Cheers mate, will investigate... thing is, its fine on safari, firefox and chrome, but somehow you see it :/futures_untold wrote:I've just had a look at the page source for you Mat.
There is one closing tag missing in the header, just at the end of the body style.
The following code:
should be:Code: Select all
body { background-image:url("http://img101.imageshack.us/img101/8289/backgroundx.jpg"); background-position:Center Center; background-attachment:fixed; border-width:0px; border-style:solid; }
Should sort out the random stuff in the screenshot I sent you.Code: Select all
body { background-image:url("http://img101.imageshack.us/img101/8289/backgroundx.jpg"); background-position:Center Center; background-attachment:fixed; border-width:0px; border-style:solid; } </style>
My DAW is better than yours! (Friendly DAW Wars debate)
					Forum rules
By using this "Production" sub-forum, you acknowledge that you have read, understood and agreed with our terms of use for this site. Click HERE to read them. If you do not agree to our terms of use, you must exit this site immediately. We do not accept any responsibility for the content, submissions, information or links contained herein. Users posting content here, do so completely at their own risk.
Quick Link to Feedback Forum
	By using this "Production" sub-forum, you acknowledge that you have read, understood and agreed with our terms of use for this site. Click HERE to read them. If you do not agree to our terms of use, you must exit this site immediately. We do not accept any responsibility for the content, submissions, information or links contained herein. Users posting content here, do so completely at their own risk.
Quick Link to Feedback Forum
Re: My DAW is better than yours! (Friendly DAW Wars debate)
- futures_untold
 - Posts: 4429
 - Joined: Thu Dec 13, 2007 9:25 pm
 - Location: London
 - Contact:
 
Re: My DAW is better than yours! (Friendly DAW Wars debate)
10 pages of love people  
 
Some nice points about software development Sunklo, but there is a spelling error on the first line, second paragraph making your arguement invalid... Call yourself a novelist do you???!
  
 
-----------------
On firefox 3.6.6 here.
Safari, Chrome, IE and Opera are all displaying it fine.
As mentioned, I'm sure it is just a matter of inserting the closing tag.
Copy and paste the whole page code into a HTML validator like http://validator.w3.org/#validate_by_input+with_options or a CSS one like http://jigsaw.w3.org/css-validator/#val ... th_options
That will list any issues line by line and often also give you ideas on resolving them.
			
			
									
									
						Some nice points about software development Sunklo, but there is a spelling error on the first line, second paragraph making your arguement invalid... Call yourself a novelist do you???!
-----------------
On firefox 3.6.6 here.
Safari, Chrome, IE and Opera are all displaying it fine.
As mentioned, I'm sure it is just a matter of inserting the closing tag.
Copy and paste the whole page code into a HTML validator like http://validator.w3.org/#validate_by_input+with_options or a CSS one like http://jigsaw.w3.org/css-validator/#val ... th_options
That will list any issues line by line and often also give you ideas on resolving them.
Re: My DAW is better than yours! (Friendly DAW Wars debate)
An nice one! I basically did some dreamweaver lessons for a uni project before. But decided i would knock this up myself, with all my html knowledge coming from 'pimping' my myspace. Lawl!futures_untold wrote:10 pages of love people![]()
Some nice points about software development Sunklo, but there is a spelling error on the first line, second paragraph making your arguement invalid... Call yourself a novelist do you???!![]()
![]()
-----------------
On firefox 3.6.6 here.
Safari, Chrome, IE and Opera are all displaying it fine.
As mentioned, I'm sure it is just a matter of inserting the closing tag.
Copy and paste the whole page code into a HTML validator like http://validator.w3.org/#validate_by_input+with_options or a CSS one like http://jigsaw.w3.org/css-validator/#val ... th_options
That will list any issues line by line and often also give you ideas on resolving them.
Can you try now, and see if its fixed?
- futures_untold
 - Posts: 4429
 - Joined: Thu Dec 13, 2007 9:25 pm
 - Location: London
 - Contact:
 
Re: My DAW is better than yours! (Friendly DAW Wars debate)
PM'd 
But yeah, Myspece pimpin' is a great way to enter the world of web coding.
That's exactly how I started too!
			
			
									
									
						But yeah, Myspece pimpin' is a great way to enter the world of web coding.
That's exactly how I started too!
Re: My DAW is better than yours! (Friendly DAW Wars debate)
What are you two nutters on about?
This thread is for whiny bickering. Please keep out all this logical nonsense you've been posting about.
			
			
									
									This thread is for whiny bickering. Please keep out all this logical nonsense you've been posting about.
Blaze it -4.20dB
						nowaysj wrote:Raising a girl in this jizz filled world is not the easiest thing.
If I ever get banned I'll come back as SpunkLo, just you mark my words.Phigure wrote:I haven't heard such a beautiful thing since that time Jesus sang Untrue
- futures_untold
 - Posts: 4429
 - Joined: Thu Dec 13, 2007 9:25 pm
 - Location: London
 - Contact:
 
Re: My DAW is better than yours! (Friendly DAW Wars debate)
We're talking about Depone's website which on my web browser is rendering part of the sitestyle on the actual page when it shouldn't... 
EDIT: Cubase really winds me up for being soo shite. 'H' & 'J' for zoom controls, common man, what's wrong with the mouse scrollwheel? And looking at FL Studio is like facerape.
			
			
													EDIT: Cubase really winds me up for being soo shite. 'H' & 'J' for zoom controls, common man, what's wrong with the mouse scrollwheel? And looking at FL Studio is like facerape.
					Last edited by futures_untold on Mon Jul 12, 2010 1:20 am, edited 1 time in total.
									
			
									
						Re: My DAW is better than yours! (Friendly DAW Wars debate)
yeah I'm getting this bit at the top: 
Firefox, Ubuntu Lucid Lynx x64 btw
			
			
									
									Code: Select all
} a:link { color: #FFFFFF; text-decoration: none; } a:visited { text-decoration: none; color: #FFFFFF; } a:hover { text-decoration: none; color: #CC0000; } a:active { text-decoration: none; color: #FFFFFF; } .style5 { font-size: 36px } .style6 {font-size: 18px} -->Blaze it -4.20dB
						nowaysj wrote:Raising a girl in this jizz filled world is not the easiest thing.
If I ever get banned I'll come back as SpunkLo, just you mark my words.Phigure wrote:I haven't heard such a beautiful thing since that time Jesus sang Untrue
Re: My DAW is better than yours! (Friendly DAW Wars debate)
hahah.... true, unless you download a skin or design one, which then makes it much much much better!futures_untold wrote:And looking at FL Studio is like facerape.
ive tried out afew DAWS to date, started out on ableton for afew months, but i didnt 'click' with it, tried reason, but really disliked the interface. FL is the only one ive 'clicked' with, so to say.
- 
				norman swashbuckle
 - Posts: 231
 - Joined: Sun Jan 18, 2009 1:48 pm
 
Re: My DAW is better than yours! (Friendly DAW Wars debate)
LOGIC
ITS MADE BY APPLE
NUFF SAID
			
			
									
									ITS MADE BY APPLE
NUFF SAID
quote jackieboi said "At the end of the day people who post on forums are all fucking sad acts anyway......."
						Re: My DAW is better than yours! (Friendly DAW Wars debate)
Yea FL's default skin is a bit "blah". At least the color choices anyway. I personally like the interface....but then again I've been using it long enough to where i'm just familiar with it so it doesn't bother me. There are some great skins out there though to make it look nicer. Unless you know how to make your own in which case you can customize it to your own tastes. I have no idea how to skin it so I just use skins I find online.A-List wrote:hahah.... true, unless you download a skin or design one, which then makes it much much much better!futures_untold wrote:And looking at FL Studio is like facerape.
ive tried out afew DAWS to date, started out on ableton for afew months, but i didnt 'click' with it, tried reason, but really disliked the interface. FL is the only one ive 'clicked' with, so to say.
It would be great if they made FL more customizable like Reaper. From what I've read though IL has no plans as of yet to allow any UI customization aside from color and button icons. As a matter of fact I think they are actually against it completely which I don't really understand. I think it would make it a much more desirable program if people had the ability to make it act more to their specifications, particularly those wanting to move from one DAW to another.
Something like this would be interesting: http://cusis.deviantart.com/art/FL-Stud ... -106501568
I probably wouldn't go with that particular design but if it was possible to customize FL in this way it would be pretty nice.
Also, for you FL users out there. If you like FL but would like to try something more customizable, try out LMMS. It's basically a program that was created to emulate FL on Linux but has been ported to windows as well. Allows for the full customization like in the picture above. Only problem is it's not entirely like FL so there's still a bit of learning when it comes to certain things.
Re: My DAW is better than yours! (Friendly DAW Wars debate)
Except renoise.futures_untold wrote: Everything else sucks because it is too expensive, looks like shit and never gets updated with user feature requests haha.
Statement of Intent VIP / Sahaquiel v4 single out now on UK Trends.
Soundcloud
Soundcloud | Bandcamp | Mixcloud | Twitter
						Soundcloud
Soundcloud | Bandcamp | Mixcloud | Twitter
Re: My DAW is better than yours! (Friendly DAW Wars debate)
The sqeetz 'MPC' skin is kind of nice, though a bit cheesy. 
FL's dark interface has advantages and disadvantages. I remember opening up Ableton Live (with the default colors) at 4 AM one night and my eyes got lazer'd out. But if I take my laptop outside and try to run FL, I always have to adjust the screen's brightness n stuff.
So I guess it depends on whether you're an insomniac cigarette or a hippie cigarette.
FPC is amazing.
			
			
									
									
						FL's dark interface has advantages and disadvantages. I remember opening up Ableton Live (with the default colors) at 4 AM one night and my eyes got lazer'd out. But if I take my laptop outside and try to run FL, I always have to adjust the screen's brightness n stuff.
So I guess it depends on whether you're an insomniac cigarette or a hippie cigarette.
FPC is amazing.
Re: My DAW is better than yours! (Friendly DAW Wars debate)
lol sig'd
			
			
									
									Blaze it -4.20dB
						nowaysj wrote:Raising a girl in this jizz filled world is not the easiest thing.
If I ever get banned I'll come back as SpunkLo, just you mark my words.Phigure wrote:I haven't heard such a beautiful thing since that time Jesus sang Untrue
Re: My DAW is better than yours! (Friendly DAW Wars debate)
There was a period in time when fl's darkness really got under my skin.  Just so metallic and drab.  But I lightened the playlist page, and put the robot in the background and all is good.
Re that dancing girl. I don't think anybody was saying the dancing girl is professional. It is a joke. The dev's play around over there. They named their gating/chopping plugin big penis for christ's sake (Gross Beat).
Re sunklo's valiant defense of reaper. True customizable, but can't customize a hot key to do that convoluted shit just to use a mulitout vst.

			
			
									
									
						Re that dancing girl. I don't think anybody was saying the dancing girl is professional. It is a joke. The dev's play around over there. They named their gating/chopping plugin big penis for christ's sake (Gross Beat).
Re sunklo's valiant defense of reaper. True customizable, but can't customize a hot key to do that convoluted shit just to use a mulitout vst.
Agreed, you make some awesome music, then we can talkDepone wrote:Make some awesome music, then we can talk
Re: My DAW is better than yours! (Friendly DAW Wars debate)
Put me down for insomniac cigarette. Straight lazered my eyes out too. I think there is a color scheme there that is far more muted though. Also a brighter one, if that is even possible.meer wrote:So I guess it depends on whether you're an insomniac cigarette or a hippie cigarette.
FPC is amazing.
If you like fpc, but have 5o bucks to burn, check out Poise. It's like the fpc with some added nice features, most notably for me, individual adsr's per sample in a layered pad, rather than fpc's one envelope per pad.
Re: My DAW is better than yours! (Friendly DAW Wars debate)
I remember going through the color schemes looking in vain for a metallic cool-grey one 
 
Poise looks pretty cool. Buuuut only 8 samples per pad is a deal breaker for me.
I'm optimistic that they'll add some updates to FPC soooomeday.
Gosh, my FPC folder has almost a gig of samples in it.
			
			
									
									
						Poise looks pretty cool. Buuuut only 8 samples per pad is a deal breaker for me.
I'm optimistic that they'll add some updates to FPC soooomeday.
Gosh, my FPC folder has almost a gig of samples in it.
Re: My DAW is better than yours! (Friendly DAW Wars debate)
I know, doomed to be shit from the start ehy?norman swashbuckle wrote:LOGIC
ITS MADE BY APPLE
NUFF SAID
Wait a minute...did you expect that to come accross as a *good* thing??!?!?
- futures_untold
 - Posts: 4429
 - Joined: Thu Dec 13, 2007 9:25 pm
 - Location: London
 - Contact:
 
Re: My DAW is better than yours! (Friendly DAW Wars debate)
That looks sick!JBE wrote:Something like this would be interesting: http://cusis.deviantart.com/art/FL-Stud ... -106501568
I hate Apple with a passion and think they are arse bandits. Nuff said.norman swashbuckle wrote:LOGIC
ITS MADE BY APPLE
NUFF SAID
You can get around that by linking cells together. You could layer 8 snares in the first pad and another 8 in the second and another 8 in the third etc, and trigger them all from just one pad.meer wrote:Poise looks pretty cool. Buuuut only 8 samples per pad is a deal breaker for me.
I'm optimistic that they'll add some updates to FPC soooomeday.
Who uses more than 8 samples in a layer anyway??
Re: My DAW is better than yours! (Friendly DAW Wars debate)
Gangsters, that's who.
			
			
									
									Blaze it -4.20dB
						nowaysj wrote:Raising a girl in this jizz filled world is not the easiest thing.
If I ever get banned I'll come back as SpunkLo, just you mark my words.Phigure wrote:I haven't heard such a beautiful thing since that time Jesus sang Untrue
Re: My DAW is better than yours! (Friendly DAW Wars debate)
velocity mapping fools
			
			
									
									
						Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests