Serox wrote:
Dubstep was never about screaming distorted noises with 50 layers. I was never much of a fan of DnB but I did hear it quite a lot and the common whine I heard from people was that it went down that horrible noisy path.
Thats what I mean though, when you say that dubstep is about something, you are limiting what it can be. Personally I dont care whether its called dubstep, dubcore, fuckstep, alpacatron, whatever. I get that you dont like it, but then again, they aren't making music for you. I want people to take "dubstep" and push it so far out of the norms that it would be hard to classify as the same genre anymore, but thats my personal aesthetic. There's plenty of dark atmoshperic stuff out there, there's plenty of chill dubby stuff out there, there's plenty of dancey stuff out there. Listen to what you like.
Oh yeah, and IDM...

thats where terrible music lies....if it were not for IDM's experiments in the 90's so much of what makes up the musical language of electronic music today would not have been invented. Not all music has to be about someone "jamming" and creating something that is enjoyable on an immediate and traditional musical level. I mean, if we didnt have people geeking out in front of their computers, trying new things, where would we be? Curtis Roads invented granular synthesis in the 70's using a computer he had to program with punch cards and wait weeks for it to render 15 seconds of audio. cant get much geeky-er than that, but he is well respected in the electronic music community. I guess I'm just trying to get across that people should have more open minds when listening to music. 95% of the time, there is something there that you can appreciate on some level, even if you dont like it as a whole. I would think that you would be able to at least hear the amount of care put into crafting and arranging those sounds, even if you see them as just a bunch of sounds stuck on a grid.