Mate, if you need to know ANYTHING about reaper then ask Futures Untold. He is a fountain of knowledge on the subject.....rich w wrote:Cheers for all the replies. Looks like Ableton is the way to go - anyone know if the LE version has the warp feature cos money's a bit of an issue at the moment!
I've also heard that Reaper is quite good for this and its cheap - anyone used this before?
New to the forum - How do you get accappellas in time?
Forum rules
By using this "Production" sub-forum, you acknowledge that you have read, understood and agreed with our terms of use for this site. Click HERE to read them. If you do not agree to our terms of use, you must exit this site immediately. We do not accept any responsibility for the content, submissions, information or links contained herein. Users posting content here, do so completely at their own risk.
Quick Link to Feedback Forum
By using this "Production" sub-forum, you acknowledge that you have read, understood and agreed with our terms of use for this site. Click HERE to read them. If you do not agree to our terms of use, you must exit this site immediately. We do not accept any responsibility for the content, submissions, information or links contained herein. Users posting content here, do so completely at their own risk.
Quick Link to Feedback Forum
-
__________
- Posts: 6338
- Joined: Tue Mar 06, 2007 5:51 pm
no need for ableton at all. anything with a pitch control can do it!
if you're talking about using ableton's timestretching function and shit, that's not going to sound as good as beatmatching the acapella anyway. you'd be better off doing it the long way by getting it perfectly in time on the pitch fader, and not timestretching it.
get the original track that the acapella is from, and beatmatch that to the beat you want to lay the acapella over, then take a note of the +/- of the pitch fader. remove the track with the vocals, replace it with the acapella, change the pitch of the acapella to the same as the beatmatched track with the same vocal. done.
if you know the track well enough, you should be able to tell when its in time and where the bars line up. when the mc goes into the chorus or whatever, it should be on a 16...simple really!
bottom line for me - its easier to get an acapella in time on a set of 1210's than ableton. don't make it confusing, there's no need!
if you're talking about using ableton's timestretching function and shit, that's not going to sound as good as beatmatching the acapella anyway. you'd be better off doing it the long way by getting it perfectly in time on the pitch fader, and not timestretching it.
get the original track that the acapella is from, and beatmatch that to the beat you want to lay the acapella over, then take a note of the +/- of the pitch fader. remove the track with the vocals, replace it with the acapella, change the pitch of the acapella to the same as the beatmatched track with the same vocal. done.
if you know the track well enough, you should be able to tell when its in time and where the bars line up. when the mc goes into the chorus or whatever, it should be on a 16...simple really!
bottom line for me - its easier to get an acapella in time on a set of 1210's than ableton. don't make it confusing, there's no need!
sorry this is way wrong.ableton is much easier and sounds much better.£10 Bag wrote:no need for ableton at all. anything with a pitch control can do it!
if you're talking about using ableton's timestretching function and shit, that's not going to sound as good as beatmatching the acapella anyway. you'd be better off doing it the long way by getting it perfectly in time on the pitch fader, and not timestretching it.
get the original track that the acapella is from, and beatmatch that to the beat you want to lay the acapella over, then take a note of the +/- of the pitch fader. remove the track with the vocals, replace it with the acapella, change the pitch of the acapella to the same as the beatmatched track with the same vocal. done.
if you know the track well enough, you should be able to tell when its in time and where the bars line up. when the mc goes into the chorus or whatever, it should be on a 16...simple really!
bottom line for me - its easier to get an acapella in time on a set of 1210's than ableton. don't make it confusing, there's no need!
Ableton isn't confusing£10 Bag wrote:no need for ableton at all. anything with a pitch control can do it!
if you're talking about using ableton's timestretching function and shit, that's not going to sound as good as beatmatching the acapella anyway. you'd be better off doing it the long way by getting it perfectly in time on the pitch fader, and not timestretching it.
get the original track that the acapella is from, and beatmatch that to the beat you want to lay the acapella over, then take a note of the +/- of the pitch fader. remove the track with the vocals, replace it with the acapella, change the pitch of the acapella to the same as the beatmatched track with the same vocal. done.
if you know the track well enough, you should be able to tell when its in time and where the bars line up. when the mc goes into the chorus or whatever, it should be on a 16...simple really!
bottom line for me - its easier to get an acapella in time on a set of 1210's than ableton. don't make it confusing, there's no need!
What happens when your acapella is 120 bpm and you want to make a dubstep tune? Chipmunks haven't been in style since '93.
EDIT oh and your method would surely put your acapella in between keys. It would suck having to adjust each track you add by cents in order to keep everything in key. Not sure you have thought this thing through properly.
- hurlingdervish
- Posts: 2971
- Joined: Wed May 20, 2009 7:37 pm
Ya, ableton warping is much easier then going through the whole beatmatch scenario.
my opinion anyway.
my opinion anyway.
[theoretic | shift | muti music | tuff love dubs]

http://adamjohnmusic.wordpress.com
http://facebook.com/adamjohnmusic

http://adamjohnmusic.wordpress.com
http://facebook.com/adamjohnmusic
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests
