The sound of now
Forum rules
By using this "Production" sub-forum, you acknowledge that you have read, understood and agreed with our terms of use for this site. Click HERE to read them. If you do not agree to our terms of use, you must exit this site immediately. We do not accept any responsibility for the content, submissions, information or links contained herein. Users posting content here, do so completely at their own risk.
Quick Link to Feedback Forum
By using this "Production" sub-forum, you acknowledge that you have read, understood and agreed with our terms of use for this site. Click HERE to read them. If you do not agree to our terms of use, you must exit this site immediately. We do not accept any responsibility for the content, submissions, information or links contained herein. Users posting content here, do so completely at their own risk.
Quick Link to Feedback Forum
The sound of now
Many producers(me on occasion) use certain sounds and or techniques to place a track in a certain era. what sounds/techniques do you think producers of the future will use when trying to make their tracks sound like they come from.. now? ?
Firky wrote:Another time I came downstairs with a hangover to find what looked like an exploded otter in the karzi and she was passed out on the sofa.
- hurlingdervish
- Posts: 2971
- Joined: Wed May 20, 2009 7:37 pm
-
- Posts: 230
- Joined: Tue Jan 17, 2006 3:22 pm
i'm not sure u really understood the question.hurlingdervish wrote:midi that plugs into your vocal chords so you can play your voice as a synthesizer.
yeah, i was thinking bout this the other day: people in 15 years are gonna be hunting down old "vintage" copies of fruity loops and entering ebay bidding wars for the future music dubstep DVD just to get that "authentic" sound.
stupid.
same as using exclusively old technology now is. tho i got nothing against mixing up new with the old. but seriously, the music that we respect from the past is generally the music that was looking toward the future when it was made. not some retro shit.
- tripwire22
- Posts: 2384
- Joined: Wed Mar 25, 2009 11:30 pm
- Location: United States
- Contact:
Pendulum
jackmaster wrote:you went in with this mix.
Soundcloud.onelove. wrote:There needs to be a DZA app on iPhone just for id'ing old Grime tracks.
http://soundcloud.com/keepitgully http://www.mixcloud.com/slevarance/
-
- Posts: 17
- Joined: Mon Apr 06, 2009 9:06 pm
think he meant auto-tunehurlingdervish wrote:midi that plugs into your vocal chords so you can play your voice as a synthesizer.
ala - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tBb4cjjj1gI or any t-pain stuff
brutal electro is still the sound!
- hurlingdervish
- Posts: 2971
- Joined: Wed May 20, 2009 7:37 pm
nah man didn't mean autotunebrightondubhead wrote:think he meant auto-tunehurlingdervish wrote:midi that plugs into your vocal chords so you can play your voice as a synthesizer.
ala - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tBb4cjjj1gI or any t-pain stuff
brutal electro is still the sound!
i dont think we will be nostalgic from here on out, there will always be new advancements and that will be the sound
if anything they will look back on now and go "that stuff sounded like absolute shit, too bad they didn't know about _____ yet."
moores law son. moores law.
-
- Posts: 230
- Joined: Tue Jan 17, 2006 3:22 pm
pfff, you dont know much about the history of music do you? or the history of man kind for that matter...hurlingdervish wrote: i dont think we will be nostalgic from here on out, there will always be new advancements and that will be the sound.
sorry, not got anything against you personally, but this is complete nonsense. in every single period of human history there have always been a large number of people (perhaps even a majority) who harp back to a "golden age" when everything was deemed to be better.
of course, it wasnt any better (or worse 4that matter), it was just...different.
this is not about to change
- hurlingdervish
- Posts: 2971
- Joined: Wed May 20, 2009 7:37 pm
i know alot of music history but you cant compare now to 100 years ago or even 10 years ago, electronic music is entirely different then the history of rock and roll, jazz, classical, etcMico Viejo wrote:pfff, you dont know much about the history of music do you? or the history of man kind for that matter...hurlingdervish wrote: i dont think we will be nostalgic from here on out, there will always be new advancements and that will be the sound.
sorry, not got anything against you personally, but this is complete nonsense. in every single period of human history there have always been a large number of people (perhaps even a majority) who harp back to a "golden age" when everything was deemed to be better.
of course, it wasnt any better (or worse 4that matter), it was just...different.
this is not about to change
things are changing so rapidly that people will care more of whats coming thats new rather than something that is old. this is a trend that has been continuing in the last few years especially in the electronic music realm. do you think someone would be nostalgic for the kaoss pad one when the kaoss pad 10000 is out? since its a digital device theres not really any benefit to the old version. these are different times
many things await us in music culture that we cannot see (moog guitar is an example of ridiculous advances)
that there will always be something new to focus on
there are many negatives to that, but it is the truth and the path we are on.
dont you look foward to the release of the next version of your DAW? even though you can make music fine with the one you have, the next one always looks better, would you retreat to the version that came out 4 years ago? i highly doubt it. in analog gear yes, but not in the world of soft synths and virtual studios
I think other dood is right. You are way off. There are nods to late 90's (10 years ago) music as well as any time period. You would be daft to think that people won't 10 years from now make a late 00's sounding tune. The question is, what defines the current sound? Not easy to answer and tbh I think we first need to hear what gets dropped for the 10's sound that makes it different. Like maybe it will simply be that straight 8th note half step sound? Maybe going forward it will all be triplet groove and full step? Maybe we get away from the 200hz snare and side chaining? To hard to say.hurlingdervish wrote:i know alot of music history but you cant compare now to 100 years ago or even 10 years ago, electronic music is entirely different then the history of rock and roll, jazz, classical, etcMico Viejo wrote:pfff, you dont know much about the history of music do you? or the history of man kind for that matter...hurlingdervish wrote: i dont think we will be nostalgic from here on out, there will always be new advancements and that will be the sound.
sorry, not got anything against you personally, but this is complete nonsense. in every single period of human history there have always been a large number of people (perhaps even a majority) who harp back to a "golden age" when everything was deemed to be better.
of course, it wasnt any better (or worse 4that matter), it was just...different.
this is not about to change
things are changing so rapidly that people will care more of whats coming thats new rather than something that is old. this is a trend that has been continuing in the last few years especially in the electronic music realm. do you think someone would be nostalgic for the kaoss pad one when the kaoss pad 10000 is out? since its a digital device theres not really any benefit to the old version. these are different times
many things await us in music culture that we cannot see (moog guitar is an example of ridiculous advances)
that there will always be something new to focus on
there are many negatives to that, but it is the truth and the path we are on.
dont you look foward to the release of the next version of your DAW? even though you can make music fine with the one you have, the next one always looks better, would you retreat to the version that came out 4 years ago? i highly doubt it. in analog gear yes, but not in the world of soft synths and virtual studios
-
- Posts: 230
- Joined: Tue Jan 17, 2006 3:22 pm
yeah, course. but i wasnt suggesting I was one of these retro obsessed people.hurlingdervish wrote: dont you look foward to the release of the next version of your DAW?
meanwhile there ARE currently people buying up old akai or emu samplers to get that authentic 90s sound (and there are a hell of a lot more who are a little less extremist but are still trying emulate these sounds using plug ins or whatever).
i see this on forums all the time. just on KVR in the last 2 weeks there have been seperate threads on "old samples" (whatevr the fuck they are), Fairlight samplers, and people wanting sounds from amiga computers and shit. there r whole subgenre's of electronic music dedicated to reviving outdated technology (8 bit stuff, hip hop that's still looking for that classic 12bit 90s sound...). even on here there's plenty of ppl wanting to know how to get those 2-step drums, or a jungle basslines sounding liek the original back in the day. and the dominant sound of the last few years in mainstream electronica has just been 80s revival. this shit is not gonna stop.
of course, there r always loads of ppl who r more forward thinkign as well, and there still will be in the future. but thats not who the OP was talkign about.
and altho i wasnt actually serious about a fruity loops revival, stranger things have happened.
-
- Posts: 17
- Joined: Mon Apr 06, 2009 9:06 pm
dunno man, we can all agree jungle was in the past yet the likes of silkie re-introduce jungle in some of their dubstep tracks. Lets not forget dubstep (somthing newish) really came from garage and 2 step....you are right about technologies though, but just because electronic music came from technology, it doesnt mean the ideas and influences also follow the fast advancements in technology.hurlingdervish wrote:i know alot of music history but you cant compare now to 100 years ago or even 10 years ago, electronic music is entirely different then the history of rock and roll, jazz, classical, etcMico Viejo wrote:pfff, you dont know much about the history of music do you? or the history of man kind for that matter...hurlingdervish wrote: i dont think we will be nostalgic from here on out, there will always be new advancements and that will be the sound.
sorry, not got anything against you personally, but this is complete nonsense. in every single period of human history there have always been a large number of people (perhaps even a majority) who harp back to a "golden age" when everything was deemed to be better.
of course, it wasnt any better (or worse 4that matter), it was just...different.
this is not about to change
things are changing so rapidly that people will care more of whats coming thats new rather than something that is old. this is a trend that has been continuing in the last few years especially in the electronic music realm. do you think someone would be nostalgic for the kaoss pad one when the kaoss pad 10000 is out? since its a digital device theres not really any benefit to the old version. these are different times
many things await us in music culture that we cannot see (moog guitar is an example of ridiculous advances)
that there will always be something new to focus on
there are many negatives to that, but it is the truth and the path we are on.
dont you look foward to the release of the next version of your DAW? even though you can make music fine with the one you have, the next one always looks better, would you retreat to the version that came out 4 years ago? i highly doubt it. in analog gear yes, but not in the world of soft synths and virtual studios
-
- Posts: 230
- Joined: Tue Jan 17, 2006 3:22 pm
good pointabZ wrote:I think we first need to hear what gets dropped for the 10's sound that makes it different.
slightly off topic, but something funny i noticed with revival off past styles is that often all kinds of random shit gets bunched together that would never have been in the same track at the time. like some1 is into "80s" sounds, so they just randomly pick any old 80s production techniques and throw them all together, whereas of course at the time (like in any other decade) there wasnt just ONE sound, but many different subcultures. like i see these 80s revival fashion fools putting on some fucking goth styles with old hip hop or metal styles and (hmmm, Justice again), whereas in reality these different subcultures all would have hated each other at the time.
nothing wrong with that i guess. but it means that in 20 years u'll probably get half step breaks with electroclash basslines and post-punk indie guitars or soemthing
- hurlingdervish
- Posts: 2971
- Joined: Wed May 20, 2009 7:37 pm
well maybe it wont follow as fast in the underground, but look at the use and abuse of autotune when it became extremely easy to usebrightondubhead wrote:
dunno man, we can all agree jungle was in the past yet the likes of silkie re-introduce jungle in some of their dubstep tracks. Lets not forget dubstep (somthing newish) really came from garage and 2 step....you are right about technologies though, but just because electronic music came from technology, it doesnt mean the ideas and influences also follow the fast advancements in technology.
anything new that comes out is bound to be done to death, most people are sick of wobbles by now...
hell when and if melodyne comes out we may grow to hate the sound going "ahhh another fuckin melodyne track"
- dronehymns
- Posts: 29
- Joined: Fri Aug 07, 2009 7:48 pm
- Location: Dirty Jerz
- Contact:
-
- Posts: 6830
- Joined: Mon Oct 01, 2007 11:25 pm
- Location: First dsf male lesbian/Savannah, GA
This sounds AWESOME.Mico Viejo wrote: half step breaks with electroclash basslines and post-punk indie guitars
http://soundcloud.com/helixdelay
kejk wrote:I prefer the pooper
- tripaddict
- Posts: 2417
- Joined: Fri Aug 07, 2009 11:53 pm
- Location: Midlands, UK
- Contact:
- hurlingdervish
- Posts: 2971
- Joined: Wed May 20, 2009 7:37 pm
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests