turntables and mixer question
Forum rules
By using this "Production" sub-forum, you acknowledge that you have read, understood and agreed with our terms of use for this site. Click HERE to read them. If you do not agree to our terms of use, you must exit this site immediately. We do not accept any responsibility for the content, submissions, information or links contained herein. Users posting content here, do so completely at their own risk.
Quick Link to Feedback Forum
By using this "Production" sub-forum, you acknowledge that you have read, understood and agreed with our terms of use for this site. Click HERE to read them. If you do not agree to our terms of use, you must exit this site immediately. We do not accept any responsibility for the content, submissions, information or links contained herein. Users posting content here, do so completely at their own risk.
Quick Link to Feedback Forum
Re: turntables and mixer question
Has anyone used the Denon DNS700's or the DNS1200's? I know the 700 is entry level but i'm on a limited budget and brand new to DJing. Assuming it's worth saving and getting the 1200's though, as from what i've heard they're tried and tested as a good pair of players.
Re: turntables and mixer question
This is my set up here. Vestax PMC-07, it's about 7 years old or so, still kicking.Mapledelux wrote:abZ wrote:lolwut? Why should you give a shit about what it says on a shirt? For one thing it's an old thread and secondly that guy is a douchebag. Make up your own minds people!Mapledelux wrote:yea.. u see that dudes thread whos making a t shirt saying fuck cdjs... whats the difference?? now hes got me thinkin twice about a cdjabZ wrote:There might be. I seem to remeber seeing something like that somewhere along the line. The problem is when you gig you have to bring them with you. Really tho Serato is the solution that makes the most sense because you can do just that.Mapledelux wrote:is there a duel turntable that plays digital and vinyl that would solve all my problems
true dat found a good deal.... gna get a pair of stantons for 280$ but one is a t52x and another t52b what mixer do u use btw

Re: turntables and mixer question
I have a mk2 (from about 1985-88 i believe) and a mk5 (2004). the mk5 definitely tracks better closer to zero, post-calibration-- technics are built like tanks but that center detente on the mk2's and 3's has always been a problem; things just drift.serox wrote:
I dont think its worth paying extra for the newer models and prefer the mk2 over them. The number of new models i have been on that feel terrible is quite high!
mk2 or stfu.
w/ that said, unless you have a habit of throwing your gear off of 10 storey buildings, if you take care of technics they really will last a lifetime-- partly because of the build quality, and partly because every single part is user-replaceable-- true professional gear.
twitter.com/sharmabeats
twitter.com/SubSwara
subswara.com
myspace.com/davesharma
Low Motion Records, Soul Motive, TKG, Daly City, Mercury UK
twitter.com/SubSwara
subswara.com
myspace.com/davesharma
Low Motion Records, Soul Motive, TKG, Daly City, Mercury UK
- Mapledelux
- Posts: 511
- Joined: Thu Aug 12, 2010 11:42 pm
- Location: Long Beach CA
- Contact:
Re: turntables and mixer question
[/quote]
Last edited by Mapledelux on Wed Oct 20, 2010 3:49 am, edited 1 time in total.
- Mapledelux
- Posts: 511
- Joined: Thu Aug 12, 2010 11:42 pm
- Location: Long Beach CA
- Contact:
Re: turntables and mixer question
Mapledelux wrote:
the ole sloppy wires everywhere setup done like a true dj
Re: turntables and mixer question
Of course mk2 has a dodge area around 0, I wont lie. But I actually like the 'click' and find it usual when riding the pitch so I dont need to look. I can actually feel where I am and it helps get things right in my head. When I go on Technics without the click, I can still do it, but mk2 is where my home is.Sharmaji wrote: I have a mk2 (from about 1985-88 i believe) and a mk5 (2004). the mk5 definitely tracks better closer to zero, post-calibration-- technics are built like tanks but that center detente on the mk2's and 3's has always been a problem; things just drift.
w/ that said, unless you have a habit of throwing your gear off of 10 storey buildings, if you take care of technics they really will last a lifetime-- partly because of the build quality, and partly because every single part is user-replaceable-- true professional gear.
Don’t worry about people stealing an idea. If it’s original, you will have to ram it down their throats.
Re: turntables and mixer question
wow that picture really looks like the laptop is 2 meters away at first sight
Sharmaji wrote:2011: the year of the calloused-from-overuse facepalm
- shoot2stun
- Posts: 136
- Joined: Wed Oct 27, 2010 6:54 am
- Location: St. Louis
Re: turntables and mixer question
Ldizzy wrote:wow that picture really looks like the laptop is 2 meters away at first sight
haha hey you're right...wow freaking optical illusion. Pioneer DJM's are club standard around here...too bad I can't afford one
Re: turntables and mixer question
shoot2stun wrote:Ldizzy wrote:wow that picture really looks like the laptop is 2 meters away at first sight
haha hey you're right...wow freaking optical illusion. Pioneer DJM's are club standard around here...too bad I can't afford one
shit club standard***
Pioneer's are overrated and overpriced. I see a lot of the "good" clubs (own opinion i guess) using Allen & Heath.
Abstrakt.
Come check out my fothermucking soundcoud:
Something TOTALLY different. Really enjoyed this badboy and the melodies.
Soundcloud
Come check out my fothermucking soundcoud:
Something TOTALLY different. Really enjoyed this badboy and the melodies.
Soundcloud
Re: turntables and mixer question
Never been a fan of the EQ's on Pioneers. Rane and Allen & Heath all the way for me.B-Frank wrote:shoot2stun wrote:Ldizzy wrote:wow that picture really looks like the laptop is 2 meters away at first sight
haha hey you're right...wow freaking optical illusion. Pioneer DJM's are club standard around here...too bad I can't afford one
shit club standard***
Pioneer's are overrated and overpriced. I see a lot of the "good" clubs (own opinion i guess) using Allen & Heath.
I do not miss the center detent on MKII's at all. That shit was a hassle, you would be in the middle of a mix and anytime you got near the center, you would have to re-pitch both records.
Re: turntables and mixer question
^ yeah often.... but without it, with music thats based around the same tempo.. it could make things a little harder for blending over a long period of time... if ur just a noth away from perfect pitch...
how robust are those in comparison with the dented ones? samey?
how robust are those in comparison with the dented ones? samey?
Sharmaji wrote:2011: the year of the calloused-from-overuse facepalm
Re: turntables and mixer question
I have the M3D's which are exactly the same as the MKII's but without the center detent, the zero button and the sunken on/off switch which was another great feature as I play my turntables battle style. Like the any other 1200/1210's, they are built like tanks. I've had mine for 10 years now and they are still going strong.Ldizzy wrote:^ yeah often.... but without it, with music thats based around the same tempo.. it could make things a little harder for blending over a long period of time... if ur just a noth away from perfect pitch...
how robust are those in comparison with the dented ones? samey?
EZ
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests
