thanks for this attempt at an historical context dan / hi-defmos dan wrote:south london is a lot younger than north london - in the sense that it was largely fields/small towns round here 300 years ago, until the gaps were filled in between the centre of london and small conurbations like clapham, croydon, wimbledon etc. anyway historically it's not as big a deal, and the tube map reflects that to an extent (check drumzofthesouth for a cool inverted tube map).
as a result there's a slight sense of 'south london isn't proper london' coming from the north, and as a corollary south london has a bit of a 'screw you, yes we are' attitude. time out did a split north/south front page once, and then tried to break down how the two halves were different - laughable when they had a 'typical sth/nth ldn man and woman' picture spread - like how do people dress differently on different sides of the river??
anyway i'm always up for repping this side of the river. probably stems partly from working at the south london press (you can ask georgina about how this boosted her sth ldn pride as well), and from standing on the terraces at wimbledon (not the tennis, tcha!) and singing "south london, nah nah nah, south london, nah nah nah" at spurs/arsenal fans. also sth ldn grime pride in essentials/south agents/south soldiers, and this incredible, incredible song:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dOibZSIT ... ed&search=
SOUTH SIDE RUN TINGS STIIIIIIIIIIIIIILL lol
and hi-def, i'm curious as your source for the hackney carriage thing. and more over, interested in the essense of the divide. personally i wouldn't have thought it could stem from any one thing, more year on year build up of geographic microcultural differences.
this territorialism is very interesting, thanks for highlighting it seckle. but dan, surely it can't be about what and what isn't proper london. i mean, i can see this as a contributing factor but surely not the souce of this..?
where's peter ackroyd when you need him.





