Midrange Cack? Yes or No? =POLL=
Forum rules
By using this "Production" sub-forum, you acknowledge that you have read, understood and agreed with our terms of use for this site. Click HERE to read them. If you do not agree to our terms of use, you must exit this site immediately. We do not accept any responsibility for the content, submissions, information or links contained herein. Users posting content here, do so completely at their own risk.
Quick Link to Feedback Forum
By using this "Production" sub-forum, you acknowledge that you have read, understood and agreed with our terms of use for this site. Click HERE to read them. If you do not agree to our terms of use, you must exit this site immediately. We do not accept any responsibility for the content, submissions, information or links contained herein. Users posting content here, do so completely at their own risk.
Quick Link to Feedback Forum
- futures_untold
- Posts: 4429
- Joined: Thu Dec 13, 2007 9:25 pm
- Location: London
- Contact:
- futures_untold
- Posts: 4429
- Joined: Thu Dec 13, 2007 9:25 pm
- Location: London
- Contact:
No need to humour you. You've concisely summed up everything that is wrong with the sound.....pengwavs wrote:okay iv seen a few people slag midrange now and im curious as to why ?..
is it because it takes minimal effort to produce ?
it hurts our ears ?
or because its been done that much that people are sick of it ?
humour me
-
deadly_habit
- Posts: 22980
- Joined: Tue Oct 24, 2006 3:41 am
- Location: MURRICA
same could be said with reesesfutures_untold wrote:No need to humour you. You've concisely summed up everything that is wrong with the sound.....pengwavs wrote:okay iv seen a few people slag midrange now and im curious as to why ?..
is it because it takes minimal effort to produce ?
it hurts our ears ?
or because its been done that much that people are sick of it ?
humour me
- futures_untold
- Posts: 4429
- Joined: Thu Dec 13, 2007 9:25 pm
- Location: London
- Contact:
True.Deadly Habit wrote:same could be said with reesesfutures_untold wrote:No need to humour you. You've concisely summed up everything that is wrong with the sound.....pengwavs wrote:okay iv seen a few people slag midrange now and im curious as to why ?..
is it because it takes minimal effort to produce ?
it hurts our ears ?
or because its been done that much that people are sick of it ?
humour me
Reeses are marginally pimped sub basses imo.
All about the hoovers!
(Just don't confuse the two....
futures_untold wrote:True.Deadly Habit wrote:same could be said with reesesfutures_untold wrote:No need to humour you. You've concisely summed up everything that is wrong with the sound.....pengwavs wrote:okay iv seen a few people slag midrange now and im curious as to why ?..
is it because it takes minimal effort to produce ?
it hurts our ears ?
or because its been done that much that people are sick of it ?
humour me
Reeses are marginally pimped sub basses imo.
All about the hoovers!
(Just don't confuse the two....)
reeses are really distorted, resampled, flanged, phased, and fucked detuned saw waves
-
deadly_habit
- Posts: 22980
- Joined: Tue Oct 24, 2006 3:41 am
- Location: MURRICA
reeses are all about the midrange and high rangefutures_untold wrote:True.Deadly Habit wrote:same could be said with reesesfutures_untold wrote:No need to humour you. You've concisely summed up everything that is wrong with the sound.....pengwavs wrote:okay iv seen a few people slag midrange now and im curious as to why ?..
is it because it takes minimal effort to produce ?
it hurts our ears ?
or because its been done that much that people are sick of it ?
humour me
Reeses are marginally pimped sub basses imo.
All about the hoovers!
(Just don't confuse the two....)
- futures_untold
- Posts: 4429
- Joined: Thu Dec 13, 2007 9:25 pm
- Location: London
- Contact:
-
deadly_habit
- Posts: 22980
- Joined: Tue Oct 24, 2006 3:41 am
- Location: MURRICA
- futures_untold
- Posts: 4429
- Joined: Thu Dec 13, 2007 9:25 pm
- Location: London
- Contact:
Yes.Deadly Habit wrote:you seem to be living in the pastfutures_untold wrote:Reeses are technically just lowpassed detuned saw waves. No fx, mid or high in those.
Some people put lots of distortion on what started out as a Reese. But then they don't really constitute a Reese any longer, more like cack
I'm going to change my name to Afraid of the Future!
coki is DEFINITELY not midrange cack. When spongebob came out in 07-- even when chef debut'd it and kept calling it "mental,"-- it was just totally stunning.yong wrote:Coki is not midrange "cack."
We just don't need most of the 4,000 or so soundalike tunes that have come since, especially since coki's got triple 6, road rage, goblin, and whatever that new white label is that's out.
I think he and DZ are the ones who are really, really killin' the peak hour, hi-energy dubstep sound. Skream as well, but in a largely different way. There's very few other tunes that even come close.
So basically-- if it's stunning it's great, and if not... sorry folks. it's cack.
twitter.com/sharmabeats
twitter.com/SubSwara
subswara.com
myspace.com/davesharma
Low Motion Records, Soul Motive, TKG, Daly City, Mercury UK
twitter.com/SubSwara
subswara.com
myspace.com/davesharma
Low Motion Records, Soul Motive, TKG, Daly City, Mercury UK
- atomik chronic
- Posts: 59
- Joined: Mon Jan 12, 2009 9:49 am
Started working on a song called Midrange Cack when I saw this thread weeks back. It's almost done. Dropping on an Internet(s) near you!
Personally I like...uh, Good Dubstep. lol. Simple City rocks and yes of fucking course it's boring when all the songs in a set sound like it.
Everyone just keep doing YOUR thing you can't help but do, that's what matters as an artist. Listening to your drive.
Personally I like...uh, Good Dubstep. lol. Simple City rocks and yes of fucking course it's boring when all the songs in a set sound like it.
Everyone just keep doing YOUR thing you can't help but do, that's what matters as an artist. Listening to your drive.
- the dub lemon
- Posts: 580
- Joined: Sat Apr 04, 2009 6:58 pm
- Location: Wales
- Contact:
Erm, actually I think you'll find there's plenty of mids and highs in detuned saw waves. Saw waves are the most harmonically rich of the basic waves (every harmonic is present at decreasing volume as you go up) and adding detuned layers puts even more harmonics inbetween. The reason reeses are so nice is because they cover such a wide frequency band leaving you with lots you can do with filters.futures_untold wrote:Reeses are technically just lowpassed detuned saw waves. No fx, mid or high in those.
Some people put lots of distortion on what started out as a Reese. But then they don't really constitute a Reese any longer, more like cack
- futures_untold
- Posts: 4429
- Joined: Thu Dec 13, 2007 9:25 pm
- Location: London
- Contact:
I agree that saw waves have plenty of frequency content across the whole spectrum, however, my first point remains.The Dub Lemon wrote:Erm, actually I think you'll find there's plenty of mids and highs in detuned saw waves. Saw waves are the most harmonically rich of the basic waves (every harmonic is present at decreasing volume as you go up) and adding detuned layers puts even more harmonics inbetween. The reason reeses are so nice is because they cover such a wide frequency band leaving you with lots you can do with filters.futures_untold wrote:Reeses are technically just lowpassed detuned saw waves. No fx, mid or high in those.
Some people put lots of distortion on what started out as a Reese. But then they don't really constitute a Reese any longer, more like cack
futures_untold wrote:Reeses are technically just lowpassed detuned saw waves. No fx, (and due to having been lowpass filtered), no mids or highs in those.
Some people put lots of distortion on what started out as a Reese. But then they don't really constitute a Reese any longer, more like cack
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests

