"Post-dubstep"

debate, appreciation, interviews, reviews (events or releases), videos, radio shows
wolf89
Posts: 10287
Joined: Sun May 10, 2009 9:18 pm

Re: "Post-dubstep"

Post by wolf89 » Thu Jan 13, 2011 10:28 pm

fractal wrote:i feel like people also try to use these terms to distance themselves from dubstep, since they don't want to be lumped in with a bunch of robot farts and transformer sounds, which is understandable. i'm still leaving in the dream that dubstep can be whatever you want it to be, as long as it's got a good sub foundation :corndance:
Why distance yourself from the genre? You shouldn't care what people think of you

User avatar
fractal
Mako
Posts: 12133
Joined: Tue Apr 18, 2006 5:58 pm
Location: emerald city, cascadia

Re: "Post-dubstep"

Post by fractal » Thu Jan 13, 2011 10:31 pm

wolf89 wrote:
fractal wrote:i feel like people also try to use these terms to distance themselves from dubstep, since they don't want to be lumped in with a bunch of robot farts and transformer sounds, which is understandable. i'm still leaving in the dream that dubstep can be whatever you want it to be, as long as it's got a good sub foundation :corndance:
Why distance yourself from the genre? You shouldn't care what people think of you
I completely agree with you, but some people want to feel like they are creating something new

All that really matters is the music, the rest is semantics
sub.wise:.
slow down
epochalypso wrote:man dun no bout da 'nuum

wolf89
Posts: 10287
Joined: Sun May 10, 2009 9:18 pm

Re: "Post-dubstep"

Post by wolf89 » Thu Jan 13, 2011 10:45 pm

fractal wrote:
wolf89 wrote:
fractal wrote:i feel like people also try to use these terms to distance themselves from dubstep, since they don't want to be lumped in with a bunch of robot farts and transformer sounds, which is understandable. i'm still leaving in the dream that dubstep can be whatever you want it to be, as long as it's got a good sub foundation :corndance:
Why distance yourself from the genre? You shouldn't care what people think of you
I completely agree with you, but some people want to feel like they are creating something new

All that really matters is the music, the rest is semantics
Surely you can create something new and it still be dubstep though. It's a broad and progressive genre. Unless you're moving far far away. Then the name post dubstep wouldn't apply either.

User avatar
uncle bill
Posts: 920
Joined: Tue Mar 10, 2009 12:48 am
Location: Bristol

Re: "Post-dubstep"

Post by uncle bill » Thu Jan 13, 2011 10:46 pm

seckle wrote:magazines and bloggers need clicks and tweets. they want to say they "called it first" before anyone else. by declaring buzzing genres over, they know your emotions will get raised. this tactic is as old as brown bread. the media did the exact same thing to garage, 2step and jungle.
I don't think putting post- before something means anyone considers it finished with. It's more a recognition that there's lots of music around that's influenced by dubstep. Some of that is made by people from the scene, and some from outside it. I could make a 110 bpm track which wouldn't work in a dubstep set but had a bass sound that couldn't have existed before DMZ. It's been influential on all music, even non-electronic music. I don't think post-dubstep is a style of music in itself.
Hit that long lunar note and let it float ...

My blog: http://bloodredsounds.blogspot.com

That magazine I work for: http://www.venue.co.uk

My band: http://www.myspace.com/bigjoan

Twitter: http://twitter.com/bloodredsounds

Locked

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests