You lot seem pretty philosphical, what do you reckon?
Is time an abstract concept?
Forum rules
Please read and follow this sub-forum's specific rules listed HERE, as well as our sitewide rules listed HERE.
Link to the Secret Ninja Sessions community ustream channel - info in this thread
Please read and follow this sub-forum's specific rules listed HERE, as well as our sitewide rules listed HERE.
Link to the Secret Ninja Sessions community ustream channel - info in this thread
-
__________
- Posts: 6338
- Joined: Tue Mar 06, 2007 5:51 pm
Is time an abstract concept?
Well
Had a phat argument about this at college today, lots of different opinions on this one.
You lot seem pretty philosphical, what do you reckon?
You lot seem pretty philosphical, what do you reckon?
- rickyricardo
- Posts: 1137
- Joined: Fri Oct 07, 2005 1:36 pm
- Location: Baltimore, MD
time is a human interpretation of the universe's natural tendency toward entropy.
since the universe does not move toward entropy at a regular or predictable rate, our attempt to attach a linear progression of 'moments' is much like any other human endeavor: pointless and full of err.
since the universe does not move toward entropy at a regular or predictable rate, our attempt to attach a linear progression of 'moments' is much like any other human endeavor: pointless and full of err.
[IT BETTER BE BASS RIDDEN, GODDAMNIT...FUCK]


-
__________
- Posts: 6338
- Joined: Tue Mar 06, 2007 5:51 pm
you can talk all the shit you want about this but you still have to be in class on time dont you?
youre right about not being able to draw a perfect circle. no question about that.
also. i reckon anyone who uses sequencers for drumbeats is a neoplatonist. what do u think?
youre right about not being able to draw a perfect circle. no question about that.
also. i reckon anyone who uses sequencers for drumbeats is a neoplatonist. what do u think?
brasco wrote:evolution via youtube tutorials
-
__________
- Posts: 6338
- Joined: Tue Mar 06, 2007 5:51 pm
- rickyricardo
- Posts: 1137
- Joined: Fri Oct 07, 2005 1:36 pm
- Location: Baltimore, MD
That's not how time was originally conceived. Early man had no conception of a universe or entropy. Time was a way to segment the day and provide a collective frame of referencekomega wrote:time is a human interpretation of the universe's natural tendency toward entropy.
If you mean "existence" in the same sense that I exist right now, in this room, in front of this computer then you'd be right.£10 Bag wrote: I was trying to convince the dudes on my course that time doesn't exist, and you can't draw a perfect circle but they weren't having any of it! I was told to fuck off.
But maybe we should differentiate between something having a material "existence" and something having a social "existence". Kind of like the definition I pasted, things like "justice", "poverty", and "speed" don't have a material existence. You can't burn poverty or drink justice. But, nonetheless they are concepts that are accepted widely and manifest themselves in the material world. So I guess my arguement is that b/c such concepts are manifested materially, then they do count as having an existence....just a different kind of existence is all.
-
__________
- Posts: 6338
- Joined: Tue Mar 06, 2007 5:51 pm
Yeah I see where you (and the dudes on my course) are coming from, and obviously I wouldn't have got this far in life if I couldn't tell the time.
Maybe there is no future or past, and everything is simply present?
Anyone read 'a short history of space and time' by Microsoft Sam (aka Stephen Hawking)? I got it but I'll be damned if I can make any sense of it!
Maybe there is no future or past, and everything is simply present?
Anyone read 'a short history of space and time' by Microsoft Sam (aka Stephen Hawking)? I got it but I'll be damned if I can make any sense of it!
£10 Bag wrote:No, I have to be in class when the sun is aligned at a certain point with the earth.pompende wrote:you can talk all the shit you want about this but you still have to be in class on time dont you?
does your class really do that? i mean, that would obviously mean that the clock on the wall in your class would read differently at the start of every class, which seems like a huge inconvenience for anyone not desperate to challenge orthodox ideologies...
you know? people who believe in ideal forms that can only be imitated and aspired towards here on this broken earth.£10 Bag wrote:As for neoplatonists, I have no idea what you mean. Must be alot of them about though.
the neo part means that you dont live in classical greece.
brasco wrote:evolution via youtube tutorials
im inclined to believe this, mostly because it makes my life easier.£10 Bag wrote: Maybe there is no future or past, and everything is simply present?
you might want to start out with some basic astronomy first. like, learn about orbits, and why we have summer time versus winter time.£10 Bag wrote: Anyone read 'a short history of space and time' by Microsoft Sam (aka Stephen Hawking)? I got it but I'll be damned if I can make any sense of it!
also, einstein's special relativity should give you some fun, easy concepts about time to get excited about.
brasco wrote:evolution via youtube tutorials
-
__________
- Posts: 6338
- Joined: Tue Mar 06, 2007 5:51 pm
Nah fuck that, I read A History of Western Philosophy and that was plenty heavy enough for me!
I'm not a retard, I understand why we have seasons, but Microsoft Sam's book is a different ball game, have you seen it?! Its even weirder because how can he write when he's paralysed?
The more I know about it, the more its gonna piss me off, because there's certainly no correct answer.
Learning about time and space would just send me insane quicker.
x10
I'm not a retard, I understand why we have seasons, but Microsoft Sam's book is a different ball game, have you seen it?! Its even weirder because how can he write when he's paralysed?
The more I know about it, the more its gonna piss me off, because there's certainly no correct answer.
Learning about time and space would just send me insane quicker.
-
__________
- Posts: 6338
- Joined: Tue Mar 06, 2007 5:51 pm
I've been thinking about time recently, this is probably offtopic but fuck it: the system of time we live by is imperfect I mean we have to have leap years every four years to ensure that we stay in sync. I find it a bit strange that everything we do, every date we set, every minute we count, that something SO intrinsic an important to human existence is basically faulty.
1 thing i seem to become more convinced of every day: everyone is extremely unhappy and disatisfied with everything.
i think that the imperfection of our time system is a good synechdochic example of the general imperfection of the human experience.
now way around this really...just gotta hit the ball when you can i reckon.
i think that the imperfection of our time system is a good synechdochic example of the general imperfection of the human experience.
now way around this really...just gotta hit the ball when you can i reckon.
brasco wrote:evolution via youtube tutorials
Who cares, this is purley academic.
I mean i study Cultural therories, which are rather pointless, but this time debate is even more pointless. No offence, but i just choose to put my time into somthing which has more real world aplication and can effect things...
Like weather or not, people simply copy society because they feel thats how they should behave as a black,gay,muslim working class male.......

I mean i study Cultural therories, which are rather pointless, but this time debate is even more pointless. No offence, but i just choose to put my time into somthing which has more real world aplication and can effect things...
Like weather or not, people simply copy society because they feel thats how they should behave as a black,gay,muslim working class male.......
time does not exist. sit in an asana in a state of no-mind long enough and you'll know.
we exist in all times, and all places, in a multiverse of lifetimes simultaneously. thus, i have "past life memories" of future lives. one could argue that this is what deja vu is.
my approach to time is based more on "spiritual" perceptions than "scientific" ones. i do not fully believe in the religion of thought.
we exist in all times, and all places, in a multiverse of lifetimes simultaneously. thus, i have "past life memories" of future lives. one could argue that this is what deja vu is.
my approach to time is based more on "spiritual" perceptions than "scientific" ones. i do not fully believe in the religion of thought.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests
