Headphones recommendation
Forum rules
By using this "Production" sub-forum, you acknowledge that you have read, understood and agreed with our terms of use for this site. Click HERE to read them. If you do not agree to our terms of use, you must exit this site immediately. We do not accept any responsibility for the content, submissions, information or links contained herein. Users posting content here, do so completely at their own risk.
Quick Link to Feedback Forum
By using this "Production" sub-forum, you acknowledge that you have read, understood and agreed with our terms of use for this site. Click HERE to read them. If you do not agree to our terms of use, you must exit this site immediately. We do not accept any responsibility for the content, submissions, information or links contained herein. Users posting content here, do so completely at their own risk.
Quick Link to Feedback Forum
Headphones recommendation
Okay i'm after some headphones and i've done a little research and heard numerous recommendations. The Sony Xb series look sick for bass, but you'd look like a spanner walking round with them on. Look like giant donuts strapped to your head. But yeah i've been looking at the Sony MDR-V700's in the Dj range not sure whether these are any good, especially with the focus being on bass and low frequencies. And with sony, i may only be paying for the brand name. Also heard the Sennheiser HD range are pretty good. Any recommendations? Thanks 
Re: Headphones recommendation
Sennheiser HD 25-1 II

jackmaster wrote:you went in with this mix.
Soundcloud.onelove. wrote:There needs to be a DZA app on iPhone just for id'ing old Grime tracks.
http://soundcloud.com/keepitgully http://www.mixcloud.com/slevarance/
Re: Headphones recommendation
Yeah nice one, been looking at the 25'sDZA wrote:Sennheiser HD 25-1 II
Re: Headphones recommendation
Senn HD600s
Statement of Intent VIP / Sahaquiel v4 single out now on UK Trends.
Soundcloud
Soundcloud | Bandcamp | Mixcloud | Twitter
Soundcloud
Soundcloud | Bandcamp | Mixcloud | Twitter
Re: Headphones recommendation
everyone get over to the DSF channel on Ustream. Phrex is on the decks!!
Re: Headphones recommendation
Bump for the sake of proper sound.
So kinda have the same question as Weedkeepa, headphones with proper bass (no over-kill)?
I know Ultrasone, Grado and such are pretty good but I ain't spending 140 quid on a pair of headphones.
O and it's for listening to dubstep and dnb not for any production work.
So kinda have the same question as Weedkeepa, headphones with proper bass (no over-kill)?
I know Ultrasone, Grado and such are pretty good but I ain't spending 140 quid on a pair of headphones.
O and it's for listening to dubstep and dnb not for any production work.
Agent 47 wrote:Next time I can think of something, I will.
Re: Headphones recommendation
hahaha just seen this. you're ace jfkJFK wrote:everyone get over to the DSF channel on Ustream. Phrex is on the decks!!
forthcoming 12", spring/summer 2015:Legend4ry wrote:Well I am still living in that haze that dubstep is about a dark room with a big system, peoples with their heads down and trigger fingers in the air.
goldplate / war continues
Re: Headphones recommendation
shortinos wrote:ATH-M50
-
deadly_habit
- Posts: 22980
- Joined: Tue Oct 24, 2006 3:41 am
- Location: MURRICA
Re: Headphones recommendation
Word word word word.shortinos wrote:ATH-M50
They sound better than my B&W speakers, no exaggeration.
The cheaper ATH-m30 and ATH-m40 both excellent too at about £30 and £50 respectively, so you could save yourself some cash and pick up either of these, which are better sounding than the HD25s or you can pick up the ATH-M50s for about £100, and blow your mind!
The obvious advantage of the Senheisers is they are smaller and lighter, I recently acquired some Senheiser HD25s for taking out and about, but I've permenently lent them to my girlfriend, to me personally they don't sound amazing, they're not bad but I'd rather take out the M50s even though they're hench!
http://www.dubstepforum.com/post1568922 ... a#p1568922
rbnc wrote: If you're producing, get some monitor headphones like Audio Technica M series. They do plenty of cheaper options like the ATH-M40s which used to cost £130 back in the day but you can get them for about £50 now. You will love them.
They have a frequency response of 5hz - 28,000 Hz (realistically probably about 30Hz) . Plenty of bass, anything below 90Hz is subbass (that number varies on who you ask mind). They will be 100x bassier, fuller and than the Skull Candy poo!
I used to own the ATH-M20s until I sat on them and broke them with my massive arse. Now I have the ATM-M50s. Both great value.
Review
http://www.soundonsound.com/sos/1996_ar ... thm40.html
Enjoy
Audio Technica have produced a very accurate-sounding, enclosed headphone capable of more than enough sound level for serious monitoring or mixing work. Because these phones are enclosed, not only do you get a very solid bass end, you also get very little sound leakage -- an important consideration when recording or overdubbing vocals or acoustic instruments. In the project studio, the ATH-M40s should meet all headphone needs both sides of the glass; my only remaining reservation is the lack of a plug-in lead. Even then, I guess it would be easy enough to fit a small in-line stereo plug and socket into the lead, close to the headphones, if you felt very strongly about it. In a nutshell, though, these are some of the better-sounding enclosed phones on the market.
Re: Headphones recommendation
Best headphones IMO.DZA wrote:Sennheiser HD 25-1 II
Re: Headphones recommendation
Thanks for the replies guys, torn between the 25's ant the M50's now
Re: Headphones recommendation
Either way you'll be happy, the HD25s aren't terrible, and if you never hear the M50s, you'll be happy with the HD25s.
http://www.guitarampkeyboard.com/en/73819
http://www.guitarampkeyboard.com/en/75004
http://www.guitarampkeyboard.com/en/73819
http://www.guitarampkeyboard.com/en/75004
Re: Headphones recommendation
Thanks man, i'm looking tempted by the m50'srbnc wrote:Either way you'll be happy, the HD25s aren't terrible, and if you never hear the M50s, you'll be happy with the HD25s.
http://www.guitarampkeyboard.com/en/73819
http://www.guitarampkeyboard.com/en/75004
In comparing both the M50's and the MDR-700's the stats are as follows:
MDR-V700
Driver Diameter: 50 mm
Frequency Response: 5 - 30,000 Hz
Sensitivity: 107 dB
Impedance: 24 ohms
ATH-M50
Driver Diameter: 45 mm
Frequency Response: 15 - 28,000 Hz
Sensitivity: 99 dB
Impedance: 38 ohms
In comparison the M50's have a larger impedance value where as the V700's sensitivity, FR, driver diameter are greater. What does this mean?
Re: Headphones recommendation
To be honest, you can't actually tell how good headphones or speakers are by the stats, for example, Skull Candy, who make the worst headphones of all time, claim their headphones have a dynamic range of 5hz to 50k or something silly, but they sound utterly terrible.
But for the record:
Frequency response is the theoretical range of the headphones, 5Hz is really low, anything below 90hz is sub bass, anything below 20hz you can't hear but you can feel.
Driver Diameter is the physical size of the speaker driver.
Sensitivity, lower is better, but not too low or else they'll be too quiet, more sensitivity allows more dynamic range and better sound quality. That's why you'll find in the cheaper ATH M-30s have a slightly higher dB.
Impedance is something that is more relevant to big speakers, I wouldn't worry about it too much.
If you're truly undecided Your best bet is to try and listen to both pairs in the shop and see which you like most failing that, read reviews from good sources, not from consumers and not gadget mags, try proper audiophile journals like sound on sound.
But for the record:
Frequency response is the theoretical range of the headphones, 5Hz is really low, anything below 90hz is sub bass, anything below 20hz you can't hear but you can feel.
Driver Diameter is the physical size of the speaker driver.
Sensitivity, lower is better, but not too low or else they'll be too quiet, more sensitivity allows more dynamic range and better sound quality. That's why you'll find in the cheaper ATH M-30s have a slightly higher dB.
Impedance is something that is more relevant to big speakers, I wouldn't worry about it too much.
If you're truly undecided Your best bet is to try and listen to both pairs in the shop and see which you like most failing that, read reviews from good sources, not from consumers and not gadget mags, try proper audiophile journals like sound on sound.
-
little square dot
- Posts: 8
- Joined: Thu Sep 17, 2009 8:36 am
- Location: Toronto
Re: Headphones recommendation
Sennheiser HD 25-1 II
There is no other headphone. (in a reasonable price range)
Trust me, I've been through them all and nothing comes close. Etymotic Research in-ear buds are good too, but cancel sound quite effectively, so good luck djing with them. Go Sennheiser.
There is no other headphone. (in a reasonable price range)
Trust me, I've been through them all and nothing comes close. Etymotic Research in-ear buds are good too, but cancel sound quite effectively, so good luck djing with them. Go Sennheiser.
Re: Headphones recommendation
So you think you think they're better than the B&W P5s? :|little square dot wrote:Sennheiser HD 25-1 II
There is no other headphone. (in a reasonable price range)
Re: Headphones recommendation
To the OP...
If you are considering Sony Headphones, I would go for the MDR-V6's. I know lots of people here prefer the Sennheisers, but personally I use the V6's.
If you are considering Sony Headphones, I would go for the MDR-V6's. I know lots of people here prefer the Sennheisers, but personally I use the V6's.

Tasty Cyanide Radio : Every 3rd Monday, 10pm-12am GMT
Booking: val [at] artik-unit.com
http://artik-unit.com/artists/mad-ep/
Licensing/Publishing: edzy [at] funklabs.com
http://www.funklabs.com/artists/mad-ep
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests


