I think the question's a bit confusing and imprecise, tbh.
Is it a good idea to make all your tunes really boring and predictable so some muppet who wanders into a dubstep night on a whim (maybe as a DJ) doesn't get confused that you've done something very slightly nonstandard and thus reduces the amount of wonga you make with the minumum of effort? No, I don't think it is.
Are you prostituting your pure artistic spirit if you think about whether a good DJ who you respect could fit your tunes in a set and get a response from an audience of people like you? To be honest, if you think that then I don't know what you're doing listening to dubstep, because throughout the history of jungle, dub, funk, soul, techno and house that idea hasn't been far from peoples' minds, and has resulted in a lot of very very good music. Unless you aren't interested in commercial whores like King Tubby, Steve Gurley, U-Roy, Juan Atkins, Congo Natty and so on...
So yeah, if you're talking about 'following the rules to the letter' and making predictable cookie cutter music then screw it, I'll do what I want. On the other hand, wanting to make a tune that I could imagine hearing and loving at a good night - something that fits the vibe but takes it somewhere new, and is predictable enough to be mixable but unpredictable enough to spin you out - is part of what I want to do, not something contradictory to it. As far as I'm concerned, breaking some of the rules is as much part of 'fitting into the dubstep genre' as following them.
here's one for you... is it better to
Forum rules
By using this "Production" sub-forum, you acknowledge that you have read, understood and agreed with our terms of use for this site. Click HERE to read them. If you do not agree to our terms of use, you must exit this site immediately. We do not accept any responsibility for the content, submissions, information or links contained herein. Users posting content here, do so completely at their own risk.
Quick Link to Feedback Forum
By using this "Production" sub-forum, you acknowledge that you have read, understood and agreed with our terms of use for this site. Click HERE to read them. If you do not agree to our terms of use, you must exit this site immediately. We do not accept any responsibility for the content, submissions, information or links contained herein. Users posting content here, do so completely at their own risk.
Quick Link to Feedback Forum
You might actually have a better chance of making it big time making tunes that don't neatly fit inside a box. I have intended on making my own personal style of music for years but it is soo much fun making dubstep tunes and then going out and rinsing them live. If I had more time I would make a lot more non genre music no doubt. But time I don't have *sigh*
cataract wrote:mate just write what you think sounds good
thats my philosophy
Totally agree here - I've made a bunch of tunes that no one likes but me
Something I notice often, is that "listeners" and fans of music will appreciate what you do more than other producers will.
[theoretic | shift | muti music | tuff love dubs]

http://adamjohnmusic.wordpress.com
http://facebook.com/adamjohnmusic

http://adamjohnmusic.wordpress.com
http://facebook.com/adamjohnmusic
-
spencertron
- Posts: 1573
- Joined: Sat Dec 22, 2007 9:30 pm
- Location: Leicester
at the moment i'm happy putting idea's/inspiration within boundaries. Every so often during the making of something, the boundaries might get breached and something i like might come out of it as a result....couldn't say what boundaries i always set myself...but i definitely don't approach a new tune with no idea for what i want to hear.
if that makes sense
you only have to listen to Stockhausen to understand the damage of the free approach...mixed bags of fruit IMO!!!![/moderately controversial
i don't mean that at all]
if that makes sense
you only have to listen to Stockhausen to understand the damage of the free approach...mixed bags of fruit IMO!!!