Vatican Tries To Buy Britain?

[nowaysj]

Wait, the BBC is giving you a legit picture of US foreign policy?

This sounds 1000% like a scam (at any level of scale really).

But there are interesting wrinkles at the maximal end. Like if an unnamed entity did transfer say 10b into a bank account of which they have no control, and absolutely no terms for repayment... what potential future harm is there... I mean if they want to do anything about it, in acting against a nation, they have to use tanks, bombs, viruses... in which case they already have real power, and don't need the farce of a payment.

brb, unformed thoughts, but I hope you know what I'm talking about/asking.

[frank grimes jr.]

How can you make a 10b anon contribution?
Something is rotten in the state of Denmark.

[seckle]

the thing is though, if its a private foundation, that means that their holdings don't have to be publicly disclosed (ie the money is either...the vatican, swiss banks, offshore accts, etc). if its a charitable public foundation they must list assets, and the biggest charitable foundations in the world operate on $10-40billion and all their donations must be made public, so they could be excluded right away..
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_we ... oundations

the vatican has never listed their assets publicly. if you want to have a dan brown moment, and look at it from the priory of sion sort of dimension, or opus dei....it becomes a massive pandora's box. neither of those vatican linked secret organizations have ever publicly disclosed their assets and have real estate all over the world.....????? makes you wonder...who is buying all this property, and with what money....? it also could be one of several global conglomerates like suez, areva, vivendi, etc. even though these companies do have public arms in many countries, that are publicly listed; suez's history in the world is unbelievable. vivendi is another one, with enough money to buyout whole countries in a heartbeat.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Suez_(company)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vivendi
someone really needs to do a proper investigation into it all, unless we find out its all a hoax, which it very well could be

[deepfiend]

UNOITC

Infa 100%

[alien pimp]

the thing is though, if its a private foundation, that means that their holdings don't have to be publicly disclosed (ie the money is either...the vatican, swiss banks, offshore accts, etc). if its a charitable public foundation they must list assets, and the biggest charitable foundations in the world operate on $10-40billion and all their donations must be made public, so they could be excluded right away..
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_we ... oundations

the vatican has never listed their assets publicly. if you want to have a dan brown moment, and look at it from the priory of sion sort of dimension, or opus dei....it becomes a massive pandora's box. neither of those vatican linked secret organizations have ever publicly disclosed their assets and have real estate all over the world.....????? makes you wonder...who is buying all this property, and with what money....? it also could be one of several global conglomerates like suez, areva, vivendi, etc. even though these companies do have public arms in many countries, that are publicly listed; suez's history in the world is unbelievable. vivendi is another one, with enough money to buyout whole countries in a heartbeat.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Suez_(company)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vivendi
someone really needs to do a proper investigation into it all, unless we find out its all a hoax, which it very well could be

say whatever man, but i'm happy for whatever happens to you lately and i love it when i love your posts haha, like the one above
more of that!
less of the other shit!

[alien pimp]

Hopi Sen blog

Interesting. I'll confess that matters of finance tend to elude me in their subtleties, but if I gather correctly what's being strongly suggested here is:

~ that there is a "above the law" type of U.N. body whose very existence is denied, but who apparently have a track record of 'offers' like this with other nations as well as transnational corporate entities.

~ That these people - being as shadowy, powerful, and wealthy as they are - have actually been impersonated by other parties who use this assumed clout to defraud their marks.

It's not quite all sewn up though, because this is all still speculation with no concrete anything (except what Lord Blackheath himself said to cause the furor) to back it up. I am quite willing to believe, though, that Blackheath has somehow been taken in by a confidence scam.

It's murky shit, that's for sure. And it is true that deliberate destabilization followed by an offer of salvation is the M.O. used not only by financiers on the level of the Rothschilds but all the way down the line in the petty crime of racketeers and grifters of every caliber.

As for the U.S. media not picking it up - totally not surprised at all. Not only would many Americans not get it - like, implication/ramification stuff - but it would probably not get touched by major news outlets for fear of people changing the channel. I use the BBC as one of my news sources because without it I wouldn't know what my own country's foreign policy actually was.

connect this with seckle's posts and you kinda have the general idea of what's up
and from that perspective the rest of the details, from NWO to the crisis or scams like the swine flu, become just details... if they're not all real, they're quite probable anyway and that's enough to have a problem with, innit?

[alphacat]

Here's Blackheath on the news talking about it... and starting to turn it into a little bit of an excuse for mudslinging.



And the UK Treasury's not touching it with a ten foot pole:

http://www.zdnet.co.uk/blogs/communicat ... -10020975/

When all's said and done, it's also a little mindblowing that a senior member of the House of Lords admitted to laundering money for terrorist organizations - and effectively declared himself beyond sanction for it. I think that's a shocker in and of itself.

Here's something that occurred to me this morning in the place where most good thoughts occur to me... (don't ask.)

Whoever the scammer is - this is an amazingly high risk proposition, because [at least] one of the world's foremost intelligence apparati will be on your ass. If this is a scam, the con men are dead if they're not very, very careful.

Not saying that such men don't exist, but rather - a scam of this magnitude is a huge achievement of insider know-how, planning, acting, and acceptance of some serious penalties for losing. And with 'no strings attached' - doesn't that strike you as kind of an odd scam, where transfer of value appears to be one directional? How are they going to capitalize on this "gift?"

[nowaysj]

Why won't he name the organization?

He refers to the funds as not foreign national funds... does sound like the UNOITC scam.

[seckle]

more importantly, who is ever going to trust or give him the time of day again..

[noam]

its Al Qaeda

[alien pimp]

Here's Blackheath on the news talking about it... and starting to turn it into a little bit of an excuse for mudslinging.



And the UK Treasury's not touching it with a ten foot pole:

http://www.zdnet.co.uk/blogs/communicat ... -10020975/

When all's said and done, it's also a little mindblowing that a senior member of the House of Lords admitted to laundering money for terrorist organizations - and effectively declared himself beyond sanction for it. I think that's a shocker in and of itself.

Here's something that occurred to me this morning in the place where most good thoughts occur to me... (don't ask.)

Whoever the scammer is - this is an amazingly high risk proposition, because [at least] one of the world's foremost intelligence apparati will be on your ass. If this is a scam, the con men are dead if they're not very, very careful.

Not saying that such men don't exist, but rather - a scam of this magnitude is a huge achievement of insider know-how, planning, acting, and acceptance of some serious penalties for losing. And with 'no strings attached' - doesn't that strike you as kind of an odd scam, where transfer of value appears to be one directional? How are they going to capitalize on this "gift?"

once again, i like your mind

[nicenice]

Whens the film coming out?