hardware, software, tips and tricks
Forum rules
By using this "Production" sub-forum, you acknowledge that you have read, understood and agreed with our terms of use for this site. Click
HERE to read them. If you do not agree to our terms of use, you must exit this site immediately. We do not accept any responsibility for the content, submissions, information or links contained herein. Users posting content here, do so completely at their own risk.
Quick Link to Feedback Forum
-
thinking
- Posts: 4753
- Joined: Fri Oct 07, 2005 1:34 pm
- Location: Bristal
Post
by thinking » Sun Nov 21, 2010 4:31 pm
redraven wrote:dude for like $30 you can get some close eared Sennheiser HD 201 that will out perform any earbud... not the greatest of headphones in the scope of things but MUCH better than any earbud
that's absolute cobblers. I've got some midrange Sennheiser in-ears for my Cowon mp3 player and they are far more accurate than HD201s.
http://www.chemical-records.co.uk/sc/se ... ?Track=IE4
I've had those for a year and they've been absolutely fantastic. Great isolation, well-detailed and deep, controlled bass.
BLACK BOX & BOX CLEVER
paulie wrote:Thinking >>>> everyone else on this forum.
-
Sharmaji
- Posts: 5179
- Joined: Sun Jan 22, 2006 5:03 pm
- Location: Brooklyn NYC
-
Contact:
Post
by Sharmaji » Sun Nov 21, 2010 5:19 pm
around $100: etymotic er6 or 6i.
around $30-50 midrange sonys.
skullcandy are really, really garbage. tinny, shrilly, and muddy all at the same time.
twitter.com/sharmabeats
twitter.com/SubSwara
subswara.com
myspace.com/davesharma
Low Motion Records, Soul Motive, TKG, Daly City, Mercury UK
-
chronicrecords
- Posts: 472
- Joined: Fri Apr 24, 2009 11:04 pm
- Location: England
Post
by chronicrecords » Mon Nov 22, 2010 12:00 am
i had never tried skullcandies up untill a few months ago when my ipod headphones broke. lets just say i wish they broke sooner because i fking love my skullcandys now. insane low end sub bass i didnt know was possible for headphones
Skratch wrote:I have always been quite musical in my life, switching from drums to trumpet to guitar to now dub step.
-
deadly_habit
- Posts: 22980
- Joined: Tue Oct 24, 2006 3:41 am
- Location: MURRICA
Post
by deadly_habit » Mon Nov 22, 2010 12:08 am
chronicrecords wrote:i had never tried skullcandies up untill a few months ago when my ipod headphones broke. lets just say i wish they broke sooner because i fking love my skullcandys now. insane low end sub bass i didnt know was possible for headphones

-
Zebrakid
- Posts: 17
- Joined: Fri Sep 17, 2010 2:47 am
Post
by Zebrakid » Mon Nov 22, 2010 12:45 am
chronicrecords wrote:i had never tried skullcandies up untill a few months ago when my ipod headphones broke. lets just say i wish they broke sooner because i fking love my skullcandys now. insane low end sub bass i didnt know was possible for headphones
shit man I'm supporting SK a bit but

-
Zebrakid
- Posts: 17
- Joined: Fri Sep 17, 2010 2:47 am
Post
by Zebrakid » Mon Nov 22, 2010 5:14 am
Recessive Trait wrote:isn't skullcandy for 14 year old girls?
Isn't generalizing that you're cooler than someone else for no real reason like a fashion cigarette most of the reason people
legitimately hate Skull Candy?
-
evil madmen
- Posts: 996
- Joined: Sun Jul 19, 2009 6:06 pm
- Location: Dirty 630
Post
by evil madmen » Mon Nov 22, 2010 6:10 am
Shure makes decent earbuds
some are expensive but some are at a decent price
random trio wrote:Its about being a leader. Theres enough sheep out there already.
Play what you like and enjoy it.
-
Sinisterbeats
- Posts: 494
- Joined: Wed Sep 30, 2009 3:02 pm
- Location: UK
Post
by Sinisterbeats » Mon Nov 22, 2010 3:16 pm
Iv got some Sennheiser CX300's for walking to work and wearing at the gym and they sound great. Got them for under £15 I think.
-
serox
- Posts: 4899
- Joined: Fri Jan 18, 2008 9:17 am
- Location: South London
Post
by serox » Mon Nov 22, 2010 3:23 pm
Don’t worry about people stealing an idea. If it’s original, you will have to ram it down their throats.
-
FSTZ
- Posts: 7706
- Joined: Wed Oct 11, 2006 3:07 am
- Location: Cookingham
Post
by FSTZ » Mon Nov 22, 2010 4:32 pm
I'm now using the Shure E2c's (again)
I bought some Ultimate Ears and broke them within 4 months (cable was too short, snapped the 3.5mm plug off into an adapter)
-
Trichome
- Posts: 1824
- Joined: Sun Sep 19, 2010 6:26 pm
Post
by Trichome » Mon Nov 22, 2010 4:53 pm
thinking wrote:redraven wrote:dude for like $30 you can get some close eared Sennheiser HD 201 that will out perform any earbud... not the greatest of headphones in the scope of things but MUCH better than any earbud
that's absolute cobblers. I've got some midrange Sennheiser in-ears for my Cowon mp3 player and they are far more accurate than HD201s.
http://www.chemical-records.co.uk/sc/se ... ?Track=IE4
I've had those for a year and they've been absolutely fantastic. Great isolation, well-detailed and deep, controlled bass.
This 999999999999999999999x
I have these exact earbuds, and they sound absolutely brilliant.
Top notch sound quality, and they are MUCH better than HD201s imo.
that and the fact that you can't here fuck all when you have them in, even with no music playing
Soundcloud
When I first knifed man, it felt funny
Next day come, it became funny
-
serox
- Posts: 4899
- Joined: Fri Jan 18, 2008 9:17 am
- Location: South London
Post
by serox » Mon Nov 22, 2010 5:08 pm
FSTZ wrote:I'm now using the Shure E2c's (again)
I bought some Ultimate Ears and broke them within 4 months (cable was too short, snapped the 3.5mm plug off into an adapter)
One thing that pisses me off. I pay £200+ on headphones but the bit where the cable/jack meet is still the same kind of connection you get on cheap things! this small bit can ruin the damn things. I am so careful with mine but would just claim them on house insurance if needed

Don’t worry about people stealing an idea. If it’s original, you will have to ram it down their throats.
-
serox
- Posts: 4899
- Joined: Fri Jan 18, 2008 9:17 am
- Location: South London
Post
by serox » Mon Nov 22, 2010 5:15 pm
rayman612 wrote:sony
make shit EVERYTHING.
Good PR team at Sony but they make shit and overpriced everything. I use to work for Sony Europe and everything is faulty and loads of other people do things cheaper that work better.
Don’t worry about people stealing an idea. If it’s original, you will have to ram it down their throats.
-
FSTZ
- Posts: 7706
- Joined: Wed Oct 11, 2006 3:07 am
- Location: Cookingham
Post
by FSTZ » Mon Nov 22, 2010 5:33 pm
serox wrote:FSTZ wrote:I'm now using the Shure E2c's (again)
I bought some Ultimate Ears and broke them within 4 months (cable was too short, snapped the 3.5mm plug off into an adapter)
One thing that pisses me off. I pay £200+ on headphones but the bit where the cable/jack meet is still the same kind of connection you get on cheap things! this small bit can ruin the damn things. I am so careful with mine but would just claim them on house insurance if needed

yeah, considering I could've gotten some e2c's for $48 but I went ahead and bought some mid-price point U.E.'s
this will be my 3rd pair of e2c's
they usually last me about 2 years
-
DJ Crackle
- Posts: 650
- Joined: Sat Jul 24, 2010 12:54 am
-
Contact:
Post
by DJ Crackle » Mon Nov 22, 2010 5:46 pm
I do agree with a bunch of people here, for some quick, casual listening, skull candy headphones have always been enjoyable to me. also, i always liked the standard ipod headphones, although apparently they've decreased in quality. idk, haven't owned a pair of my own in years.
-
RandomEyez
- Posts: 1043
- Joined: Sun Sep 05, 2010 1:21 pm
- Location: Glasgow
Post
by RandomEyez » Mon Nov 22, 2010 11:28 pm
For me the Shure E2cs were prob the best sound quality i've head from in ear phones.
But the cable broke on two pairs so moved on to the Sennheiser CX300s which also sounded nice (watch out for the fakes though!)
Now using these as a low budget pair and they are sound surprsingly good considering! Really good noise isolation
http://reviews.cnet.co.uk/headphones/jv ... -49303601/
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests