Resampling procedure?

[hasezwei]

How come you dont use the LFO in massive?

Why would you do that if you're re-sampling?


I technically don't re-sample. today, I developed a technique in which I send the original synth to 3 different tracks, 1 high, 1 mid, 1 low. Then I add the effects. If nessesary, I link those three to another, which is then re-linked to three more.
All my automations are done by sending the final mixer tracks for each initial sound to one with my fruity fast LP.

Seems confusing, but works a fucking charm for a noob like myself

If you're wondering "Why the fuck would you go to that trouble", I never know when I'll want to change a bassline, this enables me to modify notation in MIDI, while maintaining my initial sound

you're missing out on the biggest benefit of resampling like that tho... being able to chop out individual parts of different basslines and pasting them together to create something truly mindblowing (which is how 'the big guys' do it). it's way easier to do it like that than having 4 or 5 instances of massive running parallel with different patches.

[zerbaman]

How come you dont use the LFO in massive?

Why would you do that if you're re-sampling?


I technically don't re-sample. today, I developed a technique in which I send the original synth to 3 different tracks, 1 high, 1 mid, 1 low. Then I add the effects. If nessesary, I link those three to another, which is then re-linked to three more.
All my automations are done by sending the final mixer tracks for each initial sound to one with my fruity fast LP.

Seems confusing, but works a fucking charm for a noob like myself

If you're wondering "Why the fuck would you go to that trouble", I never know when I'll want to change a bassline, this enables me to modify notation in MIDI, while maintaining my initial sound

you're missing out on the biggest benefit of resampling like that tho... being able to chop out individual parts of different basslines and pasting them together to create something truly mindblowing (which is how 'the big guys' do it). it's way easier to do it like that than having 4 or 5 instances of massive running parallel with different patches.

Not missing, that's just not how I write tunes, I know about that, just don't do it that way. The aim is to sound unique, rather than be another copy

[hasezwei]

How come you dont use the LFO in massive?

Why would you do that if you're re-sampling?


I technically don't re-sample. today, I developed a technique in which I send the original synth to 3 different tracks, 1 high, 1 mid, 1 low. Then I add the effects. If nessesary, I link those three to another, which is then re-linked to three more.
All my automations are done by sending the final mixer tracks for each initial sound to one with my fruity fast LP.

Seems confusing, but works a fucking charm for a noob like myself

If you're wondering "Why the fuck would you go to that trouble", I never know when I'll want to change a bassline, this enables me to modify notation in MIDI, while maintaining my initial sound

you're missing out on the biggest benefit of resampling like that tho... being able to chop out individual parts of different basslines and pasting them together to create something truly mindblowing (which is how 'the big guys' do it). it's way easier to do it like that than having 4 or 5 instances of massive running parallel with different patches.

Not missing, that's just not how I write tunes, I know about that, just don't do it that way. The aim is to sound unique, rather than be another copy

wise words. just checked your sig for reference, allow me to post OT... any chance of hearing the full track?

[zerbaman]

How come you dont use the LFO in massive?

Why would you do that if you're re-sampling?


I technically don't re-sample. today, I developed a technique in which I send the original synth to 3 different tracks, 1 high, 1 mid, 1 low. Then I add the effects. If nessesary, I link those three to another, which is then re-linked to three more.
All my automations are done by sending the final mixer tracks for each initial sound to one with my fruity fast LP.

Seems confusing, but works a fucking charm for a noob like myself

If you're wondering "Why the fuck would you go to that trouble", I never know when I'll want to change a bassline, this enables me to modify notation in MIDI, while maintaining my initial sound

you're missing out on the biggest benefit of resampling like that tho... being able to chop out individual parts of different basslines and pasting them together to create something truly mindblowing (which is how 'the big guys' do it). it's way easier to do it like that than having 4 or 5 instances of massive running parallel with different patches.

Not missing, that's just not how I write tunes, I know about that, just don't do it that way. The aim is to sound unique, rather than be another copy

wise words. just checked your sig for reference, allow me to post OT... any chance of hearing the full track?

Add me on AIM
Forthcoming to plush recordings

[Sparxy]

How do you split the freqs and send them to different tracks?

I use FL Studio's "Maximus"
I just mute the 2 bands I don't want on each track

Or just use any standard EQing tool and roll off high and low to seperate different frequency ranges on different tracks

I was thinking about just doing that since I'm using ableton. Do you know if ableton has an equivalent tool to Maximus?

Yes mate - I also use Ableton and use EQ8 to seperate stuff by frequency

[Sparxy]

How do you split the freqs and send them to different tracks?

I use FL Studio's "Maximus"
I just mute the 2 bands I don't want on each track

Or just use any standard EQing tool and roll off high and low to seperate different frequency ranges on different tracks

That's not what I do though..

Before you get your knickers in a twist. I'm not saying that I'm right and that's the only way. But that's quite simply not my preferred option. Each to their own.

I wasn't knocking your methods mate, I was just saying if you're not an FL user and have Maximus (which is quite specific as there are a range of DAWs and tools) then there are other ways to do it.
A good example is me, I don't use FL and have no idea what Maximus is, so your post was useless to me. So I simply offered another option.

[Barka]

try putting an audio effects rack on the channel and put 3 EQ3s into that, solo the lows on one, mids on another, and highs on the last. you can tweak the frequencies as you like. and then you can apply any sorts of effects to the differents bands by putting the fx right after their respective EQ3s. (be careful not to put em after the whole rack unless you want to apply an effect to the whole unified signal)

hope that made some sense

[djwhupass]

the multiband dynamics effect can be used to split frequencys in ableton.

check this out:

http://www.quantizecourses.com/pages.php/?p=895