Vocal Processing??
Forum rules
By using this "Production" sub-forum, you acknowledge that you have read, understood and agreed with our terms of use for this site. Click HERE to read them. If you do not agree to our terms of use, you must exit this site immediately. We do not accept any responsibility for the content, submissions, information or links contained herein. Users posting content here, do so completely at their own risk.
Quick Link to Feedback Forum
By using this "Production" sub-forum, you acknowledge that you have read, understood and agreed with our terms of use for this site. Click HERE to read them. If you do not agree to our terms of use, you must exit this site immediately. We do not accept any responsibility for the content, submissions, information or links contained herein. Users posting content here, do so completely at their own risk.
Quick Link to Feedback Forum
Vocal Processing??
Hey people, was given a vocal to use for a remix i'm working on at the moment, it's a proper verse chorus male vocal and was wondering if anyone here has some nice tips about processing vocals or some plugins to look out for for some cool effects etc..
would love to pull off the Gnarls Barkley, Burial or Fever Ray type effect, something processed sound but at the same time natural effect, that sort of thing.
cheers..
would love to pull off the Gnarls Barkley, Burial or Fever Ray type effect, something processed sound but at the same time natural effect, that sort of thing.
cheers..
|Beatport | Soundcloud | Facebook | Twitter |
-
deadly_habit
- Posts: 22980
- Joined: Tue Oct 24, 2006 3:41 am
- Location: MURRICA
Re: Vocal Processing??
I've been using the built in autotuner in logic (pitch correction)
just wondering if anyone knows if melodyne, autotune etc are that much better? or am I just being shit with the pitchcorrection plugin
just wondering if anyone knows if melodyne, autotune etc are that much better? or am I just being shit with the pitchcorrection plugin
-
deadly_habit
- Posts: 22980
- Joined: Tue Oct 24, 2006 3:41 am
- Location: MURRICA
Re: Vocal Processing??
melodyne especially now with dna is so worth itlowpass wrote:I've been using the built in autotuner in logic (pitch correction)
just wondering if anyone knows if melodyne, autotune etc are that much better? or am I just being shit with the pitchcorrection plugin
autotune, meh been used and abused too much
Re: Vocal Processing??
Yeah, if you actually want a natural sound, go for Melodyne. It's absolutely amazing in its transparency yet accuracy.
Using reverb properly I think is the toughest thing ever. In school I learned, "get the reverb to the point you like, then dial it back 20%" because most people tend to overuse it. Of course stuff like Burial uses quite a lot more reverb. So I'd say don't be afraid of a lot of reverb as a stylistic choice, just don't blow your load if you want a really clean natural sound. A tip I learned actually from work is to use two or even three reverbs on send channels.. a small, medium and large space. Send small, different amounts to each to get different layers of reflections. The result sounds surprisingly natural.
In electronic music I end up using a lot of compression on vocals so that they still poke out over the heavy bass and all. So you might want to compress more, but use medium attack and release times and a ratio of about 4:1 for transparency.
Using reverb properly I think is the toughest thing ever. In school I learned, "get the reverb to the point you like, then dial it back 20%" because most people tend to overuse it. Of course stuff like Burial uses quite a lot more reverb. So I'd say don't be afraid of a lot of reverb as a stylistic choice, just don't blow your load if you want a really clean natural sound. A tip I learned actually from work is to use two or even three reverbs on send channels.. a small, medium and large space. Send small, different amounts to each to get different layers of reflections. The result sounds surprisingly natural.
In electronic music I end up using a lot of compression on vocals so that they still poke out over the heavy bass and all. So you might want to compress more, but use medium attack and release times and a ratio of about 4:1 for transparency.
http://www.soundcloud.com/ill-esha
http://www.ill-esha.com
http://www.myspace.com/illesha
GLITCHHOPFORUM
INTEGRATED GRIME UNIT
http://www.ill-esha.com
http://www.myspace.com/illesha
GLITCHHOPFORUM
INTEGRATED GRIME UNIT
Android Bishop wrote: modulating the number of voices is going over the line you fucking barbaric heathen!!!
Re: Vocal Processing??
cheers for the feedback..ill-esha wrote:Yeah, if you actually want a natural sound, go for Melodyne. It's absolutely amazing in its transparency yet accuracy.
Using reverb properly I think is the toughest thing ever. In school I learned, "get the reverb to the point you like, then dial it back 20%" because most people tend to overuse it. Of course stuff like Burial uses quite a lot more reverb. So I'd say don't be afraid of a lot of reverb as a stylistic choice, just don't blow your load if you want a really clean natural sound. A tip I learned actually from work is to use two or even three reverbs on send channels.. a small, medium and large space. Send small, different amounts to each to get different layers of reflections. The result sounds surprisingly natural.
In electronic music I end up using a lot of compression on vocals so that they still poke out over the heavy bass and all. So you might want to compress more, but use medium attack and release times and a ratio of about 4:1 for transparency.
i tend to do that with reverbs too. 2 or 3 and send them to various parts of my track. i was thinking about the amount of reverb too, dialling it back as you said seems to help as the other higher frequencies just seem to emphasize it too much.
i've really heavy amounts of compression to control the sibilance of the vocal as the bass is a heavy enough wobble. i might switch the desser compressor to a send and apply some back to the original dry signal maybe..
another thing i was messing with was pitching the vocal down by 5 semitones and layering it back under the original. anyone have much success with this type of thing or does it just muddy up the mix?
|Beatport | Soundcloud | Facebook | Twitter |
- tripaddict
- Posts: 2417
- Joined: Fri Aug 07, 2009 11:53 pm
- Location: Midlands, UK
- Contact:
Re: Vocal Processing??
do not use autotune it'll make 50% of the general population hate your music lol
... tls_maximiser ... very light reverb and nowt else ... n make sure the vocal is sick dont use a weak vocal .... can ruin a good tune esp if you repeat the same sample over n over
... tls_maximiser ... very light reverb and nowt else ... n make sure the vocal is sick dont use a weak vocal .... can ruin a good tune esp if you repeat the same sample over n over
Re: Vocal Processing??
including me... autotune highlights everything that is wrong with the entertainment industry/hollywood today... too much focus on mechanical 'perfection' not enough focus on soul... for dubstep all you really need is some delay, maybe timestretch
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests

