James Blake has done it again

hardware, software, tips and tricks
Forum rules
By using this "Production" sub-forum, you acknowledge that you have read, understood and agreed with our terms of use for this site. Click HERE to read them. If you do not agree to our terms of use, you must exit this site immediately. We do not accept any responsibility for the content, submissions, information or links contained herein. Users posting content here, do so completely at their own risk.

Quick Link to Feedback Forum
User avatar
tripwire22
Posts: 2384
Joined: Wed Mar 25, 2009 11:30 pm
Location: United States
Contact:

Re: James Blake has done it again

Post by tripwire22 » Fri Jun 11, 2010 11:01 pm

James Blake is awfully original if u ask me

deadly_habit
Posts: 22980
Joined: Tue Oct 24, 2006 3:41 am
Location: MURRICA

Re: James Blake has done it again

Post by deadly_habit » Fri Jun 11, 2010 11:30 pm

who knows maybe it's cause i recognize the techniques and how he gets his samples. i def dig his shit a lot, just kinda feels like i've heard it before, prolly cause it's a blend of so many dif genres.

ketamine
Posts: 4367
Joined: Wed Dec 17, 2008 8:52 pm

Re: James Blake has done it again

Post by ketamine » Fri Jun 11, 2010 11:43 pm

To me James Blake sounds like Jazz (and I hate Jazz, but somehow love JB). It sounds like a classically trained musician who "decided to do it digitally" instead of picking up instruments, and use pitch-shifted vox instead of hiring a woman to sit on his piano and sing...

That's probably why it sounds like so many things, because his approach is purely classical, but the sound is modern.

Image

deadly_habit
Posts: 22980
Joined: Tue Oct 24, 2006 3:41 am
Location: MURRICA

Re: James Blake has done it again

Post by deadly_habit » Fri Jun 11, 2010 11:48 pm

ketamine wrote:To me James Blake sounds like Jazz (and I hate Jazz, but somehow love JB). It sounds like a classically trained musician who "decided to do it digitally" instead of picking up instruments, and use pitch-shifted vox instead of hiring a woman to sit on his piano and sing...

That's probably why it sounds like so many things, because his approach is purely classical, but the sound is modern.

Image
yea with how many times i've listened to cmyk i def recognize the vox technique used on it and thanks to i forget who i figured out some of the methods beyond pitch shifting using some free plugins that were recommended. the other tracks you can tell is from old rnb, soul, and funk vinyl sampling plus some great use of compression and basic synth sounds and chords. it's def great stuff with just simple sub sine lines

User avatar
nowaysj
Posts: 23281
Joined: Fri Sep 18, 2009 4:11 am
Location: Mountain Fortress

Re: James Blake has done it again

Post by nowaysj » Fri Jun 11, 2010 11:55 pm

ketamine wrote:and I hate Jazz
:o
Join Me
DiegoSapiens wrote:oh fucking hell now i see how on point was nowaysj
Soundcloud

User avatar
stappard
Posts: 1529
Joined: Mon Feb 09, 2009 1:56 am
Location: se5

Re: James Blake has done it again

Post by stappard » Sat Jun 12, 2010 12:01 am

deadly habit wrote: thanks to i forget who i figured out some of the methods beyond pitch shifting using some free plugins that were recommended.

is there a thread on that here? would love to read about that

User avatar
back2onett
Posts: 893
Joined: Sun Jan 03, 2010 3:47 pm
Location: Brizzle

Re: James Blake has done it again

Post by back2onett » Sat Jun 12, 2010 12:02 am

ketamine wrote:It sounds like a classically trained musician who "decided to do it digitally" instead of picking up instruments, and use pitch-shifted vox instead of hiring a woman to sit on his piano and sing...
Yeah I got that impression too but I don't think that's what sets him apart, surely there's quite a few classically trained musicians in the edm scene
How does I wobbled bass?

deadly_habit
Posts: 22980
Joined: Tue Oct 24, 2006 3:41 am
Location: MURRICA

Re: James Blake has done it again

Post by deadly_habit » Sat Jun 12, 2010 12:05 am

stappard wrote:
deadly habit wrote: thanks to i forget who i figured out some of the methods beyond pitch shifting using some free plugins that were recommended.

is there a thread on that here? would love to read about that
it was in that free vst thread last week i think, free autotune and voice changer plugin
the techniques i just kinda learned from me working with acapella bits or my own vox. ie: free autotune shit i used a lil on my own vox in tune in sig

User avatar
stappard
Posts: 1529
Joined: Mon Feb 09, 2009 1:56 am
Location: se5

Re: James Blake has done it again

Post by stappard » Sat Jun 12, 2010 12:20 am

deadly habit wrote:
stappard wrote:
deadly habit wrote: thanks to i forget who i figured out some of the methods beyond pitch shifting using some free plugins that were recommended.

is there a thread on that here? would love to read about that
it was in that free vst thread last week i think, free autotune and voice changer plugin
the techniques i just kinda learned from me working with acapella bits or my own vox. ie: free autotune shit i used a lil on my own vox in tune in sig

track in your sig is amazing! 8) nice one

ketamine
Posts: 4367
Joined: Wed Dec 17, 2008 8:52 pm

Re: James Blake has done it again

Post by ketamine » Sat Jun 12, 2010 1:36 am

deadly habit wrote:tune in sig
LOL I like the happy little notes that come in halfway through... what is that... guitar or piano? :lol:

cloak and dagger
Posts: 1146
Joined: Fri Jun 02, 2006 12:09 pm
Location: Sittin' on the curb debatin' how to get it percolatin'
Contact:

Re: James Blake has done it again

Post by cloak and dagger » Sat Jun 12, 2010 1:45 am

deadly habit wrote:who knows maybe it's cause i recognize the techniques and how he gets his samples. i def dig his shit a lot, just kinda feels like i've heard it before, prolly cause it's a blend of so many dif genres.

I always believed originality came from content, not the techniques used to create that content. In fact, I would say that a large amount of original music is created using very basic techniques. I guess a good example would be...uh, dubstep. I can't say my mind has been blown by the technical ability of Mala, Loefah, Skream, El-B, etc.

deadly_habit
Posts: 22980
Joined: Tue Oct 24, 2006 3:41 am
Location: MURRICA

Re: James Blake has done it again

Post by deadly_habit » Sat Jun 12, 2010 1:49 am

cloak and dagger wrote:
deadly habit wrote:who knows maybe it's cause i recognize the techniques and how he gets his samples. i def dig his shit a lot, just kinda feels like i've heard it before, prolly cause it's a blend of so many dif genres.

I always believed originality came from content, not the techniques used to create that content. In fact, I would say that a large amount of original music is created using very basic techniques. I guess a good example would be...uh, dubstep. I can't say my mind has been blown by the technical ability of Mala, Loefah, Skream, El-B, etc.
same it's just weird when you know how it's done and don't wanna bite someone else

cloak and dagger
Posts: 1146
Joined: Fri Jun 02, 2006 12:09 pm
Location: Sittin' on the curb debatin' how to get it percolatin'
Contact:

Re: James Blake has done it again

Post by cloak and dagger » Sat Jun 12, 2010 2:00 am

deadly habit wrote:
cloak and dagger wrote:
deadly habit wrote:who knows maybe it's cause i recognize the techniques and how he gets his samples. i def dig his shit a lot, just kinda feels like i've heard it before, prolly cause it's a blend of so many dif genres.

I always believed originality came from content, not the techniques used to create that content. In fact, I would say that a large amount of original music is created using very basic techniques. I guess a good example would be...uh, dubstep. I can't say my mind has been blown by the technical ability of Mala, Loefah, Skream, El-B, etc.
same it's just weird when you know how it's done and don't wanna bite someone else

I don't follow you...surely it's pretty easy to understand how most music is done these days?

User avatar
crytek
Posts: 232
Joined: Mon Jul 16, 2007 1:48 pm
Location: H-Town

Re: James Blake has done it again

Post by crytek » Sat Jun 12, 2010 3:14 am

nowaysj wrote:
ketamine wrote:and I hate Jazz
:o
Thought the same thing.


Anyhoo, first time listening this guy. Not bad. Even got the burial 'esk vox manipulation in there
Azair wrote:...equipment doesn't determine the quality of the tunes, because the creativity of mind can never be programmed by a computer.

Time is running...
|

twentz
Posts: 47
Joined: Sat Jun 05, 2010 3:25 am

Re: James Blake has done it again

Post by twentz » Mon Jun 14, 2010 2:18 am



at 0:36... white noise sweeps and kicks... #james-blake-is-not-that-original #timbaland-created-dubstep

cloak and dagger
Posts: 1146
Joined: Fri Jun 02, 2006 12:09 pm
Location: Sittin' on the curb debatin' how to get it percolatin'
Contact:

Re: James Blake has done it again

Post by cloak and dagger » Mon Jun 14, 2010 5:18 am

twentz wrote:
at 0:36... white noise sweeps and kicks... #james-blake-is-not-that-original #timbaland-created-dubstep

plus I TOTALLY know how he made that...not so special IMO

deadly_habit
Posts: 22980
Joined: Tue Oct 24, 2006 3:41 am
Location: MURRICA

Re: James Blake has done it again

Post by deadly_habit » Mon Jun 14, 2010 5:23 am

:i:
@ketamine : neither, it's a synth


Locked

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests