headphones vs. monitors

hardware, software, tips and tricks
Forum rules
By using this "Production" sub-forum, you acknowledge that you have read, understood and agreed with our terms of use for this site. Click HERE to read them. If you do not agree to our terms of use, you must exit this site immediately. We do not accept any responsibility for the content, submissions, information or links contained herein. Users posting content here, do so completely at their own risk.

Quick Link to Feedback Forum
User avatar
lyons238
Permanent Vacation
Posts: 1725
Joined: Tue May 04, 2010 12:04 am
Location: USA - Providence, RI

Re: headphones vs. monitors

Post by lyons238 » Tue May 10, 2011 4:14 am

iamjoncannon wrote:
lyons238 wrote: also bass response on headphones isn't ideal. it just cant be possible because bass waves are long and require distance to hear them properly.
and also the stereo image will be more noticeable on headphones because each side is isolated from the other.

but think about it: are you doing a track for headphones or for a club system? do you want to hear all the little details or the total mix? how often have you been in a club and thought 'wow i love how crisp the eq on that hi hat is'?

i have a decent set of both and find that stuff i do on headphones only sometimes sounds good on my monitors, but anything i do on my monitors will sound good on my headphones...if that makes any sense...
yup this is a slight addition to what i said and this is exactly how i feel.
New WIP (not much I know)
Soundcloud
Delayed WIP
Soundcloud
Image
Dark Matter

User avatar
lysergene
Posts: 102
Joined: Mon May 09, 2011 9:36 am

Re: headphones vs. monitors

Post by lysergene » Tue May 10, 2011 2:10 pm

Here are a couple of articles:

http://www.soundonsound.com/sos/jan07/a ... phones.htm

http://www.soundonsound.com/sos/jan10/a ... phones.htm


....and I totally agree about hearing loss, I'm in the position now where I'm getting on going ear infections due to headphone and earplug use. It's not all about how quiet the music is either, anything which is in or on the ear causes trouble, inflamation, wax production and the inevitable infection imo.

G

User avatar
Krakkemikkig
Posts: 40
Joined: Sat Jan 22, 2011 9:21 am

Re: headphones vs. monitors

Post by Krakkemikkig » Thu May 12, 2011 2:31 pm

KRK KNS6400



I got them myself, there so sick, and the bass is insane. KRK is the shit man. You wont regret them!

VirtualMark
Posts: 1821
Joined: Tue Aug 03, 2010 12:15 am
Location: UK

Re: headphones vs. monitors

Post by VirtualMark » Thu May 12, 2011 2:51 pm

I would recommend against buying anything from Shure. I have some SRH750DJ headphones, and they're only about 9 months old. The ear covers are cracked and split, and the joints that rotate are cracking and splitting. It said on their website that they're ultra durable, i'd say they're flimsy!

Contacted support, they said to send them in, i just can't be bothered with it as i use them everyday. I'll just get a more expensive pair from another company.

User avatar
lysergene
Posts: 102
Joined: Mon May 09, 2011 9:36 am

Re: headphones vs. monitors

Post by lysergene » Thu May 12, 2011 10:24 pm

The Beyerdynamic DT 990 Pro headphones have had good reviews here:

http://www.headphoneinfo.com/content/Be ... rmance.htm

According to this site they perform similarly to the (very expensive) Sennheiser HD800 cans. In my experience it doesn't matter if you spend a grand or a few hundred, provided you know how music should sound on the headphones/monitors by comparing professional mixes to your own. I've been using cheap Sony headphones for about ten years (the same pair :oops: ) and I know exactly what's going on in the mix because I know the headphones. For very cheap cans I can't fault Sony there. And they're solid still, metal frames etc. (although I can't vouch for newer models).

Don't trust reviews and descriptions provided by the manufacturer of the product. Independent reviews are better, provided they are actually independent.

Try a load out in a music store, find out which ones you want and then go online to buy them :W: In my experience music store people add zero value to the products with their arrogant and clearly sales targeted based bull s**t!

G

User avatar
Debaser1
Posts: 660
Joined: Mon Sep 27, 2010 11:41 pm
Location: Birmingham UK

Re: headphones vs. monitors

Post by Debaser1 » Thu May 12, 2011 11:43 pm

I could babble on for days about this.

My monitors are out of action for a while so its headphones all the way at the min. I really like how you can pick up fine details on headphones, but it wont give you an accurate overall frequency response like speakers. After all, we make music like this to be played out, so play it the fuck out - unless youre at a Swedish silent rave.
Soundcloud - DEEP, EVIL, BASS
I AM RUFA http://www.soundcloud.com/rufaproducer
kaiori breathe wrote:Congratulations, you've discovered how to move from one chord to another...

Psythe
Posts: 79
Joined: Mon May 03, 2010 7:48 pm

Re: headphones vs. monitors

Post by Psythe » Fri May 13, 2011 12:33 am

lysergene wrote:The Beyerdynamic DT 990 Pro headphones have had good reviews here:

http://www.headphoneinfo.com/content/Be ... rmance.htm

According to this site they perform similarly to the (very expensive) Sennheiser HD800 cans. In my experience it doesn't matter if you spend a grand or a few hundred, provided you know how music should sound on the headphones/monitors by comparing professional mixes to your own. I've been using cheap Sony headphones for about ten years (the same pair :oops: ) and I know exactly what's going on in the mix because I know the headphones. For very cheap cans I can't fault Sony there. And they're solid still, metal frames etc. (although I can't vouch for newer models).

Don't trust reviews and descriptions provided by the manufacturer of the product. Independent reviews are better, provided they are actually independent.

Try a load out in a music store, find out which ones you want and then go online to buy them :W: In my experience music store people add zero value to the products with their arrogant and clearly sales targeted based bull s**t!

G


I have the beyer dynamic DT 770 and they are really good for production. Just use the headphones then burn the track to a cd and throw it in the car see the results.

philly
Posts: 57
Joined: Fri Dec 25, 2009 10:05 am

Re: headphones vs. monitors

Post by philly » Fri May 13, 2011 2:34 am

Kodachrome wrote:
jrisreal wrote:You can get the Shure SRH440's or the Sennheiser HD280's

I have the Sennheisers and my friend has the Shures and unfortunately their both over $100 (unless you look on google shopping ;-) )
Haha I've been meaning to buy a pair of 280's. If I posted a pic of my monitoring situation I'd get laughed off the forums.
Let me guess....
Image
:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:

hifi
Posts: 3328
Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 6:54 am

Re: headphones vs. monitors

Post by hifi » Fri May 13, 2011 2:47 am

i would rather have a good pair of cans before good quality monitors. good pair of headphones with a good frequency response would be all you need temporarily while you can save up to get some nice speakers.

User avatar
Debaser1
Posts: 660
Joined: Mon Sep 27, 2010 11:41 pm
Location: Birmingham UK

Re: headphones vs. monitors

Post by Debaser1 » Fri May 13, 2011 9:22 am

Hypefiend wrote:i would rather have a good pair of cans before good quality monitors. good pair of headphones with a good frequency response would be all you need temporarily while you can save up to get some nice speakers.

+1+1+1+1
Soundcloud - DEEP, EVIL, BASS
I AM RUFA http://www.soundcloud.com/rufaproducer
kaiori breathe wrote:Congratulations, you've discovered how to move from one chord to another...

macc
Posts: 1737
Joined: Wed Aug 27, 2008 11:56 pm
Location: http://www.scmastering.com , maac at subvertmastering dot com
Contact:

Re: headphones vs. monitors

Post by macc » Fri May 13, 2011 1:16 pm

I'd trust headphones over any monitors in a completely untreated small room any day.

Headphones are fantastic BUT it is a completely different way of listening. If you are going to use them, do a LOT (!!!!) of listening to proper stuff with them too.
www.scmastering.com / email: macc at subvertmastering dot com

tactilezero
Posts: 14
Joined: Sun Feb 14, 2010 6:04 pm

Re: headphones vs. monitors

Post by tactilezero » Fri May 13, 2011 7:36 pm

Actually, ive been in a club and have said similar things(the few times ive been sober in clubs ;-) ) . I have a pair of HD280's and they are quite good, and its very much possible to get a great sounding mix out of them. As far as the extreme stereo separation problem that comes with producing with headphones, their are plugins you can just chuck into your master channel that can solve that problem.
http://www.112db.com/redline/monitor/ thats one of them, its pretty much the next best thing to having decent monitors if your producing with cans. But also by no means a replacement for them. Their are other ones similar, but ive gotten the best results out of that one.

User avatar
lysergene
Posts: 102
Joined: Mon May 09, 2011 9:36 am

Re: headphones vs. monitors

Post by lysergene » Sat May 14, 2011 2:45 pm

tactilezero wrote:Actually, ive been in a club and have said similar things(the few times ive been sober in clubs ;-) ) . I have a pair of HD280's and they are quite good, and its very much possible to get a great sounding mix out of them. As far as the extreme stereo separation problem that comes with producing with headphones, their are plugins you can just chuck into your master channel that can solve that problem.
http://www.112db.com/redline/monitor/ thats one of them, its pretty much the next best thing to having decent monitors if your producing with cans. But also by no means a replacement for them. Their are other ones similar, but ive gotten the best results out of that one.
Yeah the SOS article I first posted a link to discusses the way that around 40% of a left speaker is still heard through your right ear and vice versa. The sound is in front of you, rather than comming from inside your head.

All my tracks are made using headphones and I have a listen on speakers every now and then to make sure the stuff with stereo imaging isn't too quiet which tends to happen a lot. The stereo imaging seems louder in headphones.

If I had a nightclub system in me yard I'd use that but I don't :(

Anyway - I tried the Beyers against my old Sonys today and they are similar but have a more extended bass end, so exactly what I was after. The guy at the store said the 770's are good too.

Open back/semi open back headphones are best for production, that's worth mentioning too.

dubesteppe
Posts: 626
Joined: Thu Apr 07, 2011 6:41 am

Re: headphones vs. monitors

Post by dubesteppe » Sat May 14, 2011 9:59 pm

jrisreal wrote:bass response....well theyre flat frequency so the bass isnt like HOLY CRAP THIS IS AWESOME!!!!!!! but the plus is that you'd be hearing the audio AS IT IS instead of being colored by a built-in EQ curve like most headphones...and they DO have bass, so don't worry about that. But for the sennheisers, best performance is with a headphone amp.

EDIT: For all headphones, best performance is with the headphone amp...I say you should get the Shures man, theyre cheaper and pretty much same as good
correct me if im wrong but wouldnt having an amplifier be bad since im using these as monitors?
Cheeky wrote:Ohmicides amazing, but its a bit like massive to me. Its like having a huge dick and not knowing what to do with it so it flops out of your shorts when your walking, it takes a while to buy the right pair of shorts to control the dick.
Cheeky wrote:Having 4 DAWs is like having four dicks, you only really need the one

User avatar
jrisreal
Posts: 4312
Joined: Thu Mar 03, 2011 6:48 am
Location: the TARDIS

Re: headphones vs. monitors

Post by jrisreal » Sat May 14, 2011 10:15 pm

no, especially monitor headphones often require some extra power to work their best...so you should definitely get an amp...i dont have one, but ive used them once
...in my opinion
Image
ImageImageImage

User avatar
lysergene
Posts: 102
Joined: Mon May 09, 2011 9:36 am

Re: headphones vs. monitors

Post by lysergene » Mon May 16, 2011 12:55 pm

Can you get decent headphones and an amp for under 100 bucks? :?

If the headphones have an impedance of 250ohms or less you should be OK without an amp. If the impedance isn't stated in the technical specifications then you probably have consumer headphones which are loud enough anyway. With this kind of budget you could end up with anything. I'd recommend Sony headphones. For a little more you could get some Beyers or Sennheisers.

G

User avatar
Kodachrome
Posts: 882
Joined: Wed Mar 23, 2011 12:13 am

Re: headphones vs. monitors

Post by Kodachrome » Tue May 17, 2011 9:17 am

philly wrote:
Kodachrome wrote:
jrisreal wrote:You can get the Shure SRH440's or the Sennheiser HD280's

I have the Sennheisers and my friend has the Shures and unfortunately their both over $100 (unless you look on google shopping ;-) )
Haha I've been meaning to buy a pair of 280's. If I posted a pic of my monitoring situation I'd get laughed off the forums.
Let me guess....
Image
:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:
Lmao you have no idea how close to the truth you really are..
:corndance:
http://soundcloud.com/kodachrome
Soundcloud
faust.dtc wrote:Ive always considered myself a failed ninja

User avatar
the dub lemon
Posts: 580
Joined: Sat Apr 04, 2009 6:58 pm
Location: Wales
Contact:

Re: headphones vs. monitors

Post by the dub lemon » Tue May 17, 2011 9:26 am

If you're looking for something decent below 100 bucks it's going to be a struggle.

For the headphones route I use Beyerdynamic DT990 which are really good which are over $100 but under $200. Very highly recommended!

User avatar
lysergene
Posts: 102
Joined: Mon May 09, 2011 9:36 am

Re: headphones vs. monitors

Post by lysergene » Wed May 18, 2011 9:54 pm

I have those Beyers too now - decent!

Locked

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests