question about torq vs. serato

hardware, software, tips and tricks
Forum rules
By using this "Production" sub-forum, you acknowledge that you have read, understood and agreed with our terms of use for this site. Click HERE to read them. If you do not agree to our terms of use, you must exit this site immediately. We do not accept any responsibility for the content, submissions, information or links contained herein. Users posting content here, do so completely at their own risk.

Quick Link to Feedback Forum
Locked
PLAZMA
Posts: 3
Joined: Thu May 27, 2010 11:48 pm

question about torq vs. serato

Post by PLAZMA » Fri May 28, 2010 12:07 am

hey there,
so im a n00b and have only been mixing for a few months but have it all on lock now and am looking at investing in either
serato or torq, because it would just be so much more convinient than searching through cds in a dark room.

for cd decks i have stanton C.324s, and theyre pretty sweet
i use the effects on the decks to blend some smoother mixes, and make wobbles on just about any track which i love!
but ive heard that with serato, these will be unusable for some reason.
ive heard alot of good things about torq and its also a bit cheaper,
and i was wondering if there is the same problem with torq.
so will tork let me use these effects built onjto my cd decks? or will it bitch out like serato?

thank you so much!
sorry i looked all over the web and couldnt find a comparison on this

User avatar
nowaysj
Posts: 23281
Joined: Fri Sep 18, 2009 4:11 am
Location: Mountain Fortress

Re: question about torq vs. serato

Post by nowaysj » Fri May 28, 2010 5:22 am

kind of a rash of dj'ing related threads right now. -q-
Join Me
DiegoSapiens wrote:oh fucking hell now i see how on point was nowaysj
Soundcloud

User avatar
Ganglion-Blackguard
Posts: 18
Joined: Fri May 21, 2010 10:03 pm

Re: question about torq vs. serato

Post by Ganglion-Blackguard » Fri May 28, 2010 9:09 pm

Torq and Serato only use your CDJs as timecodes. IE, no audio will be coming from the CD decks at all. Therefore your audio effects on your CDJs will never work with a laptop based MP3 DJ setup.

Torq comes with its own set of effects, which you will need a MIDI controller to operate, unless you want to click on them with your mouse on-screen.

Serato doesn't have any built in effects, but you can buy hardware effects (like a chaos pad, etc).

You're going from an Analog to a Digital DJ system. It's apples and oranges really.

User avatar
abZ
Posts: 5261
Joined: Sat Jan 14, 2006 6:14 pm
Location: pittsburgh
Contact:

Re: question about torq vs. serato

Post by abZ » Sat May 29, 2010 2:35 am

I was thinking as I was reading about how silly it is to have effects on the decks themselves but I remember my first cd player had em, still pretty silly imo. Yeah you can't use those with any of the vinyl control systems. Torq has built in effects amd it gives you the ability to use vst effect as well. You can get any type effect you want with that instead. You would probably want some type of midi controller tho. Not sure what the deal is with Serato's effects but I would imagine by now it has that capability too, I am sure someone else will chime in with that info.

User avatar
gwa
Posts: 14561
Joined: Fri Apr 11, 2008 10:08 am
Location: LOW PASSING YER EAR DRUMZ.

Re: question about torq vs. serato

Post by gwa » Sat May 29, 2010 8:12 am

if you want decent efx you should buy traktor because their efx are 10000000 times better and more advanced than any other competitor
Soundcloud

AUGUST 2012 MIX / DEEP / TECH / HOUSE
Follow me on Twitter
@malcolmzulu

These users Little Downed! this user:
Everyone

User avatar
nowaysj
Posts: 23281
Joined: Fri Sep 18, 2009 4:11 am
Location: Mountain Fortress

Re: question about torq vs. serato

Post by nowaysj » Sat May 29, 2010 8:29 am

If torq gives you vst effects... you can't say that traktor's are the best. :lol:
Join Me
DiegoSapiens wrote:oh fucking hell now i see how on point was nowaysj
Soundcloud

User avatar
abZ
Posts: 5261
Joined: Sat Jan 14, 2006 6:14 pm
Location: pittsburgh
Contact:

Re: question about torq vs. serato

Post by abZ » Sat May 29, 2010 2:44 pm

nowaysj wrote:If torq gives you vst effects... you can't say that traktor's are the best. :lol:
:wink:

User avatar
shredexx
Posts: 698
Joined: Sat Dec 01, 2007 4:45 pm
Location: Berlin

Re: question about torq vs. serato

Post by shredexx » Sat May 29, 2010 7:00 pm

Ganglion-Blackguard wrote: Serato doesn't have any built in effects, but you can buy hardware effects (like a chaos pad, etc).
Absolutely not true... the new version of serato (which is free) has soooo many effects that work very well and sound stupidly good. It might be a good idea to get a basic knob-based midi-controller to use them expressively though...


http://serato.com/downloads/scratchlive

User avatar
Ganglion-Blackguard
Posts: 18
Joined: Fri May 21, 2010 10:03 pm

Re: question about torq vs. serato

Post by Ganglion-Blackguard » Mon May 31, 2010 8:37 pm

shredexx wrote:
Ganglion-Blackguard wrote: Serato doesn't have any built in effects, but you can buy hardware effects (like a chaos pad, etc).
Absolutely not true... the new version of serato (which is free) has soooo many effects that work very well and sound stupidly good. It might be a good idea to get a basic knob-based midi-controller to use them expressively though...


http://serato.com/downloads/scratchlive
Haven't used it or looked into it in a long time. I stand corrected.

Locked

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests