LP/HP vs EQing uwanted peaks
Forum rules
By using this "Production" sub-forum, you acknowledge that you have read, understood and agreed with our terms of use for this site. Click HERE to read them. If you do not agree to our terms of use, you must exit this site immediately. We do not accept any responsibility for the content, submissions, information or links contained herein. Users posting content here, do so completely at their own risk.
Quick Link to Feedback Forum
By using this "Production" sub-forum, you acknowledge that you have read, understood and agreed with our terms of use for this site. Click HERE to read them. If you do not agree to our terms of use, you must exit this site immediately. We do not accept any responsibility for the content, submissions, information or links contained herein. Users posting content here, do so completely at their own risk.
Quick Link to Feedback Forum
LP/HP vs EQing uwanted peaks
Let's say you have a nice sound with its main part at about 500Hz-1000Hz but at the 200hz region you have another high peak. Now you don't want the 200Hz peak. What do you do to get rid of it? Do you put a steep HP filter below 500Hz to clean out the 200Hz Peak or do you think its better to use an EQ with like -12dB or more and a small Q on that specific unwantet frequency?
I usually take just a steep HP filter and just low cut evrything i don't want and it's ok, but some people like to just decrease that unwanted peak with an EQ. Does it maybe give a more natural sound if you just EQ the unwanted peak down and let those other frequencies below that peak be as they were? Or do you prefer to just massively HP/LP the unwanted stuff away? (thats what i usually do..)
"It depends..." I know, but please can anyone tell about the general pros and cons of specific EQing vs just heavy filtering? (especially in terms of keeping sound natural!). thx!
I usually take just a steep HP filter and just low cut evrything i don't want and it's ok, but some people like to just decrease that unwanted peak with an EQ. Does it maybe give a more natural sound if you just EQ the unwanted peak down and let those other frequencies below that peak be as they were? Or do you prefer to just massively HP/LP the unwanted stuff away? (thats what i usually do..)
"It depends..." I know, but please can anyone tell about the general pros and cons of specific EQing vs just heavy filtering? (especially in terms of keeping sound natural!). thx!
-
deadly_habit
- Posts: 22980
- Joined: Tue Oct 24, 2006 3:41 am
- Location: MURRICA
exactly!!! its like a jigsaw, everything has its own place! i wish more people realised this than limiting everything to shit!Deadly Habit wrote: loud mixdowns come from each element having its own range in freq band
but on ure question i am really anal about rolling off low frequencies (maybe a bit too much!) and it can affect the natural sound of the sample. however i only really do those big cuts on selected frequencies when it is either the frequency is really ringing or if in the analyzer its a bit too spiky!
so my solution to ure problem would be to roll the lower freqs off but do it with a sloped eq so still get some of the lower frequncies!
Yes, I guess so.nowaysj wrote:Is that your fundamental down there at 200?
..ok, so I see it's apparently not too bad to use HP and LP filters rather than to use peaking EQs. I was just wondering, seeing those people with their really sophisticated looking EQ settings, while I often am almost straight bandpassing stuff to make it sit right
-
scooterjack
- Posts: 415
- Joined: Mon Jan 12, 2009 4:38 am
-
deadly_habit
- Posts: 22980
- Joined: Tue Oct 24, 2006 3:41 am
- Location: MURRICA
-
scooterjack
- Posts: 415
- Joined: Mon Jan 12, 2009 4:38 am
-
deadly_habit
- Posts: 22980
- Joined: Tue Oct 24, 2006 3:41 am
- Location: MURRICA
def a filter is for more extreme cuts than sub eqingScooterJack wrote:yes it does depend, but always using a hp/lp is wrong, plain and simpleDeadly Habit wrote:as always dependsScooterJack wrote:you need to learn proper subtractive eqing, using a LP/HP is overkill and most likely destroying the harmonics in your samples
depends on the noise floor
-
scooterjack
- Posts: 415
- Joined: Mon Jan 12, 2009 4:38 am
-
scooterjack
- Posts: 415
- Joined: Mon Jan 12, 2009 4:38 am
high passing out unneeded low frequencies isn't a bad thing, not in the least.Therapist wrote:Is there a case that low cutting is an exception to this? There would be no harmonics below the fundamental no?ScooterJack wrote:you need to learn proper subtractive eqing, using a LP/HP is overkill and most likely destroying the harmonics in your samples
I'm not saying to never use a hp/lp on a sound, not at all, but what the original poster is doing is just cutting things that can easily be fixed with proper eqing.
and to address your edit, the harmonics i were referencing to him losing, was when he (the OP) uses a LP indiscriminately
-
deadly_habit
- Posts: 22980
- Joined: Tue Oct 24, 2006 3:41 am
- Location: MURRICA
yea maybve im too spoiled by old analog gear it def is a muit have in digital worldScooterJack wrote:dude... noDeadly Habit wrote:
depends on the noise floor
proper eqing is a MUST HAVE skill for someone interested in becoming any kind of proper engineer. period
unfortunately noise floor is a term of the past now
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests
