New "NON-INDIE" bands?

Off Topic (Everything besides dubstep)
Forum rules
Please read and follow this sub-forum's specific rules listed HERE, as well as our sitewide rules listed HERE.

Link to the Secret Ninja Sessions community ustream channel - info in this thread
nicenice
Posts: 3485
Joined: Wed Dec 16, 2009 9:50 pm
Location: London

Re: New "NON-INDIE" bands?

Post by nicenice » Mon Jun 14, 2010 2:14 pm

I've always thought of Indie as a lazy mans term.

Motorway to Roswell
Posts: 5929
Joined: Mon Nov 16, 2009 6:40 pm
Location: In that palace in the sun

Re: New "NON-INDIE" bands?

Post by Motorway to Roswell » Mon Jun 14, 2010 2:17 pm

saphyre wrote:i always thought the tag indie referred to more of a culture, and people from that culture who make rock music (it is rock music at the end of the day) get called indie
It started as a name for independent bands as in they were on independent labels and then it gradually turned into a fashion statement.

Most tags refer to a culture since people will and do build cultures round anything.

Indie seems to be used as a very general term to cover anything with guitars now that isn't metal or another obvious genre.
"...we now pause to test the soul of the Steppenwolf"

saphyre
Posts: 697
Joined: Tue Apr 07, 2009 5:37 pm

Re: New "NON-INDIE" bands?

Post by saphyre » Mon Jun 14, 2010 2:18 pm

nicenice wrote:I've always thought of Indie as a lazy mans term.
hmm people usually have a problem with genre tags being too specific, not when they're too broad

personally i call it rock, and rock music that is very experimental will be noise or drone

Motorway to Roswell
Posts: 5929
Joined: Mon Nov 16, 2009 6:40 pm
Location: In that palace in the sun

Re: New "NON-INDIE" bands?

Post by Motorway to Roswell » Mon Jun 14, 2010 2:21 pm

saphyre wrote:
nicenice wrote:
personally i call it rock, and rock music that is very experimental will be noise or drone
because the only way to be experimental within rock music is to go the wall of distortion/drone/shoegaze route.

:roll:

I don't call it anything. Names and labels get in the way.
"...we now pause to test the soul of the Steppenwolf"

saphyre
Posts: 697
Joined: Tue Apr 07, 2009 5:37 pm

Re: New "NON-INDIE" bands?

Post by saphyre » Mon Jun 14, 2010 2:23 pm

Motorway to Roswell wrote:
saphyre wrote:fashion statement.
yeah most of these artists would be considered hipsters lol. there is a lot of focus on image, be it the artists image or things like artwork and websites. but to be honest rock music has always had that element and it adds some fun i guess, its nice having records with good artwork even if it sometimes detracts from the m usic itself

Motorway to Roswell
Posts: 5929
Joined: Mon Nov 16, 2009 6:40 pm
Location: In that palace in the sun

Re: New "NON-INDIE" bands?

Post by Motorway to Roswell » Mon Jun 14, 2010 2:26 pm

saphyre wrote:
Motorway to Roswell wrote:
saphyre wrote:fashion statement.
yeah most of these artists would be considered hipsters lol. there is a lot of focus on image, be it the artists image or things like artwork and websites. but to be honest rock music has always had that element and it adds some fun i guess, its nice having records with good artwork even if it sometimes detracts from the m usic itself
Yeah. It's a sad state of affairs.
"...we now pause to test the soul of the Steppenwolf"

nicenice
Posts: 3485
Joined: Wed Dec 16, 2009 9:50 pm
Location: London

Re: New "NON-INDIE" bands?

Post by nicenice » Mon Jun 14, 2010 2:30 pm

I wouldn't say being a hipster is all about the image. You can make you art look good and care about the way you look and still not like a hipster.

Hipsters tend to make bad music and just jump on bandwagons whenever they pop up. Look what happened to the UK hardcore scene recently. Its slowly happening to dubstep and its happened to a lot of 'indie' genres like lo-fi.

saphyre
Posts: 697
Joined: Tue Apr 07, 2009 5:37 pm

Re: New "NON-INDIE" bands?

Post by saphyre » Mon Jun 14, 2010 2:33 pm

Motorway to Roswell wrote:
saphyre wrote:
nicenice wrote:
personally i call it rock, and rock music that is very experimental will be noise or drone
because the only way to be experimental within rock music is to go the wall of distortion/drone/shoegaze route.

:roll:

I don't call it anything. Names and labels get in the way.
i agree but how is calling something rock music getting in the way its just like calling something electronic music, doesnt get in the way at all its really vague i dont see why you would have a problem with it.

Motorway to Roswell
Posts: 5929
Joined: Mon Nov 16, 2009 6:40 pm
Location: In that palace in the sun

Re: New "NON-INDIE" bands?

Post by Motorway to Roswell » Mon Jun 14, 2010 2:44 pm

saphyre wrote:
Motorway to Roswell wrote:
saphyre wrote:
nicenice wrote:
personally i call it rock, and rock music that is very experimental will be noise or drone
because the only way to be experimental within rock music is to go the wall of distortion/drone/shoegaze route.

:roll:

I don't call it anything. Names and labels get in the way.
i agree but how is calling something rock music getting in the way its just like calling something electronic music, doesnt get in the way at all its really vague i dont see why you would have a problem with it.
My problem is that it doesn't need a name. As soon as you give something a name you're imposing on it and limiting it and taking attention off the music. There's no need for it.

All this is a prime example. We've all just been discussing genres for a while. We could have just been listening to music, making music etc but our attention was on labelling it rather than the music itself.

People get so wrapped up in whether it's this or that they lose sight of the music. Look at people in the dubs section etc saying "am I making dubstep?" because they want to make the label not their own music. It just dilutes everything.
"...we now pause to test the soul of the Steppenwolf"

nicenice
Posts: 3485
Joined: Wed Dec 16, 2009 9:50 pm
Location: London

Re: New "NON-INDIE" bands?

Post by nicenice » Mon Jun 14, 2010 2:53 pm

Leave it to the journalists to come up with names.

That's something good that's been coming out of music recently. A lot of things are so broad in their sound palettes that its almost impossible to pin a name on it. I say its pushing it calling a lot of producers dubstep, although they follow the rule of bass. What would you call a band like Forest Swords or Sun Araw? You could call it psychedelic but that's more a way something sounds then a specific genre.

mercutio
Posts: 286
Joined: Sun Oct 11, 2009 4:12 pm
Location: London

Re: New "NON-INDIE" bands?

Post by mercutio » Mon Jun 14, 2010 3:01 pm

a friend of mine bought me dagger paths on vinyl for my birthday without having heard it just because he liked the artwork.
i am so happy he did, i hadnt heard that mixtape until know and its incredible.
makes no difference what you call it,its just brilliant music

saphyre
Posts: 697
Joined: Tue Apr 07, 2009 5:37 pm

Re: New "NON-INDIE" bands?

Post by saphyre » Mon Jun 14, 2010 3:10 pm

personally i dont think genres are a bad thing, things like labels are much worse. case in point hyperdub, i think most of the music on hyperdub is pretty mediocre but everyone seems to love the label.

the way artists dress box them in more than anything. do you think if sun araw wore an umbro tracksuit he would get the same type of people listening to his music? obviously not

genres are convenience, theyre a necessity you have to have them just like having an artist name is a necessity. sure you can bypass that, and you can bypass being boxed in by a genre if your music genuinely sounds new but that is rare these days

User avatar
jameshk
Posts: 4530
Joined: Fri Jul 31, 2009 11:55 am

Re: New "NON-INDIE" bands?

Post by jameshk » Mon Jun 14, 2010 3:13 pm

Soundcloud
P Daley wrote:Ended up at a party last night with a bunch of people I don't know and blacked out,
Woke up this morning with an email about ordering a $70 pair of UFO pants.

nicenice
Posts: 3485
Joined: Wed Dec 16, 2009 9:50 pm
Location: London

Re: New "NON-INDIE" bands?

Post by nicenice » Mon Jun 14, 2010 3:16 pm

You need genres when you go on boomkat and want to refine your search. But its good to hear music that can't be fitting into genres. It shows something fresh and innovating. On the case of Hyperdub, I've always seen it as a very esoteric label, Kode9 can put out whatever he wants to be honest, it seems he's the targeted audience for the label anyway.

Only hipsters will care what a musician dresses like.

User avatar
WhosZena
Posts: 4504
Joined: Tue Sep 01, 2009 10:59 pm
Location: London

Re: New "NON-INDIE" bands?

Post by WhosZena » Mon Jun 14, 2010 5:32 pm

Forest swords are great.
Maybe you might like Sleigh Bells, but nah.. her voice pisses me off.

The term 'Indie' In the pop world just grates on me. I used to be proper into it, until I realised like 90% of the bands sounded the same.

I fucking love Bright Eyes ..!! Everyone knows them but hey..





Image

BaronVon
Posts: 4382
Joined: Fri Oct 27, 2006 2:05 pm
Location: Yanbu

Re: New "NON-INDIE" bands?

Post by BaronVon » Mon Jun 14, 2010 5:58 pm

mugger t wrote:<iframe src="/forum/video.php?url=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IprgVNlFIqM" frameborder="0" style="overflow:hidden; height:auto; max-width:540px"></iframe>

brilliant album
The album really is brilliant. Thanks i can't stop listening to it :D
tr0tsky wrote: InI man nuh go to nah rasclot independent ethnic butchers seen.
Selassie-I man shop in Morrisons.

User avatar
64hz
Posts: 3947
Joined: Mon Sep 07, 2009 7:34 pm

Re: New "NON-INDIE" bands?

Post by 64hz » Mon Jun 14, 2010 9:25 pm

mugger t wrote:<iframe src="/forum/video.php?url=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IprgVNlFIqM" frameborder="0" style="overflow:hidden; height:auto; max-width:540px"></iframe>

brilliant album
:o :U:

User avatar
mVI
Posts: 1372
Joined: Thu Sep 17, 2009 7:38 pm
Location: UK

Re: New "NON-INDIE" bands?

Post by mVI » Mon Jun 14, 2010 9:55 pm

brent wrote:here's some of the "rock" i've liked from the last year: ...tame impala (why won't you make your mind is amazing)...
This.


User avatar
wayoftheworld
Posts: 966
Joined: Sun Aug 02, 2009 10:25 pm
Location: Solitude, United States

Re: New "NON-INDIE" bands?

Post by wayoftheworld » Mon Jun 14, 2010 10:36 pm

I realize some of these might violate the rules of your recommendation: these aren't exactly new, and may be considered indie for all i know, but here goes anyway:

Emeralds - really great synth and guitar driven music to get lost in. very krauty and psychedelic.

Lucky Dragons - otherworldy electronic collage type stuff

Mi Ami - these guys fucking rock, and can be dubby at times

Broadcast - their new one "Broadcast and The Focus Group Investigate Witch Cults Of The Radio Age" is extremely good.

Dead Meadow - these guys to me are like nirvana if they had been more into bongs, blacklights, and late sixties psych/seventies stoner rock. amazing band live, don't skip out if you ever get a chance to see them.

Brightblack Morning Light - Slow, Hazy psychedelic r&b from the Southern U.S.....one of my favorites

Ohneotrix Point Never - recently got into them. digging it very much.
http://www.myspace.com/wizardsdeskfl - drone/doom
http://www.myspace.com/impaledbeyondallreason - grim frost-ensorcelling norsk vengeful satanic misanthropic black metal

User avatar
HamCrescendo
Posts: 3101
Joined: Thu Jul 17, 2008 9:11 pm
Location: Manchester/London

Re: New "NON-INDIE" bands?

Post by HamCrescendo » Mon Jun 14, 2010 10:53 pm

bandshell can you hit a brother up with some forest swords links? I cant find torrents anywhere and their ep seems to be sold out.

Locked

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests