Mephedrone is gong to ruin Dubstep

[.onelove.]

I'd rather see people with fat smiles on their faces enjoying 'emselves then drunk aggressive pricks.

[pure]

[pure]

i think this couldve turned into a huge thread if you hadnt fucked up the title, oh well

i dare say the subtlety of the thread starters humour has left you out in the cold

[cumbriandubsteper]

I'd rather see people with fat smiles on their faces enjoying 'emselves then drunk aggressive pricks.

I totally agree.

[LA_Boxers]

Heroin will ruin housing estates.
Weed will ruin weddings.
Crack will ruin carnivals.
Crystal meth will ruin...something.

blah blah blah.

If you can handle your drugs then all well and good.........if you cant, get the fuck out!

[pure]

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7dQf16E-cB0

[jiggamanjoe]

oh gosh im loving that tune just out of principle

[dirty d]

Really though, I doubt it. I mean at most good nights, theres barely any mephedrone. Its normally at those wubwubchhhwaawubwuba nights. You know Funtcase and shit. I thought most good nights everyone was just kinda high, drunk or maybe sober.

nah man ur well wrong i went out at weekend and everyone was on it.. wasnt ne other drugs available.. this shit is everywhere

will ruin more than jus dubstep!!!

[deamonds]

Really though, I doubt it. I mean at most good nights, theres barely any mephedrone. Its normally at those wubwubchhhwaawubwuba nights. You know Funtcase and shit. I thought most good nights everyone was just kinda high, drunk or maybe sober.

not true. dmz was full of mephedrone last time.

lol, who said DMZ was still a good night? I swear there was beef at the last one?

[bunge]

if DMZ isnt a good night, what is?

[hackman]

if DMZ isnt a good night, what is?

fuck loads of nights lol

[test_recordings]

The ban on mkat's been put back due to the person in charge of co-ordinating the scientific backing resigning as there's not a good reason to review the legal status i.e. it's not worth it. Government policy isn't based on scientific evidence, a really great scientist called David Nutt got fired for telling the truth about what drugs do ffs! He started his own independent research body called the "Independent Scientific Committee on Drugs (ISCD)" which uses reviews of data to formulate what the drugs actually do and how they affect people as opposed to the government-backed "Advisory Council on the Misuse of Drugs (ACMD)" which is based on opinion and politics (but doesn't necessarily not have it's own say, it's just hard to bite the hand that feeds it).
On another note, the American classification of cocaine as a banned (scedule 1 - 'class A') substance is because it was incorrectly classifed as a narcotic like heroin and other opiates which it isn't - it's a separate substance. There's also spelling errors in there that have never been corrected and are used as the basis of legal work, dumb or what?
Fair enough some drugs are really bad but the whole way of going about it is really wrong and misdirected! Thing's need to change.

[twentyOneDummies]

Damn, is the E-shortage THAT BAD out in the UK these days? Or are the kids just bored?

[hackman]

the kids are just stupid

[jiggamanjoe]

The ban on mkat's been put back due to the person in charge of co-ordinating the scientific backing resigning as there's not a good reason to review the legal status i.e. it's not worth it. Government policy isn't based on scientific evidence, a really great scientist called David Nutt got fired for telling the truth about what drugs do ffs! He started his own independent research body called the "Independent Scientific Committee on Drugs (ISCD)" which uses reviews of data to formulate what the drugs actually do and how they affect people as opposed to the government-backed "Advisory Council on the Misuse of Drugs (ACMD)" which is based on opinion and politics (but doesn't necessarily not have it's own say, it's just hard to bite the hand that feeds it).
On another note, the American classification of cocaine as a banned (scedule 1 - 'class A') substance is because it was incorrectly classifed as a narcotic like heroin and other opiates which it isn't - it's a separate substance. There's also spelling errors in there that have never been corrected and are used as the basis of legal work, dumb or what?
Fair enough some drugs are really bad but the whole way of going about it is really wrong and misdirected! Thing's need to change.

too many people wont accept that drugs have always and will always be a part of our society. people don't seem to understand that if the government regulated drugs themselves then it would remove the criminal element and would also be a lot safer.

not sure how many people would be willing to accept that though.

[symmetricalsounds]

The ban on mkat's been put back due to the person in charge of co-ordinating the scientific backing resigning as there's not a good reason to review the legal status i.e. it's not worth it. Government policy isn't based on scientific evidence, a really great scientist called David Nutt got fired for telling the truth about what drugs do ffs! He started his own independent research body called the "Independent Scientific Committee on Drugs (ISCD)" which uses reviews of data to formulate what the drugs actually do and how they affect people as opposed to the government-backed "Advisory Council on the Misuse of Drugs (ACMD)" which is based on opinion and politics (but doesn't necessarily not have it's own say, it's just hard to bite the hand that feeds it).
On another note, the American classification of cocaine as a banned (scedule 1 - 'class A') substance is because it was incorrectly classifed as a narcotic like heroin and other opiates which it isn't - it's a separate substance. There's also spelling errors in there that have never been corrected and are used as the basis of legal work, dumb or what?
Fair enough some drugs are really bad but the whole way of going about it is really wrong and misdirected! Thing's need to change.

too many people wont accept that drugs have always and will always be a part of our society. people don't seem to understand that if the government regulated drugs themselves then it would remove the criminal element and would also be a lot safer.

not sure how many people would be willing to accept that though.

exactly, drugs have been legal for much longer than they've been illegal. everything should be legal, need to be able to go the pharmacist to get some cocaine for my toothache and then go down the local opium den.

[test_recordings]

I read a really good article in the 'Culture' journal (can't remember where exactly, I'm going to have to dig that up) about how society at once suppresses drug use yet glamourises drug-affiliated concepts like addiction and habitual use through application in marketing and advertising. Using the story of 'Train Spotting' by Irvine Welsh as an example it details how drug use is suppressed in capitalist societies because it basically denies unnecessary consumption of goods to take place as the user is uninterested in the pointless and banal offerings of 'the market' perpetuated by the illusion of choice; why should we not let people take heroin and yet force people to work in an unfair system as slaves? I think that was basically the point of the article.
It might be of interest to you that one of the most famous 'behaviourist' (where behaviour can be 'conditioned'- read about Pavlov and his dogs here http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Classical_conditioning) psychologists John Watson gave up the philanthropic nature of his work and went in to marketing in the 1920s to convince people to buy unnecessary goods to increase growth in the American economy - it was slowing at that time as people's basic needs had been well met and there was nothing that was feasibly needed left to invest in.
Music has also been about in human culture for at least 50,000 years, longer than agriculture (evidence from carbon dating a bone flute found in eastern Europe, made out of a now-extinct bear femur notheless) and so have drugs. It has been argued that psychedelic drug aided our evolution by enhancing mental capacity or questioning our perception of our environment (plus more, I'm sure). When magic mushrooms were 'legal' in the UK (i.e. free to possess unprepared) they were easily available from a range of knowledgeable outlets and used by a small, responsible proportion of the population as a recreational activity and philosophical aid; now-banned psylocybin-carrying varieties are well-documented as non-toxic with a minimal risk of short- or long-term damage with the exception being individuals disposed to latent mental problems who may have their symptoms excaberated. Alcohol on the other hand is highly dangerous with acute high-level doses (death by effects of overdose can be a singular cause of death) and chronic abuse (liver failure, to name but one problem) as well as being highly addictive almost as much as coke and heroin with far worse withdrawal symptoms than heroin (including death, heroin has relatively minor effects by comparison only lasting up to around 72 hours and no risk of injury or death it's just pretty uncomfortable) yet is available 24-hours a day with government backing; they were wont to repeal the licensing laws as they were relying on the income. AND PUTTING A MINMUM PRICE ON ALCOHOL WON'T STOP ABUSE, the abusers will do what they do anyway and normal people have to fork out for an unnecessary tax.

Mephedrone's shit anyway

[honey-d]

There's like zero mephedrone at LA nights, plenty of cheeba, beer, and ketamine though.

[spydee]

Government policy isn't based on scientific evidence.

[LA_Boxers]

Damn, is the E-shortage THAT BAD out in the UK these days? Or are the kids just bored?

Pills are crap. Stick clear of them.