Yeah I know guys that will play the same set 3 gigs in a row. They don't care as long as it's perfect. If you want perfect stay at home and listen to a studio mix. I play on the edge of disaster all the time. Generally I do have some pretty bad fuck ups. It's the price you pay to hear something conceived on the spot. It's what keeps things fun for myself as well.pompende wrote:the best way to do it without a doubt.abZ wrote:finding key matches by intuition anyway. I dont want to say by accident because it's not.
if you buy your vinyls and get to know the tunes youll know whats going to work. works perfect in the club too: you start off with 3-4 tunes planned in advance, watch how the crowds liking it, and then roll from there on instinct.
On Harmonic Mixing
Forum rules
By using this "Production" sub-forum, you acknowledge that you have read, understood and agreed with our terms of use for this site. Click HERE to read them. If you do not agree to our terms of use, you must exit this site immediately. We do not accept any responsibility for the content, submissions, information or links contained herein. Users posting content here, do so completely at their own risk.
Quick Link to Feedback Forum
By using this "Production" sub-forum, you acknowledge that you have read, understood and agreed with our terms of use for this site. Click HERE to read them. If you do not agree to our terms of use, you must exit this site immediately. We do not accept any responsibility for the content, submissions, information or links contained herein. Users posting content here, do so completely at their own risk.
Quick Link to Feedback Forum
Re: On Harmonic Mixing
- amidoinitrite
- Posts: 452
- Joined: Tue Aug 17, 2010 5:31 pm
- Location: Minneapolis, MN
Re: On Harmonic Mixing
For me I've found rapid RAPID EVOLUTION quite accurate!
..The one thing I don't care for is the number system.. just one question.. why?
I label all my tunes with the actual key they are in.. not some number assigned to a key.
To me it seems more simple and a better representation of the song
I wouldn't play a lead or progression in 1A, so why would I label my tunes that way?
..The one thing I don't care for is the number system.. just one question.. why?
I label all my tunes with the actual key they are in.. not some number assigned to a key.
To me it seems more simple and a better representation of the song
I wouldn't play a lead or progression in 1A, so why would I label my tunes that way?

Re: On Harmonic Mixing
I am 100% with you. We already have a pretty good system with a through g no?amidoinitrite wrote:For me I've found rapid RAPID EVOLUTION quite accurate!
..The one thing I don't care for is the number system.. just one question.. why?
I label all my tunes with the actual key they are in.. not some number assigned to a key.
To me it seems more simple and a better representation of the song
I wouldn't play a lead or progression in 1A, so why would I label my tunes that way?
Re: On Harmonic Mixing
I think the idea was to bring the circle of fifths to those who lack a musical background. It's nomenclature - talking about music is like dancing about politics.

Decklyn Dublog - Rants, Raves and Tutorials - http://www.decklyn.com
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
http://www.soundcloud.com/decklyn
Mar 18th: Seba Remix
Soundcloud
-
- Posts: 7
- Joined: Fri May 18, 2007 5:47 pm
- Location: Las Vegas, NV, U.S.A
- Contact:
Re: On Harmonic Mixing
The original Harmonic Keys Overlay Chart required memorization of the the relationship of 12 minor and 12 major keys, which took countless hours for people with no music education. I created the Camelot Easymix Wheel in 1991 because it allows people to easily choose harmonically compatible tracks without music education. It's as easy as telling time.amidoinitrite wrote:For me I've found rapid RAPID EVOLUTION quite accurate!
..The one thing I don't care for is the number system.. just one question.. why?
I label all my tunes with the actual key they are in.. not some number assigned to a key.
To me it seems more simple and a better representation of the song
I wouldn't play a lead or progression in 1A, so why would I label my tunes that way?
People with music education are encouraged to use the original Circle of Fifths. The Easymix system is intended for the majority without music education. It is just a shortcut, which explains its adoption as the industry standard. Nothing more, nothing less.
Re: On Harmonic Mixing
camelotsound wrote:The original Harmonic Keys Overlay Chart required memorization of the the relationship of 12 minor and 12 major keys, which took countless hours for people with no music education. I created the Camelot Easymix Wheel in 1991 because it allows people to easily choose harmonically compatible tracks without music education. It's as easy as telling time.amidoinitrite wrote:For me I've found rapid RAPID EVOLUTION quite accurate!
..The one thing I don't care for is the number system.. just one question.. why?
I label all my tunes with the actual key they are in.. not some number assigned to a key.
To me it seems more simple and a better representation of the song
I wouldn't play a lead or progression in 1A, so why would I label my tunes that way?
People with music education are encouraged to use the original Circle of Fifths. The Easymix system is intended for the majority without music education. It is just a shortcut, which explains its adoption as the industry standard. Nothing more, nothing less.


-
- Posts: 7
- Joined: Fri May 18, 2007 5:47 pm
- Location: Las Vegas, NV, U.S.A
- Contact:
Re: On Harmonic Mixing
All leading key detection software companies (MixedInKey, Rapid Evolution, and Mixmeister) use codes for keys, in addition to Camelot Sound using keycodes since 1991.abZ wrote:No one I know in the industry uses it. Just sayin'.
Re: On Harmonic Mixing
FixedabZ wrote:I don't even really want to get into this. I have argued with one of the developers of this system before, and will again heheh.

2 keyboards 1 computer
Sure_Fire wrote:By the way does anyone have the stems to make it bun dem? Missed the beatport comp and would very much like the ego booster of saying I remixed Skrillex.
Re: On Harmonic Mixing
3za wrote:FixedabZ wrote:I don't even really want to get into this. I have argued with one of the developers of this system before, and will again heheh.

Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests