Just you wait3za wrote:Ain't going to happen, they are the same thingDZA wrote:Well i know fuck all about synthesis types so ill wait for someone else to lay it down for you
What's Your Favourite Synthesis Type?
Forum rules
By using this "Production" sub-forum, you acknowledge that you have read, understood and agreed with our terms of use for this site. Click HERE to read them. If you do not agree to our terms of use, you must exit this site immediately. We do not accept any responsibility for the content, submissions, information or links contained herein. Users posting content here, do so completely at their own risk.
Quick Link to Feedback Forum
By using this "Production" sub-forum, you acknowledge that you have read, understood and agreed with our terms of use for this site. Click HERE to read them. If you do not agree to our terms of use, you must exit this site immediately. We do not accept any responsibility for the content, submissions, information or links contained herein. Users posting content here, do so completely at their own risk.
Quick Link to Feedback Forum
Re: What's Your Favourite Synthesis Type?
jackmaster wrote:you went in with this mix.
Soundcloud.onelove. wrote:There needs to be a DZA app on iPhone just for id'ing old Grime tracks.
http://soundcloud.com/keepitgully http://www.mixcloud.com/slevarance/
Re: What's Your Favourite Synthesis Type?
I'm waiting...DZA wrote:Just you wait3za wrote:Ain't going to happen, they are the same thingDZA wrote:Well i know fuck all about synthesis types so ill wait for someone else to lay it down for you
2 keyboards 1 computer
Sure_Fire wrote:By the way does anyone have the stems to make it bun dem? Missed the beatport comp and would very much like the ego booster of saying I remixed Skrillex.
Re: What's Your Favourite Synthesis Type?
Subtractive VSTs are winning? BORING FORUM PEOPLE.
- upstateface
- Posts: 2607
- Joined: Thu Oct 22, 2009 6:02 pm
- Location: New York, New York (Harlem)
Re: What's Your Favourite Synthesis Type?
upstateface wrote:Samplers
@ DZA, I am still waiting
2 keyboards 1 computer
Sure_Fire wrote:By the way does anyone have the stems to make it bun dem? Missed the beatport comp and would very much like the ego booster of saying I remixed Skrillex.
-
shaneynclan
- Posts: 392
- Joined: Mon Feb 15, 2010 5:17 am
Re: What's Your Favourite Synthesis Type?
right now i'm really into Formant synthesis with FM also.
Re: What's Your Favourite Synthesis Type?
Because I'm not reproducing the sounds of voltron's digestive track after eating yellow curry, I'm with subtractive analog. Not that I have one, I'm totally va, but if that's as close as I can get, that's what I do.
Subtractive analog just sounds good pretty much across the board at the osc level, and then add to that filters that are alive, that don't step when swept, and then add to that envelopes that are really really fast... I will grant that other forms of synthesis can produce more interesting sounds, nothing produces sounds that just natively sound as good as actual subtractive analog.
I really like a good sounding fm bass from a pure pleasure perspective, but the pleasure zone there seems smaller, though the "interesting" zone is larger.
But beyond all that, subtractive is just so easy to do. It's like if I'm working on a track, and I think, I need x, I can pretty much whip out any competent va and make x pretty quickly, and get on with writing the track. The same cannot be said of fm, for example. I mean you can do simple bass patches, but hell, you can also do simple fm on a good subtractive.
Ah anyway, this argument is fallacious, because I love every synthesis technique. I love all of the different sounds and workflows, and just everything about everything.
I just love synths.
Subtractive analog just sounds good pretty much across the board at the osc level, and then add to that filters that are alive, that don't step when swept, and then add to that envelopes that are really really fast... I will grant that other forms of synthesis can produce more interesting sounds, nothing produces sounds that just natively sound as good as actual subtractive analog.
I really like a good sounding fm bass from a pure pleasure perspective, but the pleasure zone there seems smaller, though the "interesting" zone is larger.
But beyond all that, subtractive is just so easy to do. It's like if I'm working on a track, and I think, I need x, I can pretty much whip out any competent va and make x pretty quickly, and get on with writing the track. The same cannot be said of fm, for example. I mean you can do simple bass patches, but hell, you can also do simple fm on a good subtractive.
Ah anyway, this argument is fallacious, because I love every synthesis technique. I love all of the different sounds and workflows, and just everything about everything.
Re: What's Your Favourite Synthesis Type?
Good post! I like to use a variety of synthesis types. I lean toward fm and additive when I'm not using massive. I'm soooo ready for alchemy to add fm synthesis!nowaysj wrote:Because I'm not reproducing the sounds of voltron's digestive track after eating yellow curry, I'm with subtractive analog. Not that I have one, I'm totally va, but if that's as close as I can get, that's what I do.
Subtractive analog just sounds good pretty much across the board at the osc level, and then add to that filters that are alive, that don't step when swept, and then add to that envelopes that are really really fast... I will grant that other forms of synthesis can produce more interesting sounds, nothing produces sounds that just natively sound as good as actual subtractive analog.
I really like a good sounding fm bass from a pure pleasure perspective, but the pleasure zone there seems smaller, though the "interesting" zone is larger.
But beyond all that, subtractive is just so easy to do. It's like if I'm working on a track, and I think, I need x, I can pretty much whip out any competent va and make x pretty quickly, and get on with writing the track. The same cannot be said of fm, for example. I mean you can do simple bass patches, but hell, you can also do simple fm on a good subtractive.
Ah anyway, this argument is fallacious, because I love every synthesis technique. I love all of the different sounds and workflows, and just everything about everything.I just love synths.
-
makemerich
- Posts: 384
- Joined: Wed Nov 17, 2010 1:35 am
Re: What's Your Favourite Synthesis Type?
damn. to me there are 2 types of synths. some go bing. some go boom. 
£10 Bag wrote:Eat noodles, sell weed.
- futures_untold
- Posts: 4429
- Joined: Thu Dec 13, 2007 9:25 pm
- Location: London
- Contact:
Re: What's Your Favourite Synthesis Type?
Not necessarily as the sound source could be derived from a different synthesis type no?paravrais wrote:Voted granular. Really wavetable too, they are so similar and I can't possibly choose between them...but I guess I did XD
Wavetable ftw!
Re: What's Your Favourite Synthesis Type?
Aah nowaysj you've just pointed out that this question can be read in different ways. I read it as 'which is your favourite to use' rather than 'which do you like the sound of most'. Gotta love old analogue synths and samplers for sheer warmth of sound.
Re: What's Your Favourite Synthesis Type?
I wish I'd voted wavetable now.futures_untold wrote:Not necessarily as the sound source could be derived from a different synthesis type no?paravrais wrote:Voted granular. Really wavetable too, they are so similar and I can't possibly choose between them...but I guess I did XD
Wavetable ftw!
Also there's no option for whatever type of synthesis it is in alchemy where you import an image file and it turns the image into all kinds of sonic fuckery!?!?!
EDIT: Just realised there is, didn't see it before.
Re: What's Your Favourite Synthesis Type?
Yeah the Spectral synthesis engine in Alchemy is pretty sweet, and pretty easy to grasp. 
“The only way to make sense out of change is to plunge into it, move with it, and join the dance.”
Alan Watts
"Imagination will often carry us to worlds that never were. But without it we go nowhere."
Carl Sagan
Alan Watts
"Imagination will often carry us to worlds that never were. But without it we go nowhere."
Carl Sagan
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests