7/7 bombings BBC conspiracy files
Forum rules
Please read and follow this sub-forum's specific rules listed HERE, as well as our sitewide rules listed HERE.
Link to the Secret Ninja Sessions community ustream channel - info in this thread
Please read and follow this sub-forum's specific rules listed HERE, as well as our sitewide rules listed HERE.
Link to the Secret Ninja Sessions community ustream channel - info in this thread
7/7 bombings BBC conspiracy files
anyone watch this? probably the most one sided, biased thing ive ever seen, fucking joke
Soundcloudfinji wrote:Hey hackman your a fucking nutter
this guy sums it up better than me in another forum:
Originally Posted by danny fremen
There was an email exchange between Muad'Dib and the BBC people producing the Conspiracy Files program, prior to the "ambush" on the street. Terms were not agreed for Muad'Dib's participation in the program. He wanted a guarantee that they would show 7/7 Ripple Effect on prime time, and then He would take part in their program. So that even if they did make a hit-piece (like they have done), the truth would already have been shown to the British people.
Then; in full knowledge that terms had not been agreed; they went and started filming Him to use the footage in their program, asking Him all sorts of insinuating and downright baffling questions. This is why He refused to speak a word to them and passed by them. They have no honour.
The makers of this BBC program are liars because they pretended to set out to genuinely appraise the alternative theories concerning 7/7. But that footage of Muad'Dib on the street was filmed a year ago, in Summer of 2008. Did you notice the "reporter" accusing Muad'Dib of lying about innocent people? ONE YEAR AGO?
So they never had ANY intention of being fair, right from the start. They didn't bother telling you, the viewer, that the footage was a year old, in order to protect the illusion of their impartiality.
Another deception was them presenting the incident they themselves fabricated, as them "exposing" Muad'Dib as a white man from Sheffield. To the hundreds of thousands who knew Muad'Dib or had heard of Him before, this was not a surprise. He has NEVER denied being a white man from Sheffield! But we do not exist or are irrelevant to the British Bullshitting Corporation. The revelation of who He is, is not new at all, and has been publicly available knowledge since TWENTY-THREE years ago, when Muad'Dib wrote the book "The Way home or face The Fire". If a substantial number of people have only been exposed to this fact now, it has a lot to do with the very same BBC stonewalling Him for all those years until they could no longer pretend He does not exist.
They are now obviously afraid of the impact that 7/7 Ripple Effect is having, and judged that more damage would be incurred by ignoring it than by attempting to colour it the way they want people to see it. The latter being what they set out to do in their program. But; having seen it; I reckon they have shot themselves in the foot. The ripple effect is becoming a tidal wave and cannot be stopped either by them sticking their heads in the sand or by attacking it with weak ad-hominem arguments. All they have done is feed the wave, accelerate it.
Anyone else notice that Canary Wharf wasn't mentioned even once? I wonder why.
Anyone notice that the interviewer did not ask Peter Power: "if it was only an office exercise with no bearing on what took place, then why did you say 'we had to jump from slow-time thinking to quick-time doing'?".
"We had to suddenly switch the exercise from fictional to real" - Peter Power.
"We had to jump from slow-time thinking to quick-time doing" - Peter Power.
Just an office exercise aye Peter??
And how about the laughable assertion that the four Muslim men dropped their ID's away from the blast locations so that they would be found intact and everyone would know who did it? Talk about clutching at straws aye?
Let's be clear - if they really were terrorists who wanted everyone to know they did it, then they would have specified their targets in the videos. They would also not have made the videos in 2004 because there would be a risk of the videos being found prior to the attack. They would have filmed themselves the night before the attack, or the very morning of the attack. Leaving ID's at the scene, when there would possibly be hundreds of other ID's belonging to other people, would not provide a reasonable signature of who-dun-it. Not to mention that Mohammed Sidique Khan's ID was found in three separate blast locations according to the official report. This makes no sense unless someone planted it, after the event, and this also was not addressed in the BBC hit-piece. You see, why would two terrorists who wanted everyone to be SURE who did it; according to the BBC; carry ID belonging to a third terrorist, when this would only cause a big question mark in people's minds about whether or not this meant the evidence was planted by another party?
The Truth MAKES SENSE. Lies don't. That's how you know it's the Truth.
This Conspiracy Files program helped to drive home what is said in 7/7 Ripple Effect about the BBC being a government propaganda organ and that it lies to the British people. For doing such a good job of that, I'm very grateful.
Originally Posted by danny fremen
There was an email exchange between Muad'Dib and the BBC people producing the Conspiracy Files program, prior to the "ambush" on the street. Terms were not agreed for Muad'Dib's participation in the program. He wanted a guarantee that they would show 7/7 Ripple Effect on prime time, and then He would take part in their program. So that even if they did make a hit-piece (like they have done), the truth would already have been shown to the British people.
Then; in full knowledge that terms had not been agreed; they went and started filming Him to use the footage in their program, asking Him all sorts of insinuating and downright baffling questions. This is why He refused to speak a word to them and passed by them. They have no honour.
The makers of this BBC program are liars because they pretended to set out to genuinely appraise the alternative theories concerning 7/7. But that footage of Muad'Dib on the street was filmed a year ago, in Summer of 2008. Did you notice the "reporter" accusing Muad'Dib of lying about innocent people? ONE YEAR AGO?
So they never had ANY intention of being fair, right from the start. They didn't bother telling you, the viewer, that the footage was a year old, in order to protect the illusion of their impartiality.
Another deception was them presenting the incident they themselves fabricated, as them "exposing" Muad'Dib as a white man from Sheffield. To the hundreds of thousands who knew Muad'Dib or had heard of Him before, this was not a surprise. He has NEVER denied being a white man from Sheffield! But we do not exist or are irrelevant to the British Bullshitting Corporation. The revelation of who He is, is not new at all, and has been publicly available knowledge since TWENTY-THREE years ago, when Muad'Dib wrote the book "The Way home or face The Fire". If a substantial number of people have only been exposed to this fact now, it has a lot to do with the very same BBC stonewalling Him for all those years until they could no longer pretend He does not exist.
They are now obviously afraid of the impact that 7/7 Ripple Effect is having, and judged that more damage would be incurred by ignoring it than by attempting to colour it the way they want people to see it. The latter being what they set out to do in their program. But; having seen it; I reckon they have shot themselves in the foot. The ripple effect is becoming a tidal wave and cannot be stopped either by them sticking their heads in the sand or by attacking it with weak ad-hominem arguments. All they have done is feed the wave, accelerate it.
Anyone else notice that Canary Wharf wasn't mentioned even once? I wonder why.
Anyone notice that the interviewer did not ask Peter Power: "if it was only an office exercise with no bearing on what took place, then why did you say 'we had to jump from slow-time thinking to quick-time doing'?".
"We had to suddenly switch the exercise from fictional to real" - Peter Power.
"We had to jump from slow-time thinking to quick-time doing" - Peter Power.
Just an office exercise aye Peter??
And how about the laughable assertion that the four Muslim men dropped their ID's away from the blast locations so that they would be found intact and everyone would know who did it? Talk about clutching at straws aye?
Let's be clear - if they really were terrorists who wanted everyone to know they did it, then they would have specified their targets in the videos. They would also not have made the videos in 2004 because there would be a risk of the videos being found prior to the attack. They would have filmed themselves the night before the attack, or the very morning of the attack. Leaving ID's at the scene, when there would possibly be hundreds of other ID's belonging to other people, would not provide a reasonable signature of who-dun-it. Not to mention that Mohammed Sidique Khan's ID was found in three separate blast locations according to the official report. This makes no sense unless someone planted it, after the event, and this also was not addressed in the BBC hit-piece. You see, why would two terrorists who wanted everyone to be SURE who did it; according to the BBC; carry ID belonging to a third terrorist, when this would only cause a big question mark in people's minds about whether or not this meant the evidence was planted by another party?
The Truth MAKES SENSE. Lies don't. That's how you know it's the Truth.
This Conspiracy Files program helped to drive home what is said in 7/7 Ripple Effect about the BBC being a government propaganda organ and that it lies to the British people. For doing such a good job of that, I'm very grateful.
Soundcloudfinji wrote:Hey hackman your a fucking nutter
and sorry, unbelievable coincidence that there were practices for the same stations that were bombed on the same day?

Soundcloudfinji wrote:Hey hackman your a fucking nutter
of course the government aren't gonna allow somthing that may expose their lies on prime time TV, so they took it to their advantage and made them look crazy on national TV.
And come lets be fucking honest here, if there were really terrorists trying to strike fear into the UK and US, they could EASILY do it time and time again. It can not be that hard to walk, with a back pack into a crowded area and blow themselves up. It happens in the middle east all the time. No matter how much security we have it could easily happen. It's funny how this stuff only happens just before a war and provides the perfect excuse.
Just like when USA sent a ship into german waters during WWI, which conveintly it got sunk by the germans and then USA had their reason.
Just like when USA pissed the japs of on purpose and were even informed of a fleet of jap planes heading over the pacific. "oh no pearl habour we never saw it comming". (nice propaganda film 'Pearl Habour' to boost that american patriosism by the way USA, during the early stages of afgahn/iraq war, good timing)
just like when an american vessel got sunk by the veitnmeise (which later, USA admitted never atcually happened)
just like 9/11.
I'm sure theres so much more, it's so blatent this world is corrupt and it fucks me of that we cannot do shit all about it & the amount of people who are oblivious to it.
And come lets be fucking honest here, if there were really terrorists trying to strike fear into the UK and US, they could EASILY do it time and time again. It can not be that hard to walk, with a back pack into a crowded area and blow themselves up. It happens in the middle east all the time. No matter how much security we have it could easily happen. It's funny how this stuff only happens just before a war and provides the perfect excuse.
Just like when USA sent a ship into german waters during WWI, which conveintly it got sunk by the germans and then USA had their reason.
Just like when USA pissed the japs of on purpose and were even informed of a fleet of jap planes heading over the pacific. "oh no pearl habour we never saw it comming". (nice propaganda film 'Pearl Habour' to boost that american patriosism by the way USA, during the early stages of afgahn/iraq war, good timing)
just like when an american vessel got sunk by the veitnmeise (which later, USA admitted never atcually happened)
just like 9/11.
I'm sure theres so much more, it's so blatent this world is corrupt and it fucks me of that we cannot do shit all about it & the amount of people who are oblivious to it.
http://www.myspace.com/oskydub
firky wrote:Blood, guts, and stuff like that doesn't phase me. I have seen the body of a woman who cut her throat open with a tile and although that burned an image in my head that will never leave, it did not make me gag or feel sick. However.... ginger people make me fucking sick.
innit, but it just made me so angry to watch that, and so much more angry that millions of people are going to/have seen it and believe itOsky wrote:of course the government aren't gonna allow somthing that may expose their lies on prime time TV, so they took it to their advantage and made them look crazy on national TV.
it
Soundcloudfinji wrote:Hey hackman your a fucking nutter
- ill boding
- Posts: 92
- Joined: Sat Jan 17, 2009 10:15 pm
- Location: uk
- Contact:
didnt see that one i seen one or two of them programs and they just seem to spend most the time trying to disprove theories instead of researching them properly. i gotta look into the whole 7/7 thing more i do know there are some inconsistencies with the official story and the fact they wont hold a public inquiry is nuff dodgy
yeah exactly, the funniest thing was that of about 2 people they used in in the program who believed that the official story was false, the main one was a holocaust denier, making the whole argument seem ridiculous, when they could of used hundreds of different people, who of course realize the holocaust did happen
also that Rachel north is the biggest bitch ive ever seen, acid tongue, inciting racial hatred to an extent. Imo a government plant, does it not seem strange that the day after possibly the most traumatizing thing ever shes writing online for the government or whatever?
also that Rachel north is the biggest bitch ive ever seen, acid tongue, inciting racial hatred to an extent. Imo a government plant, does it not seem strange that the day after possibly the most traumatizing thing ever shes writing online for the government or whatever?
Soundcloudfinji wrote:Hey hackman your a fucking nutter
havn't seen this program but I'm pretty aware of all this shit..
I'm polish and in here everything comes a bit later and so on but the fact that usa is just a tool in hand of few psychopath bastards is obvious for many peeps.. :/
In fact I think that most of the decisions about this world still comes out of UK, maybe not directly but there are many very wealthy families, royal blood lines who want to stay in power forever...
anybody of u ever heard about codex alimentarius ?? they want to put new food regulations in order in december this year.. when you read it it's pretty fuckin scary.. :/
population control program is in progress now..
fuckin psychos, they stand no chance but there will be a big mess everywhere around sooner than most of the ppl expect......
I'm polish and in here everything comes a bit later and so on but the fact that usa is just a tool in hand of few psychopath bastards is obvious for many peeps.. :/
In fact I think that most of the decisions about this world still comes out of UK, maybe not directly but there are many very wealthy families, royal blood lines who want to stay in power forever...
anybody of u ever heard about codex alimentarius ?? they want to put new food regulations in order in december this year.. when you read it it's pretty fuckin scary.. :/
population control program is in progress now..
fuckin psychos, they stand no chance but there will be a big mess everywhere around sooner than most of the ppl expect......
- octave_noize
- Posts: 263
- Joined: Thu Dec 21, 2006 4:09 pm
- Location: Cambridge/Southampton/The Hague
- Contact:
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests
