
me, you and everyone we know
brilliant film



i kinda thought that was the pointlloydnoise wrote:brilliant film
just had a lazy weekend:
all very good, Paprika is amazing and The Thing is obviously a stone cold classic
Saw Black Swan at the cinema, thought it was ok but Portman was annoying imo, made the whole thing harder to watch with her plaguing whingy face


TopManLurka wrote:seckle yourself.
Nevalo wrote:All right. But you tell that slag, that in the ghetto, washing non-colourfast synthetics at 60 degrees could cost you your life...
DRTY wrote:Nan is up there with my cats. Harm them; pay with your life.
wub wrote:Shenanigans
ch3 wrote:shenanigans
aka Howard Marks' life.AntlionUK wrote:Mr. Nice was such let down for me, just seemed like some kids uni film project about how awesome weed is.

http://www.soundcloud.com/particleimami wrote:i put secret donks in all my tunes, just low enough so you can't hear them

wormcode wrote: kingldub Re: Mulholland Dr.
It should become clear after the second or 3rd viewings. Typical Lynch film (though no doubt his most "accessible") with his same style and visual "keys" to identify what is happening such as red drapes/lights/etc. Also there is always a beginning, a middle and an end. Just never in that order. I'd suggest against reading about it online and figure it out for yourself as that's how his films are most fulfilling. Interesting: Last year the American Film Institute named it Film of the Decade.
exactly. Iv seen mullholland drive maybe 10 times, had a few epiphany moments probably 3rd viewing. Read the '10 things to look out for' in the paper inset. Easily in my top 10 all time films, really a beautiful piece of work. Would personally say Blue Velvet is his most accessible film tho.wormcode wrote: kingldub Re: Mulholland Dr.
It should become clear after the second or 3rd viewings. Typical Lynch film (though no doubt his most "accessible") with his same style and visual "keys" to identify what is happening such as red drapes/lights/etc. Also there is always a beginning, a middle and an end. Just never in that order. I'd suggest against reading about it online and figure it out for yourself as that's how his films are most fulfilling. Interesting: Last year the American Film Institute named it Film of the Decade.
Anyone else seen "I'm Still Here"? It's one of those "love it or hate it" type things. If you're into awkward comedy and especially into satire/mockumentary type things I think you'd enjoy it. I've seen it a couple of times now and haven't laughed and cringed at the same time this much in a long time. The scene where he is playing Puff Daddy his demo CD in his studio is too fucking good.

I think there's truth in it yeah. It works more as a satire to me though, they said it was basically a response to how people believe reality tv is real. That makes sense then. Also the credits reveal some of the people aren't real, like his dad is actually played by Casey Affleck's dad, and a few others as well.christophera wrote:i'm certain I'm Still Here is real. they say it's a hoax, but i don't think joaquin is a genius at all. i think he's really an asshole who thinks he can rap.


first time i've ever detected doubt in your belief you are right lolchristophera wrote:i'm certain I'm Still Here is real. they say it's a hoax, but i don't think joaquin is a genius at all. i think he's really an asshole who thinks he can rap.

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests