Sub Bass

hardware, software, tips and tricks
Forum rules
By using this "Production" sub-forum, you acknowledge that you have read, understood and agreed with our terms of use for this site. Click HERE to read them. If you do not agree to our terms of use, you must exit this site immediately. We do not accept any responsibility for the content, submissions, information or links contained herein. Users posting content here, do so completely at their own risk.

Quick Link to Feedback Forum
User avatar
halo skycrash
Posts: 29
Joined: Fri Jul 03, 2009 6:45 pm
Location: Los Angeles
Contact:

Re: Sub Bass

Post by halo skycrash » Sat Jan 02, 2010 5:35 am

Just use a frequency analyzer, solo the sub bass and see where is hitting.

pete
Posts: 263
Joined: Thu Mar 16, 2006 9:26 pm
Location: Berlin

Re: Sub Bass

Post by pete » Sat Jan 02, 2010 6:23 pm

deadly habit wrote:harmonics, dynamic range and perceived loudness. get a reading :wink:
:z:
We Bang wrote:you gonna have to help a brotha out a little then that. what does it mean and where should I look. I can look it up on goole of course but I need to understand what your saying and why so when looking for the subject I know why I am reading it
1. distortion / harmonics

slight distortion on the sub will add harmonics, creating a bigger and warmer sound.
because the harmonics are above the root frequency, you will hear it in the car, on the hifi system etc.
distortion and harmonics can be created with overdrive and distortion plugs, tape emulations, or hard compressing with the right setting. there is plenty of other options but i think these are the most common.
experiment witht the settings of your plugins, and train you ear to notice the difference in character.

this has also got to do with psychoacoustics - a complex topic. one good thing to know is the following:
if harmonics are added to a sound, our brain recognises the root frequency. the trick is, that even if the root note is not played back by the soundsystem/speaker, our hearing will still think it is there!

2. dynamic range

dynamic range is the range between the peak level and the rms level (rms = perceived loudness).
in dubstep music, you will find that most sub bass is very compressed, making shure it has a consistent level.
i analyzed some tunes where the dynamic range shrinks to 5db when the bass drops!

3. perceived loudness

RMS level.


search google for those keywords, you will find and read alot :wink:
as far as production goes, try around and learn which plugin is useful for you. then learn about the parameters by ear.

pete
Posts: 263
Joined: Thu Mar 16, 2006 9:26 pm
Location: Berlin

Re: Sub Bass

Post by pete » Sat Jan 02, 2010 6:26 pm

Depone wrote:
apathesis wrote:
Change key to F. F is the best sub :D
Well, without trying to sound like a dick,
it depends on the rooms acoustics innit!?
that's true.

User avatar
WeBang
Posts: 530
Joined: Sat Oct 17, 2009 6:06 pm

Re: Sub Bass

Post by WeBang » Sat Jan 02, 2010 6:40 pm

pete wrote:
deadly habit wrote:harmonics, dynamic range and perceived loudness. get a reading :wink:
:z:
We Bang wrote:you gonna have to help a brotha out a little then that. what does it mean and where should I look. I can look it up on goole of course but I need to understand what your saying and why so when looking for the subject I know why I am reading it
1. distortion / harmonics

slight distortion on the sub will add harmonics, creating a bigger and warmer sound.
because the harmonics are above the root frequency, you will hear it in the car, on the hifi system etc.
distortion and harmonics can be created with overdrive and distortion plugs, tape emulations, or hard compressing with the right setting. there is plenty of other options but i think these are the most common.
experiment witht the settings of your plugins, and train you ear to notice the difference in character.

this has also got to do with psychoacoustics - a complex topic. one good thing to know is the following:
if harmonics are added to a sound, our brain recognises the root frequency. the trick is, that even if the root note is not played back by the soundsystem/speaker, our hearing will still think it is there!

2. dynamic range

dynamic range is the range between the peak level and the rms level (rms = perceived loudness).
in dubstep music, you will find that most sub bass is very compressed, making shure it has a consistent level.
i analyzed some tunes where the dynamic range shrinks to 5db when the bass drops!

3. perceived loudness

RMS level.


search google for those keywords, you will find and read alot :wink:
as far as production goes, try around and learn which plugin is useful for you. then learn about the parameters by ear.


Perfect Pete thanks
Soundcloud
https://www.facebook.com/mustacheriot
PLAYME RECS Smash the floor on beatport.com
Soundcloud
We Bang "I am Me" Free tune
Soundcloud

User avatar
stappard
Posts: 1529
Joined: Mon Feb 09, 2009 1:56 am
Location: se5

Re: Sub Bass

Post by stappard » Sat Jan 02, 2010 7:56 pm

HAACK wrote:Since this is a sub bass thread for the mil' time, I have been experimenting on getting a full sub sound by using minor stereo, with proper compression and limiting I stay on mark no more than +3dB.

What are everyone's suggestions about using stereo effects on a sub bass? For an example have a look at SP:MC "Trust Nobody"

your sub bass is peaking at +3db?

User avatar
kulture
Posts: 501
Joined: Fri Aug 10, 2007 2:11 pm
Location: UK
Contact:

Re: Sub Bass

Post by kulture » Thu Feb 04, 2010 3:17 pm

pete wrote:2. dynamic range

dynamic range is the range between the peak level and the rms level (rms = perceived loudness).
in dubstep music, you will find that most sub bass is very compressed, making shure it has a consistent level.
i analyzed some tunes where the dynamic range shrinks to 5db when the bass drops!

3. perceived loudness

RMS level.
Isn't dynamic range the difference between the lowest rms level (probably the noise of the system) and the highest peak level? And, RMS isn't necessarily the percieved level, unless it takes into account the equal loudness contours (see Fig. 1)?

Image
(Fig. 1 Ideas taken from ISO 266)

:-) I'm sitting in the library writing a paper on mixing with sub-bass-heavy music at the moment. So please correct me if I'm wrong.

jaydot
Posts: 5860
Joined: Sat Dec 05, 2009 10:34 am
Location: Your place or hers?

Re: Sub Bass

Post by jaydot » Thu Feb 04, 2010 8:59 pm

I'm pretty new to sub-bassing, I just use an Ableton standard sub and tune it until it sounds right.
Soundcloud

Soundcloud

tweet @jaydotdubstep

Blue Patterns
Posts: 623
Joined: Sat Nov 21, 2009 8:32 pm

Re: Sub Bass

Post by Blue Patterns » Thu Feb 04, 2010 11:40 pm

I like getting sub outta samples. place a sound in Sampler....play it on the lower end, if it works ...:m:

User avatar
Depone
Posts: 3526
Joined: Fri Sep 18, 2009 3:49 pm
Location: South-West UK
Contact:

Re: Sub Bass

Post by Depone » Fri Feb 05, 2010 12:06 am

Blue Patterns wrote:I like getting sub outta samples. place a sound in Sampler....play it on the lower end, if it works ...:m:
Yes!

The best sub bass i own is from the tail of an analogue tape recording of an 808 Kick. Looped one cycle and then tuned it to be in key. Sounds Phatter than a pure sine as it has subtle overtones.

User avatar
jsills
Posts: 1284
Joined: Wed Jun 17, 2009 12:40 am
Location: Brooklyn
Contact:

Re: Sub Bass

Post by jsills » Fri Feb 05, 2010 1:42 am

Depone wrote:
Blue Patterns wrote:I like getting sub outta samples. place a sound in Sampler....play it on the lower end, if it works ...:m:
Yes!

The best sub bass i own is from the tail of an analogue tape recording of an 808 Kick. Looped one cycle and then tuned it to be in key. Sounds Phatter than a pure sine as it has subtle overtones.
808 kik ftw. sometimes i have to keep my self from using an 808 because ive used it in the last 10 tracks ive made and will probably use it in the next 10.

pete
Posts: 263
Joined: Thu Mar 16, 2006 9:26 pm
Location: Berlin

Re: Sub Bass

Post by pete » Fri Feb 05, 2010 1:47 am

in general, RMS is a mathematical function http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Root_mean_square
the RMS level comes very close to the human perception of loudness, as RMS does not only consider peaks, but more the average level of sound.

pete
Posts: 263
Joined: Thu Mar 16, 2006 9:26 pm
Location: Berlin

Re: Sub Bass

Post by pete » Fri Feb 05, 2010 1:47 am

kulture wrote:Isn't dynamic range the difference between the lowest rms level (probably the noise of the system) and the highest peak level?
not exactly sure what you mean by lowest RMS level...

there can only be one RMS value at a time, so theoratically if you use a sample rate of 44,1 khz, that would be 44,100 different values that can be measured per second.
for a better understanding of how RMS measurement works in praxis, let's take a look at the TT Dynamic Range Meter http://dynamicrange.de/

here is an axcerpt from the manual, which explains how the measurement works:
In order to determine the official DR value, a song or entire
album (16 bit, 44.1 kHz wave format) is scanned. A histogram
(loudness distribution diagram) is created with a resolution of
0.01 dB. The RMS – an established loudness measurement
standard – is determined by gathering approximately 10,000
pieces of loudness information within a time span of 3 seconds
(dB/RMS).
From this result, only the loudest 20% is used for
determining the average loudness of the loud passages.
At the same time, the loudest peak is determined.
The DR Value is the difference between the peak and the top 20
average RMS measurements (top 20 RMS minus Peak = DR).
The top 20 RMS value is not displayed separately. It can be
easily calculated in the head by adding the displayed stereo
(plus decimal place) DYNAMIC RANGE value with the peak
headroom.

pete
Posts: 263
Joined: Thu Mar 16, 2006 9:26 pm
Location: Berlin

Re: Sub Bass

Post by pete » Fri Feb 05, 2010 1:58 am

kulture wrote:And, RMS isn't necessarily the percieved level, unless it takes into account the equal loudness contours (see Fig. 1)?

Image
(Fig. 1 Ideas taken from ISO 266)
that's an interesting question, of course the equal loudness contours will alter the perception of the sound, but that has nothing to do with RMS or how it is measured (see above).

measured RMS is not connected with how the sound is perceived and changed through physical and psychoacoustic phenomena, including dbSPL, frequency cancellations in the room, sound system characteristics etc.
RMS information will be strictly delivered from the source data and not be affected by any external processes.
kulture wrote::-) I'm sitting in the library writing a paper on mixing with sub-bass-heavy music at the moment. So please correct me if I'm wrong.
good stuff, let me know if you got more questions. think this is an interesting topic right here :)

User avatar
phrex
Posts: 7169
Joined: Sun May 31, 2009 6:02 pm
Location: bern
Contact:

Re: Sub Bass

Post by phrex » Fri Feb 05, 2010 12:50 pm

now. i have 2 subs here.
what you think, which one's better. i'll tell you afterwoods what the actual difference is.

Soundcloud
Soundcloud
Legend4ry wrote:Well I am still living in that haze that dubstep is about a dark room with a big system, peoples with their heads down and trigger fingers in the air.
forthcoming 12", spring/summer 2015:
goldplate / war continues

serox
Posts: 4899
Joined: Fri Jan 18, 2008 9:17 am
Location: South London

Re: Sub Bass

Post by serox » Fri Feb 05, 2010 12:54 pm

vulvavibration wrote:now. i have 2 subs here.
what you think, which one's better. i'll tell you afterwoods what the actual difference is.

Soundcloud
Soundcloud
nothing there.
Don’t worry about people stealing an idea. If it’s original, you will have to ram it down their throats.

User avatar
phrex
Posts: 7169
Joined: Sun May 31, 2009 6:02 pm
Location: bern
Contact:

Re: Sub Bass

Post by phrex » Fri Feb 05, 2010 1:20 pm

damn it... fkcing soundcloud.

http://soundcloud.com/subquarian/tracks

sub1 and sub2.

you should download them to get optimal quality, cause i think to hear the difference it needs the full quality
Legend4ry wrote:Well I am still living in that haze that dubstep is about a dark room with a big system, peoples with their heads down and trigger fingers in the air.
forthcoming 12", spring/summer 2015:
goldplate / war continues

User avatar
kulture
Posts: 501
Joined: Fri Aug 10, 2007 2:11 pm
Location: UK
Contact:

Re: Sub Bass

Post by kulture » Fri Feb 05, 2010 1:27 pm

pete wrote:that's an interesting question, of course the equal loudness contours will alter the perception of the sound, but that has nothing to do with RMS or how it is measured (see above).

measured RMS is not connected with how the sound is perceived and changed through physical and psychoacoustic phenomena, including dbSPL, frequency cancellations in the room, sound system characteristics etc.
RMS information will be strictly delivered from the source data and not be affected by any external processes.

- Sorry to be pedantic but you said that RMS is the perceived loudness in a previous post. Loudness is affected by the equal loudness contours (a psychoacoustic phenomenon) and many other elements/phenomena. Therefore, RMS is literally what it says it is, root mean square, merely a statistical tool for finding a kind of average of sinusoidal magnitudes -- different from perceived loudness.

EDIT: oh, and with respect to dynamic range, I may be thinking of something different. Because the dynamic range can be defined simply as the lowest signal to the highest signal (the range of levels). Without dither, the lowest signal will be the quantisation error. With dither it will be the dither (noise). Perhaps in mastering or some other process there is a dynamic range term which uses the upper RMS of an entire track?

serox
Posts: 4899
Joined: Fri Jan 18, 2008 9:17 am
Location: South London

Re: Sub Bass

Post by serox » Fri Feb 05, 2010 1:54 pm

vulvavibration wrote:damn it... fkcing soundcloud.

http://soundcloud.com/subquarian/tracks

sub1 and sub2.

you should download them to get optimal quality, cause i think to hear the difference it needs the full quality
they are both the same.

A sub takes less than 10 seconds to make. what is all this science shit about>?
Don’t worry about people stealing an idea. If it’s original, you will have to ram it down their throats.

User avatar
phrex
Posts: 7169
Joined: Sun May 31, 2009 6:02 pm
Location: bern
Contact:

Re: Sub Bass

Post by phrex » Fri Feb 05, 2010 2:26 pm

fuck this...

just listened to it. yeah. sounds same
on ableton it does not sound same.

the freq. analyzer tells me too that it's a difference.
Legend4ry wrote:Well I am still living in that haze that dubstep is about a dark room with a big system, peoples with their heads down and trigger fingers in the air.
forthcoming 12", spring/summer 2015:
goldplate / war continues

serox
Posts: 4899
Joined: Fri Jan 18, 2008 9:17 am
Location: South London

Re: Sub Bass

Post by serox » Fri Feb 05, 2010 2:31 pm

vulvavibration wrote:fuck this...

just listened to it. yeah. sounds same
on ableton it does not sound same.

the freq. analyzer tells me too that it's a difference.
Use ur ears instead then?

Serious, what are you lot on about?! a sub is a sub! all you need to do is choose which note you want it on lol.

You are getting lost in the science! you are trying to create the best sub ever going or something? fuck it! make a good tune and stick a sine under it. Stop wasting time on rubbish and get creative!
Don’t worry about people stealing an idea. If it’s original, you will have to ram it down their throats.

Locked

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests