LP/HP vs EQing uwanted peaks

hardware, software, tips and tricks
Forum rules
By using this "Production" sub-forum, you acknowledge that you have read, understood and agreed with our terms of use for this site. Click HERE to read them. If you do not agree to our terms of use, you must exit this site immediately. We do not accept any responsibility for the content, submissions, information or links contained herein. Users posting content here, do so completely at their own risk.

Quick Link to Feedback Forum
Locked
cutslade
Posts: 25
Joined: Tue Jan 08, 2008 12:42 am
Location: Switzerland
Contact:

LP/HP vs EQing uwanted peaks

Post by cutslade » Wed Aug 26, 2009 6:10 pm

Let's say you have a nice sound with its main part at about 500Hz-1000Hz but at the 200hz region you have another high peak. Now you don't want the 200Hz peak. What do you do to get rid of it? Do you put a steep HP filter below 500Hz to clean out the 200Hz Peak or do you think its better to use an EQ with like -12dB or more and a small Q on that specific unwantet frequency?
I usually take just a steep HP filter and just low cut evrything i don't want and it's ok, but some people like to just decrease that unwanted peak with an EQ. Does it maybe give a more natural sound if you just EQ the unwanted peak down and let those other frequencies below that peak be as they were? Or do you prefer to just massively HP/LP the unwanted stuff away? (thats what i usually do..)
"It depends..." I know, but please can anyone tell about the general pros and cons of specific EQing vs just heavy filtering? (especially in terms of keeping sound natural!). thx!

deadly_habit
Posts: 22980
Joined: Tue Oct 24, 2006 3:41 am
Location: MURRICA

Post by deadly_habit » Wed Aug 26, 2009 6:51 pm

filter em or eq out and as always depends
depends on if you detract too much from orig sound
loud mixdowns come from each element having its own range in freq band 8)

Lurka
>>>>>>>><<<<<<<<
Posts: 1670
Joined: Thu Feb 08, 2007 4:22 pm
Location: Bristol

Post by Lurka » Wed Aug 26, 2009 7:22 pm

Deadly Habit wrote: loud mixdowns come from each element having its own range in freq band 8)
exactly!!! its like a jigsaw, everything has its own place! i wish more people realised this than limiting everything to shit!

but on ure question i am really anal about rolling off low frequencies (maybe a bit too much!) and it can affect the natural sound of the sample. however i only really do those big cuts on selected frequencies when it is either the frequency is really ringing or if in the analyzer its a bit too spiky!

so my solution to ure problem would be to roll the lower freqs off but do it with a sloped eq so still get some of the lower frequncies!

User avatar
Sharmaji
Posts: 5179
Joined: Sun Jan 22, 2006 5:03 pm
Location: Brooklyn NYC
Contact:

Post by Sharmaji » Wed Aug 26, 2009 8:30 pm

depends on the EQ ;)
twitter.com/sharmabeats
twitter.com/SubSwara
subswara.com
myspace.com/davesharma
Low Motion Records, Soul Motive, TKG, Daly City, Mercury UK

cutslade
Posts: 25
Joined: Tue Jan 08, 2008 12:42 am
Location: Switzerland
Contact:

Post by cutslade » Wed Aug 26, 2009 11:35 pm

nowaysj wrote:Is that your fundamental down there at 200?
Yes, I guess so.


..ok, so I see it's apparently not too bad to use HP and LP filters rather than to use peaking EQs. I was just wondering, seeing those people with their really sophisticated looking EQ settings, while I often am almost straight bandpassing stuff to make it sit right ;). Lets say i have a kick: I low cut for SUB and hi cut for bass/snare.. done. And if the sound itself isnt good I just take another kick or pitch it. I usually take quite some time to find the fitting sounds.. but I think it's better than EQing not fitting sounds too hard.

scooterjack
Posts: 415
Joined: Mon Jan 12, 2009 4:38 am

Post by scooterjack » Thu Aug 27, 2009 1:44 am

you need to learn proper subtractive eqing, using a LP/HP is overkill and most likely destroying the harmonics in your samples

deadly_habit
Posts: 22980
Joined: Tue Oct 24, 2006 3:41 am
Location: MURRICA

Post by deadly_habit » Thu Aug 27, 2009 1:45 am

ScooterJack wrote:you need to learn proper subtractive eqing, using a LP/HP is overkill and most likely destroying the harmonics in your samples
as always depends :wink:

scooterjack
Posts: 415
Joined: Mon Jan 12, 2009 4:38 am

Post by scooterjack » Thu Aug 27, 2009 1:50 am

Deadly Habit wrote:
ScooterJack wrote:you need to learn proper subtractive eqing, using a LP/HP is overkill and most likely destroying the harmonics in your samples
as always depends :wink:
yes it does depend, but always using a hp/lp is wrong, plain and simple

deadly_habit
Posts: 22980
Joined: Tue Oct 24, 2006 3:41 am
Location: MURRICA

Post by deadly_habit » Thu Aug 27, 2009 1:56 am

ScooterJack wrote:
Deadly Habit wrote:
ScooterJack wrote:you need to learn proper subtractive eqing, using a LP/HP is overkill and most likely destroying the harmonics in your samples
as always depends :wink:
yes it does depend, but always using a hp/lp is wrong, plain and simple
def a filter is for more extreme cuts than sub eqing
depends on the noise floor

scooterjack
Posts: 415
Joined: Mon Jan 12, 2009 4:38 am

Post by scooterjack » Thu Aug 27, 2009 2:01 am

Deadly Habit wrote:
depends on the noise floor
dude... no


proper eqing is a MUST HAVE skill for someone interested in becoming any kind of proper engineer. period

User avatar
therapist
Posts: 3074
Joined: Thu Jul 30, 2009 11:38 pm

Post by therapist » Thu Aug 27, 2009 2:01 am

ScooterJack wrote:you need to learn proper subtractive eqing, using a LP/HP is overkill and most likely destroying the harmonics in your samples
You can't mess up harmonics by low cutting can you?

scooterjack
Posts: 415
Joined: Mon Jan 12, 2009 4:38 am

Post by scooterjack » Thu Aug 27, 2009 2:07 am

Therapist wrote:
ScooterJack wrote:you need to learn proper subtractive eqing, using a LP/HP is overkill and most likely destroying the harmonics in your samples
Is there a case that low cutting is an exception to this? There would be no harmonics below the fundamental no?
high passing out unneeded low frequencies isn't a bad thing, not in the least.

I'm not saying to never use a hp/lp on a sound, not at all, but what the original poster is doing is just cutting things that can easily be fixed with proper eqing.


and to address your edit, the harmonics i were referencing to him losing, was when he (the OP) uses a LP indiscriminately

deadly_habit
Posts: 22980
Joined: Tue Oct 24, 2006 3:41 am
Location: MURRICA

Post by deadly_habit » Thu Aug 27, 2009 2:15 am

ScooterJack wrote:
Deadly Habit wrote:
depends on the noise floor
dude... no


proper eqing is a MUST HAVE skill for someone interested in becoming any kind of proper engineer. period
yea maybve im too spoiled by old analog gear it def is a muit have in digital world
unfortunately noise floor is a term of the past now

Locked

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests