Out of everything I've ever seen on the internet, that post possibly offends me the most XDMico Viejo wrote:depends what u mean by "good". if u mean technically okay but working in a musical genre they didnt invent and havent really contributed anythign new to beyond finally quitting putting on an american accent, then yeah. if on the other hand u think that 4something 2b good it needs to be original, fresh, exciting, genuine, forward-thinking and appropriate for the time and place in which its created (i.e not still fucking harping back to some golden age of hip hop in the bronx 1981) then no. they're mostly shit.Naus wrote:theres alot of good uk hip hop artist out there that are in no way connected to grime.
grime IS uk hip hop. that other thing ppl call uk hip hop is mostly just substandard american hip hop made by some english ppl. and we dont even have the excuse the french have (who also produce just american hip hop, and mostly comemercial shit at that) in that they dont understand the lyrics of the original so they need to make their own.
if u want hip hop then listen to the real thing. if u want good, original british MCing... then there is only grime.[/i]
The differences between american and uk hip hop are vast.
American hip hop - Upbeat backing tracks, large amount of focus on the rappers flow, lyrical content either about the rapper themselves or some pop culture ideal and also imo more simple production techniques.
Uk hip hop - Darker/melancholy backing beats, large focus on the LYRICS of the rapper with a tendency to use lots of metaphor and double similie type things, lyrical content generally political, more complex/interesting production.
I find it strange because to me american hip hop has been dwindling for years in its little rut where nothing inovative or different has come out for ages but uk hip hop is where all of the new forward thinking ideas are being put to use.
http://www.myspace.com/rhymeasylum <<<<No american artist stands up to them or tons of other people I could pull up...