What i'm trying to do is make a bass sound something like this, i.e. the main bass sound from about 0:42 onwards.
Any help is greatly appreciated

Electric_Head wrote:It is in fact my semen.
kingGhost wrote:can't really make those sounds with reason, you'll have to use massive prolly
what? it's the truth hahaProject EX wrote:kingGhost wrote:can't really make those sounds with reason, you'll have to use massive prolly
Electric_Head wrote:It is in fact my semen.
reason is well capable of creating any sound if you know what you're doingkingGhost wrote:what? it's the truth hahaProject EX wrote:kingGhost wrote:can't really make those sounds with reason, you'll have to use massive prolly
That is not the truth at all. Reason is totally capable.kingGhost wrote:what? it's the truth hahaProject EX wrote:kingGhost wrote:can't really make those sounds with reason, you'll have to use massive prolly
LOLkingGhost wrote:can't really make those sounds with reason, you'll have to use massive prolly
reason is good for sub tho, which is what i prefer to use. use a two thors in the same combinator, one with a midrange bass (maybe with a scream and a phaser on it) and the other set to do the sub behind it
Electric_Head wrote:It is in fact my semen.
Haha, I don't have the time or the will to write out a detailed explanation of how to make those sounds in reason but here's some simple proof that reason is capable of that and far more.kingGhost wrote:whoa, calm down. sorry i said the word massive.
i don't use massive. i use reason exclusively. and saying a DAW is just a DAW doesn't make sense... they're tools, some tools are better suited for different jobs. personally i wouldn't recommend making dubstep like in the video above, but the OP didn't ask us our opinion on that, he just asked how to make the sounds... so shut the fuck up and post how to make those sounds in reason, if you really think it's possible. because i believe you can't.
jah bless
that made me laughparavrais wrote: More boring than reading a book about paving tiles..
see? why bother when massive could create the sounds rather easilyI don't have the time or the will to write out a detailed explanation
Electric_Head wrote:It is in fact my semen.
was the rolleyes necessary bruv? sorry i didn't read that q+a, i'll do my homework next time teachBasic A wrote:The widdler did a q+a a few weeks ago and said he made froggy style in reason, then posted a breakdown![]()
Thats where it says exclusively in reason.
Electric_Head wrote:It is in fact my semen.
I think the eye roll was called for. That bass drop at 0.42 of that vid is do-able in Reason, esp Thor.kingGhost wrote:these guys seem to think, sorry, KNOW, you can create those sounds in reason
Electric_Head wrote:It is in fact my semen.
I can't listen right now but if you like any sounds I make (I do all my synth work in Reason) please tell me and I can help explain any synth in any of my tracks you would like to learn about.WeAreRobot wrote:
Any help is greatly appreciated
you are wrong you can make any sound in any programkingGhost wrote:can't really make those sounds with reason, you'll have to use massive prolly
reason is good for sub tho, which is what i prefer to use. use a two thors in the same combinator, one with a midrange bass (maybe with a scream and a phaser on it) and the other set to do the sub behind it
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests