Propellerheads RECORD: don't call it a DAW, motherf*cker!
Forum rules
By using this "Production" sub-forum, you acknowledge that you have read, understood and agreed with our terms of use for this site. Click HERE to read them. If you do not agree to our terms of use, you must exit this site immediately. We do not accept any responsibility for the content, submissions, information or links contained herein. Users posting content here, do so completely at their own risk.
Quick Link to Feedback Forum
By using this "Production" sub-forum, you acknowledge that you have read, understood and agreed with our terms of use for this site. Click HERE to read them. If you do not agree to our terms of use, you must exit this site immediately. We do not accept any responsibility for the content, submissions, information or links contained herein. Users posting content here, do so completely at their own risk.
Quick Link to Feedback Forum
Re: Propellerheads RECORD: don't call it a DAW, motherf*cker!
Anything is a legitimate music making tool, homies. Even this brick wall 
-
cloak and dagger
- Posts: 1146
- Joined: Fri Jun 02, 2006 12:09 pm
- Location: Sittin' on the curb debatin' how to get it percolatin'
- Contact:
Re: Propellerheads RECORD: don't call it a DAW, motherf*cker!
nowaysj wrote:Anything is a legitimate music making tool, homies. Even this brick wall
Now you're getting it
Re: Propellerheads RECORD: don't call it a DAW, motherf*cker!
I've been getting it 
Re: Propellerheads RECORD: don't call it a DAW, motherf*cker!
I havnt been able to find any DAW I like better than record or any vsts I like better than thor+subtractor so I think I'm fine sticking with this! In my opinion fruityloops and ableton both look more "fisherprice" than record does and they are horrible to use. Cubase is just an epic fail in every way, had to use it for music tech at college and I can't think of a single salvation for it. Never had the oportunity to try logic out but I really can't see how I'd be at any advantage changing to it when I havn't encountered any problems with record whatsoever.
The only downside to using record/reason that I can see is that it's a lot more hassle if you wanna be adding acapellas to your tracks...don't understand the massive amounts of hate that it gets, oh well, if it makes you boys feel big hating on shit then by all means knock yourselves out.
The only downside to using record/reason that I can see is that it's a lot more hassle if you wanna be adding acapellas to your tracks...don't understand the massive amounts of hate that it gets, oh well, if it makes you boys feel big hating on shit then by all means knock yourselves out.
Re: Propellerheads RECORD: don't call it a DAW, motherf*cker!
Why everyone say hate? Where's the hate? I, personally like reason. It just can't do everything I need it to do, like meter levels
jokes!
Cubase has sample accurate editing in the project page going for it. That's about it in my opinion. Everything else is pretty retarded, like actually retarded, like 12 years old.
One thing I hate, I mean actual vitriolic hate, is fruity's fucking life time free upgrades... cause they can't collect upgrade fees, they can't fix some of the fundamental problems with their software. And on top of that totally flawed foundation, they have built the most efficient, powerful, and overall speedy user interface of any daw I've used. I honestly hate that shit.
And as far as how professional things look
Cubase has sample accurate editing in the project page going for it. That's about it in my opinion. Everything else is pretty retarded, like actually retarded, like 12 years old.
One thing I hate, I mean actual vitriolic hate, is fruity's fucking life time free upgrades... cause they can't collect upgrade fees, they can't fix some of the fundamental problems with their software. And on top of that totally flawed foundation, they have built the most efficient, powerful, and overall speedy user interface of any daw I've used. I honestly hate that shit.
And as far as how professional things look
-
deadly_habit
- Posts: 22980
- Joined: Tue Oct 24, 2006 3:41 am
- Location: MURRICA
Re: Propellerheads RECORD: don't call it a DAW, motherf*cker!
if it works it works i could never get into reason besides the synths
sequencing was awkward for me as well as automation, why i use cubase and renoise
betad record and it's close to like a multi audacity so no issues
glad reason heads have audio finally
even in the box there is loads of established roducers using only reason
all a matter of pref
sequencing was awkward for me as well as automation, why i use cubase and renoise
betad record and it's close to like a multi audacity so no issues
glad reason heads have audio finally
even in the box there is loads of established roducers using only reason
all a matter of pref
Re: Propellerheads RECORD: don't call it a DAW, motherf*cker!
u try reason 4? Automation clips are the way to go for automation?
-
deadly_habit
- Posts: 22980
- Joined: Tue Oct 24, 2006 3:41 am
- Location: MURRICA
Re: Propellerheads RECORD: don't call it a DAW, motherf*cker!
heh ive had pms you learn cubase automation yet?nowaysj wrote:u try reason 4? Automation clips are the way to go for automation?
best avail in business
you pissed off alot of people in cubase threads
Re: Propellerheads RECORD: don't call it a DAW, motherf*cker!
Ha ha ha! Automation so good you can't move it, or draw curves with it for that matter. Jokes. Other dev's have figured out and implemented more control, easier to use techniques for automation.
-
deadly_habit
- Posts: 22980
- Joined: Tue Oct 24, 2006 3:41 am
- Location: MURRICA
Re: Propellerheads RECORD: don't call it a DAW, motherf*cker!
cubase noob and only time i will give ya flack bout itnowaysj wrote:Ha ha ha! Automation so good you can't move it, or draw curves with it for that matter. Jokes. Other dev's have figured out and implemented more control, easier to use techniques for automation.
cubase kills fl automation if ya know how to use it
i hope you get power book soon
Re: Propellerheads RECORD: don't call it a DAW, motherf*cker!
am total cubase newb
will get power tools in dec when published.
Still, I don't think that book is going to show me how to draw curves other than either using their predefined little fades, or a whole bunch of little points. And working with a vsti with 16 outs, and trying to move all that automation, f'ing nightmare. The answer to that is not in the powertools, but in germany.
I really prefer to have my automation remain discreet. In fl, the automation clip is separate from the audio or midi clip, so you can move the automation around and size just as easily as you can with events in cubase, you can use one automation clip to control 20 different things in fl. It's just way easier, more flexible, and more powerful.
If you're willing to share how to move automation for 16 tracks of a multi out vst, or how to control 20 different things with one bit of automation, I'm ALL EARS!
Still, I don't think that book is going to show me how to draw curves other than either using their predefined little fades, or a whole bunch of little points. And working with a vsti with 16 outs, and trying to move all that automation, f'ing nightmare. The answer to that is not in the powertools, but in germany.
I really prefer to have my automation remain discreet. In fl, the automation clip is separate from the audio or midi clip, so you can move the automation around and size just as easily as you can with events in cubase, you can use one automation clip to control 20 different things in fl. It's just way easier, more flexible, and more powerful.
If you're willing to share how to move automation for 16 tracks of a multi out vst, or how to control 20 different things with one bit of automation, I'm ALL EARS!
Re: Propellerheads RECORD: don't call it a DAW, motherf*cker!
nowaysj, If you dont know what your slating, then dont say anything. Cubase, as with Logic has exceptional curves and outstanding cross-fade functions ala Protools.
Re: Propellerheads RECORD: don't call it a DAW, motherf*cker!
jackmaster wrote:you went in with this mix.
Soundcloud.onelove. wrote:There needs to be a DZA app on iPhone just for id'ing old Grime tracks.
http://soundcloud.com/keepitgully http://www.mixcloud.com/slevarance/
-
deadly_habit
- Posts: 22980
- Joined: Tue Oct 24, 2006 3:41 am
- Location: MURRICA
Re: Propellerheads RECORD: don't call it a DAW, motherf*cker!
yea last time i used fl the automation was a nightmarenowaysj wrote:am total cubase newbwill get power tools in dec when published.
Still, I don't think that book is going to show me how to draw curves other than either using their predefined little fades, or a whole bunch of little points. And working with a vsti with 16 outs, and trying to move all that automation, f'ing nightmare. The answer to that is not in the powertools, but in germany.
I really prefer to have my automation remain discreet. In fl, the automation clip is separate from the audio or midi clip, so you can move the automation around and size just as easily as you can with events in cubase, you can use one automation clip to control 20 different things in fl. It's just way easier, more flexible, and more powerful.
If you're willing to share how to move automation for 16 tracks of a multi out vst, or how to control 20 different things with one bit of automation, I'm ALL EARS!
get a wacom tablet like a bamboo if you want to have that much control
hell i'm getting sent a nfr copy of fl9 soon which i'll mess with but seriously sounds like you haven't invested enough time into cubase to even scratch the surface on automation lanes
- youthful_implants
- Posts: 537
- Joined: Wed Jul 29, 2009 12:42 am
- Location: wheel up the tune fast like ramadan
Re: Propellerheads RECORD: don't call it a DAW, motherf*cker!
no no I think its a devastatingly powerful piece of software and lots of incredible, jaw droppingly amazing music has been made with it.yellowhighlighter wrote:what you're basically implying is that reason/record is not a legitimate music making tool when compared to cubase or logic. that is rather short sighted.
come to think of it i don't think my mpc or machinedrum support plugins either...
I just find it too fiddly, and disruptive to my workflow but having said that I am lazy and always looking for quicker results so I rewire it into Cubase often, same with Ableton.
-
deadly_habit
- Posts: 22980
- Joined: Tue Oct 24, 2006 3:41 am
- Location: MURRICA
Re: Propellerheads RECORD: don't call it a DAW, motherf*cker!
i love when my ghetto custies ask if yo is that vst plugin compatible with my mpc?
or my fave yo you got that reason son?
then i don't feel so bad when they bust out their wad of cash from dealing drugs ugh
you have a wad of 50s 100s or 20s and want a discount? really?
or my fave yo you got that reason son?
then i don't feel so bad when they bust out their wad of cash from dealing drugs ugh
you have a wad of 50s 100s or 20s and want a discount? really?
-
cloak and dagger
- Posts: 1146
- Joined: Fri Jun 02, 2006 12:09 pm
- Location: Sittin' on the curb debatin' how to get it percolatin'
- Contact:
Re: Propellerheads RECORD: don't call it a DAW, motherf*cker!
deadly habit wrote: but seriously sounds like you haven't invested enough time into cubase to even scratch the surface on automation lanes
He's right though, read the various Cubase threads. Moving and handling automation for a whole track is definitely the worst I've ever used on a professional DAW. I feel like a program that's been improved over the course of a decade shouldn't be getting trumped by programs like Reason or Reaper for basic functions.
Also, they fucked the Mediabay in version 4.5 and over so that it's basically useless, and removed some drag and drop functionality from 4 to 5.
Ok, rant over. I guess my point is that as much as Reason has missing stuff, there are a lot less "this is retarded" moments in relation to the software.
I love Cubase, I just find it much more of a chore to work with structure and arrange things for this very reason.
I never really got why people argue about DAWs so much though, it's like people don't realize that the best electronic music ever made was done on MUCH shittier stuff than ANY of the options we have available to us now.
Last edited by cloak and dagger on Mon Nov 02, 2009 12:43 am, edited 1 time in total.
Re: Propellerheads RECORD: don't call it a DAW, motherf*cker!
I dont hear anythingnowaysj wrote:Anything is a legitimate music making tool, homies. Even this brick wall
Re: Propellerheads RECORD: don't call it a DAW, motherf*cker!
Use a frequency analyzer. U don't need to hear it to mix it.ninjadog wrote:I dont hear anything
Re: Propellerheads RECORD: don't call it a DAW, motherf*cker!
I'd call it a discussion, minus the few personal digscloak and dagger wrote:I never really got why people argue about DAWs so much though
And dep, you can't draw curves in cubase.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests
