On Harmonic Mixing

hardware, software, tips and tricks
Forum rules
By using this "Production" sub-forum, you acknowledge that you have read, understood and agreed with our terms of use for this site. Click HERE to read them. If you do not agree to our terms of use, you must exit this site immediately. We do not accept any responsibility for the content, submissions, information or links contained herein. Users posting content here, do so completely at their own risk.

Quick Link to Feedback Forum
User avatar
abZ
Posts: 5261
Joined: Sat Jan 14, 2006 6:14 pm
Location: pittsburgh
Contact:

Re: On Harmonic Mixing

Post by abZ » Sun Dec 12, 2010 7:44 pm

pompende wrote:
abZ wrote:finding key matches by intuition anyway. I dont want to say by accident because it's not.
the best way to do it without a doubt.
if you buy your vinyls and get to know the tunes youll know whats going to work. works perfect in the club too: you start off with 3-4 tunes planned in advance, watch how the crowds liking it, and then roll from there on instinct.
Yeah I know guys that will play the same set 3 gigs in a row. They don't care as long as it's perfect. If you want perfect stay at home and listen to a studio mix. I play on the edge of disaster all the time. Generally I do have some pretty bad fuck ups. It's the price you pay to hear something conceived on the spot. It's what keeps things fun for myself as well.

User avatar
amidoinitrite
Posts: 452
Joined: Tue Aug 17, 2010 5:31 pm
Location: Minneapolis, MN

Re: On Harmonic Mixing

Post by amidoinitrite » Sun Dec 12, 2010 7:47 pm

For me I've found rapid RAPID EVOLUTION quite accurate!

..The one thing I don't care for is the number system.. just one question.. why?
I label all my tunes with the actual key they are in.. not some number assigned to a key.
To me it seems more simple and a better representation of the song

I wouldn't play a lead or progression in 1A, so why would I label my tunes that way?
;)

User avatar
abZ
Posts: 5261
Joined: Sat Jan 14, 2006 6:14 pm
Location: pittsburgh
Contact:

Re: On Harmonic Mixing

Post by abZ » Sun Dec 12, 2010 7:54 pm

amidoinitrite wrote:For me I've found rapid RAPID EVOLUTION quite accurate!

..The one thing I don't care for is the number system.. just one question.. why?
I label all my tunes with the actual key they are in.. not some number assigned to a key.
To me it seems more simple and a better representation of the song

I wouldn't play a lead or progression in 1A, so why would I label my tunes that way?
I am 100% with you. We already have a pretty good system with a through g no?

User avatar
decklyn
Posts: 1551
Joined: Sun Feb 25, 2007 3:29 am
Location: Toronto, Canada

Re: On Harmonic Mixing

Post by decklyn » Sun Dec 12, 2010 10:04 pm

I think the idea was to bring the circle of fifths to those who lack a musical background. It's nomenclature - talking about music is like dancing about politics.
Image
Decklyn Dublog - Rants, Raves and Tutorials - http://www.decklyn.com
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
http://www.soundcloud.com/decklyn
Mar 18th: Seba Remix
Soundcloud

camelotsound
Posts: 7
Joined: Fri May 18, 2007 5:47 pm
Location: Las Vegas, NV, U.S.A
Contact:

Re: On Harmonic Mixing

Post by camelotsound » Sun Dec 12, 2010 10:11 pm

amidoinitrite wrote:For me I've found rapid RAPID EVOLUTION quite accurate!

..The one thing I don't care for is the number system.. just one question.. why?
I label all my tunes with the actual key they are in.. not some number assigned to a key.
To me it seems more simple and a better representation of the song

I wouldn't play a lead or progression in 1A, so why would I label my tunes that way?
The original Harmonic Keys Overlay Chart required memorization of the the relationship of 12 minor and 12 major keys, which took countless hours for people with no music education. I created the Camelot Easymix Wheel in 1991 because it allows people to easily choose harmonically compatible tracks without music education. It's as easy as telling time.

People with music education are encouraged to use the original Circle of Fifths. The Easymix system is intended for the majority without music education. It is just a shortcut, which explains its adoption as the industry standard. Nothing more, nothing less.

User avatar
drake89
Posts: 624
Joined: Wed Jan 20, 2010 2:42 am
Location: Tennessee, USA
Contact:

Re: On Harmonic Mixing

Post by drake89 » Sun Dec 12, 2010 10:58 pm

camelotsound wrote:
amidoinitrite wrote:For me I've found rapid RAPID EVOLUTION quite accurate!

..The one thing I don't care for is the number system.. just one question.. why?
I label all my tunes with the actual key they are in.. not some number assigned to a key.
To me it seems more simple and a better representation of the song

I wouldn't play a lead or progression in 1A, so why would I label my tunes that way?
The original Harmonic Keys Overlay Chart required memorization of the the relationship of 12 minor and 12 major keys, which took countless hours for people with no music education. I created the Camelot Easymix Wheel in 1991 because it allows people to easily choose harmonically compatible tracks without music education. It's as easy as telling time.

People with music education are encouraged to use the original Circle of Fifths. The Easymix system is intended for the majority without music education. It is just a shortcut, which explains its adoption as the industry standard. Nothing more, nothing less.
:n: evidence of "industry standard"? :n:

User avatar
abZ
Posts: 5261
Joined: Sat Jan 14, 2006 6:14 pm
Location: pittsburgh
Contact:

Re: On Harmonic Mixing

Post by abZ » Sun Dec 12, 2010 11:12 pm

No one I know in the industry uses it. Just sayin'.

camelotsound
Posts: 7
Joined: Fri May 18, 2007 5:47 pm
Location: Las Vegas, NV, U.S.A
Contact:

Re: On Harmonic Mixing

Post by camelotsound » Sun Dec 12, 2010 11:52 pm

abZ wrote:No one I know in the industry uses it. Just sayin'.
All leading key detection software companies (MixedInKey, Rapid Evolution, and Mixmeister) use codes for keys, in addition to Camelot Sound using keycodes since 1991.

User avatar
3za
Posts: 4605
Joined: Mon Apr 28, 2008 9:24 pm

Re: On Harmonic Mixing

Post by 3za » Mon Dec 13, 2010 12:02 am

abZ wrote:I don't even really want to get into this. I have argued with one of the developers of this system before, and will again heheh.
Fixed :6:
2 keyboards 1 computer
Sure_Fire wrote:By the way does anyone have the stems to make it bun dem? Missed the beatport comp and would very much like the ego booster of saying I remixed Skrillex.

User avatar
abZ
Posts: 5261
Joined: Sat Jan 14, 2006 6:14 pm
Location: pittsburgh
Contact:

Re: On Harmonic Mixing

Post by abZ » Mon Dec 13, 2010 12:10 am

3za wrote:
abZ wrote:I don't even really want to get into this. I have argued with one of the developers of this system before, and will again heheh.
Fixed :6:
;)

Locked

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests