2006 2:10 pm

bollocks to all this attitude like, no need

what happened to the open minded heads

and discussion

forensix (mcr)
Posts: 4688
Joined: Fri Apr 07, 2006 1:58 pm
Location: Manchester
Contact:

Post by forensix (mcr) » Mon Sep 25, 2006 2:11 pm

DoctorKinetic wrote:
deamonds wrote: exactly what i would of said, go n listen 2 ure d'n'b u wasteman, and yes i AM kaning people who like d'n'b, now THAT is dead
I disagree
me too

theres a lot of shit but if you dig you'll still find gems

plus theres no need for attitude

deamonds
Posts: 11392
Joined: Wed Jan 25, 2006 2:18 pm

Post by deamonds » Mon Sep 25, 2006 2:14 pm

forensix (mcr) wrote:
DoctorKinetic wrote:
deamonds wrote: exactly what i would of said, go n listen 2 ure d'n'b u wasteman, and yes i AM kaning people who like d'n'b, now THAT is dead
I disagree
me too

theres a lot of shit but if you dig you'll still find gems

plus theres no need for attitude
oh cum on, this man is saying dubstep is dead, this calls for SOME attitude

User avatar
rachel
Posts: 318
Joined: Sat Jun 24, 2006 4:33 pm

Post by rachel » Mon Sep 25, 2006 2:18 pm

deamonds wrote:
forensix (mcr) wrote:
DoctorKinetic wrote:
deamonds wrote: exactly what i would of said, go n listen 2 ure d'n'b u wasteman, and yes i AM kaning people who like d'n'b, now THAT is dead
I disagree
me too

theres a lot of shit but if you dig you'll still find gems

plus theres no need for attitude
oh cum on, this man is saying dubstep is dead, this calls for SOME attitude
man is playing devil's advocate to provoke discusion. badly, but still. all this 'protecting our own', 'grime is entirely inferior', 'fuck off if u don't wet yrself over every nex bassline' is a bit embarassing tbh. discussion or tacit, init.

forensix (mcr)
Posts: 4688
Joined: Fri Apr 07, 2006 1:58 pm
Location: Manchester
Contact:

Post by forensix (mcr) » Mon Sep 25, 2006 2:18 pm

deamonds wrote:oh cum on, this man is saying dubstep is dead, this calls for SOME attitude
not really, if you disagree then say so and say why, dont start mouthing off

Image

deamonds
Posts: 11392
Joined: Wed Jan 25, 2006 2:18 pm

Post by deamonds » Mon Sep 25, 2006 2:24 pm

forensix (mcr) wrote:
deamonds wrote:oh cum on, this man is saying dubstep is dead, this calls for SOME attitude
not really, if you disagree then say so and say why, dont start mouthing off

Image
flower power

User avatar
rachel
Posts: 318
Joined: Sat Jun 24, 2006 4:33 pm

Post by rachel » Mon Sep 25, 2006 2:27 pm

deamonds wrote:
forensix (mcr) wrote:
deamonds wrote:oh cum on, this man is saying dubstep is dead, this calls for SOME attitude
not really, if you disagree then say so and say why, dont start mouthing off

Image
flower power
that's more like it....

forensix (mcr)
Posts: 4688
Joined: Fri Apr 07, 2006 1:58 pm
Location: Manchester
Contact:

Post by forensix (mcr) » Mon Sep 25, 2006 2:28 pm

deamonds wrote: flower power
id say its more the basis of modern society than flower power,
Last edited by forensix (mcr) on Mon Sep 25, 2006 2:36 pm, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
moderator
Posts: 152
Joined: Wed Feb 15, 2006 5:46 pm

Post by moderator » Mon Sep 25, 2006 2:33 pm

If this thread is going to be another 3 pages of bitching, it's getting locked. If people can't be critical without being rude then it's just circular logic.

Moderator

forensix (mcr)
Posts: 4688
Joined: Fri Apr 07, 2006 1:58 pm
Location: Manchester
Contact:

Post by forensix (mcr) » Mon Sep 25, 2006 2:37 pm

Moderator wrote:If this thread is going to be another 3 pages of bitching, it's getting locked. If people can't be critical without being rude then it's just circular logic.

Moderator
can people be critical without it being moved to off topic tho?

User avatar
rachel
Posts: 318
Joined: Sat Jun 24, 2006 4:33 pm

Post by rachel » Mon Sep 25, 2006 2:45 pm

forensix (mcr) wrote:
Moderator wrote:If this thread is going to be another 3 pages of bitching, it's getting locked. If people can't be critical without being rude then it's just circular logic.

Moderator
can people be critical without it being moved to off topic tho?

Locked

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests