Datsik Bass? No Problem!

hardware, software, tips and tricks
Forum rules
By using this "Production" sub-forum, you acknowledge that you have read, understood and agreed with our terms of use for this site. Click HERE to read them. If you do not agree to our terms of use, you must exit this site immediately. We do not accept any responsibility for the content, submissions, information or links contained herein. Users posting content here, do so completely at their own risk.

Quick Link to Feedback Forum
MT Dubstep
Posts: 10
Joined: Fri Jul 23, 2010 9:22 am

Datsik Bass? No Problem!

Post by MT Dubstep » Tue Mar 15, 2011 7:25 pm

:t: Hey guys, my first post on here, and I thought I'd save it for something good!

Basically, I was messing around trying to make a decent bass and eventually from piling loads of sounds+effects on I got this!
Soundcloud
So everybody who wants to scrape the bass, Get something heavy and pile as many other synths/basses on (you don't have to go too crazy, I had about 3 or 4 sounds piled up) Add flanges + vocoders, tweak the LFO to your liking, and BOOM!

Your one step closer to the bass, this is only a rough guideline on how I made MY bass, I have not yet finished tweaking it, and if I get any closer I will make another post on how I did it.

If anybody has anything to add please do!

Thanks,
MT
:z:

User avatar
ToxicBass
Posts: 217
Joined: Sun Oct 24, 2010 3:58 pm
Location: Manchester, UK
Contact:

Re: Datsik Bass? No Problem!

Post by ToxicBass » Tue Mar 15, 2011 7:37 pm

If you put this much effort into making a 'MT Productionz' bass patch I think you'd be onto something.
Trying to get on MTV is like trying to be employee of the month at McDonald's.
Soundcloud

shadowprotocol
Posts: 23
Joined: Thu Mar 10, 2011 9:47 pm

Re: Datsik Bass? No Problem!

Post by shadowprotocol » Tue Mar 15, 2011 7:40 pm

While the sound is cool, he's right. Take this knowledge you have now and try to find a way to make it original. Find your own sound

User avatar
Gewze
Posts: 2660
Joined: Wed Sep 22, 2010 10:07 pm

Re: Datsik Bass? No Problem!

Post by Gewze » Tue Mar 15, 2011 7:42 pm

was pleasantly surprised, thought it would be more shit but its proper catchy. very nice sound, didnt like the high pitched noise though, felt like my ear drums ripped.

MT Dubstep
Posts: 10
Joined: Fri Jul 23, 2010 9:22 am

Re: Datsik Bass? No Problem!

Post by MT Dubstep » Tue Mar 15, 2011 7:46 pm

I agree with you, I thought I should post it to help everyone who wanted to create it, as I've seen these posts since day one of been on the forum.
I doubt people will stop posting though :/

And I seriously could not find a decent synth to go with the bass so I went with something painful :)

User avatar
Dreadfunk
Posts: 169
Joined: Thu Jan 20, 2011 6:30 pm

Re: Datsik Bass? No Problem!

Post by Dreadfunk » Tue Mar 15, 2011 9:30 pm

Sounds like a basic wobble with some effects on it :P Not to say it doesn't sound nice, but definitely not something I hear and go "how'd he do that?!"

User avatar
Filthzilla
Posts: 1265
Joined: Mon Dec 20, 2010 4:42 pm
Location: London
Contact:

Re: Datsik Bass? No Problem!

Post by Filthzilla » Wed Mar 16, 2011 12:13 pm

Render the bass as and audio file...
Clone it, so you've got two indentical copies.
Pan 1 to hard left, Pan 1 to hard right.
Play them both togethter but move one of them ever so slightly so that they're displaced.

Sounds whack. ^_^

User avatar
CBK81
Posts: 291
Joined: Fri Apr 16, 2010 3:58 am

Re: Datsik Bass? No Problem!

Post by CBK81 » Wed Mar 16, 2011 12:43 pm

That doesn't sound like the datsik bass to me.

User avatar
Basic A
Posts: 6037
Joined: Tue Jan 19, 2010 10:53 am
Location: Pittsburgh - You might know me as Teknicyde
Contact:

Re: Datsik Bass? No Problem!

Post by Basic A » Wed Mar 16, 2011 1:03 pm

Massive > Osc 1 carbon > Unison to 5-8, enable wavetable position unison, set it to the very center of the slider, slightly to the left. lowpass 4 on filter 1, lfo its cutoff + osc amp 1, automate osc 1 position to get it talking, insert teletube in fx1 and the expander to fx2... Call it retreat/swagga...

Oh shit did I demystify that? Im sorry =/...
Soundcloud
Soundcloud

Image
:::::: Basic A. ::::: [url=hhttp://soundcloud.com/teknicyde]Teknicyde[/url] ::::: [url=hhttp://soundcloud.com/drjinx]Dr. J!nx[/url] :::::
Phantom Hertz - Fentplates - Reboot Records - Cosmology - Applied Mathematics

User avatar
Kes-Es
Posts: 772
Joined: Mon Nov 15, 2010 6:32 am
Location: Clovis NM

Re: Datsik Bass? No Problem!

Post by Kes-Es » Wed Mar 16, 2011 1:27 pm

Sounds like a basic wobble with a flange on it.

I am disappoint.
A conglomeration of my old tearout tunes I like, and my new ones I don't
Soundcloud

User avatar
ramses020
Posts: 111
Joined: Thu Jul 15, 2010 10:40 am
Location: Amsterdam

Re: Datsik Bass? No Problem!

Post by ramses020 » Wed Mar 16, 2011 2:05 pm

Basic A wrote:Massive > Osc 1 carbon > Unison to 5-8, enable wavetable position unison, set it to the very center of the slider, slightly to the left. lowpass 4 on filter 1, lfo its cutoff + osc amp 1, automate osc 1 position to get it talking, insert teletube in fx1 and the expander to fx2... Call it retreat/swagga...

Oh shit did I demystify that? Im sorry =/...
What is there to demystify? Basic starting point, basses like that are all about the processing anyways.

@OP, quite an ok bass, just don't think about it in terms of Datsik/Skrillex whatever.

User avatar
Basic A
Posts: 6037
Joined: Tue Jan 19, 2010 10:53 am
Location: Pittsburgh - You might know me as Teknicyde
Contact:

Re: Datsik Bass? No Problem!

Post by Basic A » Wed Mar 16, 2011 3:54 pm

ramses020 wrote:
Basic A wrote:Massive > Osc 1 carbon > Unison to 5-8, enable wavetable position unison, set it to the very center of the slider, slightly to the left. lowpass 4 on filter 1, lfo its cutoff + osc amp 1, automate osc 1 position to get it talking, insert teletube in fx1 and the expander to fx2... Call it retreat/swagga...

Oh shit did I demystify that? Im sorry =/...
What is there to demystify? Basic starting point, basses like that are all about the processing anyways.

@OP, quite an ok bass, just don't think about it in terms of Datsik/Skrillex whatever.
Buuut, thats not a basic starting point, its a finished patch, and isnt gonna require jack for post-processing aside from a reverb to color it in with the rest of the track, just modulating whats in the synth and layering with a bunch of sweeps... worst case scenario, a filterbank, but no extreme post processing... I think a big part of what keeps these brostep sounds so out of peoples reach is there trying to turn them out using a bunch of distortion units and flangers and complicated effects chains shit when people should be more minimally minded and learn their synths... And even then, when learning the synths, they overcomplicate things, instead of realizing the simplest route is probably the correct one (isnt that like a law of physics?)... The resampling thing is to keep the filters moving, not to pile on 8million distortion units and shit.

The sounds should be right coming out of your synth. Always. Stop trying to polish turds with a million post-effects, and make simple, effective patches instead.

Bro basses are 99% of the time very basic patches like that, layered with a ton of sweeps. IDK what skrillex even sounds like, Ive never heard his music, so I cant comment on that, but, I think people GROSSLY overestimate the amount of post-processing being done to datscision sounds, and ignore the power of simple patches because of it. :W:

Simple things tend to be what sound most stunning. Its NOT all about processing. Its about efective sound design.
Soundcloud
Soundcloud

Image
:::::: Basic A. ::::: [url=hhttp://soundcloud.com/teknicyde]Teknicyde[/url] ::::: [url=hhttp://soundcloud.com/drjinx]Dr. J!nx[/url] :::::
Phantom Hertz - Fentplates - Reboot Records - Cosmology - Applied Mathematics

hasezwei
Posts: 2615
Joined: Wed Jul 21, 2010 2:27 pm

Re: Datsik Bass? No Problem!

Post by hasezwei » Wed Mar 16, 2011 4:15 pm

Basic A wrote:
ramses020 wrote:
Basic A wrote:Massive > Osc 1 carbon > Unison to 5-8, enable wavetable position unison, set it to the very center of the slider, slightly to the left. lowpass 4 on filter 1, lfo its cutoff + osc amp 1, automate osc 1 position to get it talking, insert teletube in fx1 and the expander to fx2... Call it retreat/swagga...

Oh shit did I demystify that? Im sorry =/...
What is there to demystify? Basic starting point, basses like that are all about the processing anyways.

@OP, quite an ok bass, just don't think about it in terms of Datsik/Skrillex whatever.
Buuut, thats not a basic starting point, its a finished patch, and isnt gonna require jack for post-processing aside from a reverb to color it in with the rest of the track, just modulating whats in the synth and layering with a bunch of sweeps... worst case scenario, a filterbank, but no extreme post processing... I think a big part of what keeps these brostep sounds so out of peoples reach is there trying to turn them out using a bunch of distortion units and flangers and complicated effects chains shit when people should be more minimally minded and learn their synths... And even then, when learning the synths, they overcomplicate things, instead of realizing the simplest route is probably the correct one (isnt that like a law of physics?)... The resampling thing is to keep the filters moving, not to pile on 8million distortion units and shit.

The sounds should be right coming out of your synth. Always. Stop trying to polish turds with a million post-effects, and make simple, effective patches instead.

Bro basses are 99% of the time very basic patches like that, layered with a ton of sweeps. IDK what skrillex even sounds like, Ive never heard his music, so I cant comment on that, but, I think people GROSSLY overestimate the amount of post-processing being done to datscision sounds, and ignore the power of simple patches because of it. :W:

Simple things tend to be what sound most stunning. Its NOT all about processing. Its about efective sound design.

word on that. the magic of resampling in the signature datsik bass (you know, the one in 'boom' for example) is that they pasted together parts off a couple different versions of the same sound. they probably just looped it, played around with the filters and then picked what sounded good together.
the skrillex bass in scatta however is probably layered with shittons of foley but fuck it i'll never figure that one out anyway ;-)
Basic A, while i totally respect never having listened to skrillex (his music is a metaphor for everything that's wrong with my generation) you should at least check the sound at 0:40 here.


just saying, i hate the music but i can't help wanting to know the processes behind that bass. that's some hollywood sounddesign shit right there (maybe he just paid a studio to make that sound for him :6: )

User avatar
lyons238
Permanent Vacation
Posts: 1725
Joined: Tue May 04, 2010 12:04 am
Location: USA - Providence, RI

Re: Datsik Bass? No Problem!

Post by lyons238 » Wed Mar 16, 2011 5:12 pm

doesn't sound like datsik to me. datsiks basslines usually dont have much harmonics once hes done with them. i can still hear some in this bass line. it is a catchy tune though. nicely done. but i wouldn't call that a datsik bass. his are more growly and morphy sounding lol. and eq that high pitch sound a bit so its not so harsh.

keep at it. nice tune.
New WIP (not much I know)
Soundcloud
Delayed WIP
Soundcloud
Image
Dark Matter

User avatar
Dreadfunk
Posts: 169
Joined: Thu Jan 20, 2011 6:30 pm

Re: Datsik Bass? No Problem!

Post by Dreadfunk » Wed Mar 16, 2011 7:58 pm

Resampling has a lot less to it than most people think.

The main benefit is that you can move the sounds around and frankenstein 3-4 different basses together instead of playing the synth like an insrument with midi, you're taking the sounds you like out of it and rearranging them to make weird / interesting basses. Learning how to do frankenbasses and getting your head out of actual notes is how you get those crazy brostep basses. It's usually the interaction of complex LFO stuff (you can take 3/8ths of an LFO cycle if you want and jam it onto another sound thats oscillating at a completely different speed) and glide in places you wouldn't expect it.

It's less about processing, though that's important too. Mostly weird filters (Fab Filter Volcano, Tone2Bifilter) are all you need to mangle basses sufficiently. Mangle em in 3-4 different ways, resample, and splice.

That's the concept. It takes a lot of practice to do it right and get usable and interesting results. And that's all datsik does to make his basses. Fuck around, splice shit, and keep trying until something cool comes out of it.

User avatar
Muta
Posts: 158
Joined: Fri Feb 26, 2010 4:52 pm

Re: Datsik Bass? No Problem!

Post by Muta » Thu Mar 17, 2011 5:05 am

Basic A wrote:
ramses020 wrote:
Basic A wrote:Massive > Osc 1 carbon > Unison to 5-8, enable wavetable position unison, set it to the very center of the slider, slightly to the left. lowpass 4 on filter 1, lfo its cutoff + osc amp 1, automate osc 1 position to get it talking, insert teletube in fx1 and the expander to fx2... Call it retreat/swagga...

Oh shit did I demystify that? Im sorry =/...
What is there to demystify? Basic starting point, basses like that are all about the processing anyways.

@OP, quite an ok bass, just don't think about it in terms of Datsik/Skrillex whatever.
Buuut, thats not a basic starting point, its a finished patch, and isnt gonna require jack for post-processing aside from a reverb to color it in with the rest of the track, just modulating whats in the synth and layering with a bunch of sweeps... worst case scenario, a filterbank, but no extreme post processing... I think a big part of what keeps these brostep sounds so out of peoples reach is there trying to turn them out using a bunch of distortion units and flangers and complicated effects chains shit when people should be more minimally minded and learn their synths... And even then, when learning the synths, they overcomplicate things, instead of realizing the simplest route is probably the correct one (isnt that like a law of physics?)... The resampling thing is to keep the filters moving, not to pile on 8million distortion units and shit.

The sounds should be right coming out of your synth. Always. Stop trying to polish turds with a million post-effects, and make simple, effective patches instead.

Bro basses are 99% of the time very basic patches like that, layered with a ton of sweeps. IDK what skrillex even sounds like, Ive never heard his music, so I cant comment on that, but, I think people GROSSLY overestimate the amount of post-processing being done to datscision sounds, and ignore the power of simple patches because of it. :W:

Simple things tend to be what sound most stunning. Its NOT all about processing. Its about efective sound design.
Actually, I used to think al that shit about piling up 8million FX-units and keep processing it till I thought I would die, etc.
But since that never has worked out properly for me I started just to fuck around in the actual synth and get some more proper sound-design skills within that synth. Now may I say, I can get alot closer to these brostep basses that way. I dont resample my bass anymore, just some camelphat, Maybe some effectrix en some other kind of filter-thingy maybe on the FX-chain, but that really is it.

Gets me alot closer to them basses instead of resampling to death. (if you want to hear an example, theres a tune in my sig. not saying it is proper Datsicion, just saying that realizing this got me a step closer.)
Soundcloud

Any feedback much appreciated!! -Soundcloud comment it

collective
Posts: 643
Joined: Sun Aug 10, 2008 9:16 pm

Re: Datsik Bass? No Problem!

Post by collective » Thu Mar 17, 2011 6:24 am

hasezwei wrote:.
the skrillex bass in scatta however is probably layered with shittons of foley but fuck it i'll never figure that one out anyway ;-)
Basic A, while i totally respect never having listened to skrillex (his music is a metaphor for everything that's wrong with my generation) you should at least check the sound at 0:40 here.

that bass is only a simple wobble bass layered with 2-3 vocals run through vocoders...real obvious on that one.

User avatar
Ldizzy
Posts: 1651
Joined: Wed Feb 03, 2010 9:47 am

Re: Datsik Bass? No Problem!

Post by Ldizzy » Thu Mar 17, 2011 6:35 am

Go to the datsik thread and listen to ur patch again. do a lot of a/b in...

u still need some improvement and some people do it even better then this... and they still get told that its useless to do such things nowadays ( cant agree wit that tho)
Sharmaji wrote:2011: the year of the calloused-from-overuse facepalm

jaydot
Posts: 5860
Joined: Sat Dec 05, 2009 10:34 am
Location: Your place or hers?

Re: Datsik Bass? No Problem!

Post by jaydot » Thu Mar 17, 2011 7:46 am

It sounds not too bad... :) Not a sound I'd go for though...like people say try creating your own bass styles. I've really been getting to know NI Massive recently and although I'm not creating what I'd call unique sounds I'm trying to be original, which is goood.
Soundcloud

Soundcloud

tweet @jaydotdubstep

REAP3RMusic
Posts: 85
Joined: Fri Nov 19, 2010 7:10 pm

Re: Datsik Bass? No Problem!

Post by REAP3RMusic » Thu Mar 17, 2011 12:18 pm

collective wrote:
hasezwei wrote:.
the skrillex bass in scatta however is probably layered with shittons of foley but fuck it i'll never figure that one out anyway ;-)
Basic A, while i totally respect never having listened to skrillex (his music is a metaphor for everything that's wrong with my generation) you should at least check the sound at 0:40 here.

that bass is only a simple wobble bass layered with 2-3 vocals run through vocoders...real obvious on that one.
Massive > Modern Talking in OSC1 > WT Position on full > Resample and split the frequencies > Low Pass filter on the high band > Overdrive on the mid band.
collective wrote:
hasezwei wrote:
Ldizzy wrote: skrillex does very fast-foodish synthesis... so i dont even doubt it...
fastfoodish? i work at burger king and have no idea wtf you mean by that :lol:

maybe thats why you work at burger king :6:

Locked

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests