it can be summed up withAxeD wrote:NSFWP, needs summary for working people




it can be summed up withAxeD wrote:NSFWP, needs summary for working people
Because they value artistic endeavour and recognise the very real living expenses that 99.9% of artists must meet?djbmc wrote:it's a shame but free music is cultural now, ppl won't even pay 20p for a tune, and why should they when everything is free elsewhere?
I don't know about this, brubs, it sure seems like that at the moment, doesn't it, but there is little to suggest that the internet will remain open. There are many forces at work that may close the internet entirely. One of the major forces being that as the content producers consolidate their ownership of the physical networks, it is likely they will only allow their own or other validated content to move over their networks. This could be stopped by legislation, but can anyone kid themselves that the people have the ability to express their norms and values through government?alphacat wrote:We can't legislate computers and ISP's out of existence - and that would be the only way anybody could definitively put a halt to all of the "bad" stuff
as people over on GS like to quote constantlynowaysj wrote: it sure seems like that at the moment, doesn't it, but there is little to suggest that the internet will remain open. There are many forces at work that may close the internet entirely. One of the major forces being that as the content producers consolidate their ownership of the physical networks,
and thisnowaysj wrote:but there is little to suggest that the internet will remain open. There are many forces at work that may close the internet entirely. One of the major forces being that as the content producers consolidate their ownership of the physical networks, it is likely they will only allow their own or other validated content to move over their networks.
sad but true, give it another 20 years and most stuff on the net will be proprietarysymmetricalsounds wrote:the problem is that their view seems to want to turn the net into just another medium for pushing things that can be bought and sold. the internet is one of the greatest things we've ever created and it wouldn't be at all surprising if we turned it into another piece of shit.
yeah and when that happens i'll be happy to take the leap back and use some dialup to get onto some geeky dudes BBSjobbanaught wrote: sad but true, give it another 20 years and most stuff on the net will be proprietary
Yeah, no normative implication to what I was saying. Just pointing out that it probably won't be like this for too long.symmetricalsounds wrote:the problem with this is that their view seems to want to turn the net into just another medium for pushing things that can be bought and sold. the internet is one of the greatest things we've ever created and it wouldn't be at all surprising if we turned it into another piece of shit.
symmetricalsounds wrote:yeah and when that happens i'll be happy to take the leap back and use some dialup to get onto some geeky dudes BBSjobbanaught wrote: sad but true, give it another 20 years and most stuff on the net will be proprietary
no but theoretically you could create a wireless network and if you had enough people in close proximity to each other you could create a network that chained through and have a BBS-style service running on that. by that time there's surely gotta be a way to boost the wireless signal that the initial computer gave out thus making it easier to create the chain.nowaysj wrote:cept there will be no phone service then...![]()
symmetricalsounds wrote:yeah and when that happens i'll be happy to take the leap back and use some dialup to get onto some geeky dudes BBSjobbanaught wrote: sad but true, give it another 20 years and most stuff on the net will be proprietary
Oh damn, here comes the google wave! Thanks for the thread by the way, always nice to see different perspectives.nowaysj wrote: How do you make a skrillex bass
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests