cubase or fl loops

hardware, software, tips and tricks
Forum rules
By using this "Production" sub-forum, you acknowledge that you have read, understood and agreed with our terms of use for this site. Click HERE to read them. If you do not agree to our terms of use, you must exit this site immediately. We do not accept any responsibility for the content, submissions, information or links contained herein. Users posting content here, do so completely at their own risk.

Quick Link to Feedback Forum
User avatar
wascal
Posts: 1197
Joined: Sun Mar 19, 2006 6:30 pm
Location: Bristol

Re: cubase or fl loops

Post by wascal » Mon Apr 30, 2007 11:35 am

mission wrote:wots the easyr 1 2 have i got fl loops but i been hearing that cubase is better from a lot of people plz say wot u think about them



is there any point in me getin cubase ??????????
Cubase SE does all you could possibly need unless you're using 64 channels and not bouncing down. I've never had issues with it on my mac.

User avatar
pompoushit
Posts: 107
Joined: Tue Mar 27, 2007 8:13 pm

Post by pompoushit » Mon Apr 30, 2007 2:54 pm

there are other decent alternatives... like Synapse Orion, which is a Reason/FL kinda hybrid, really cool program, fast&easy, handles vst and its builtx-n plug-ins are dope. Another one which worth looking at is Mackie Tracktion... I'm totally in love with this cutie. It's approach is similar to Ableton in the sense that it tries something new, they tried to create a sequencer where you don't need various windows like mixer, fx etc, but everything is done on one screen. And it has sexy built-in fx too.

Fl is perfect for electronic music production (with features not to be found elsewhere like the almighty granulizer) if you can get used to its sequencer... if not u still can rewire it or use it as a vst in any sequencer. I have a few friends who got their stuff released on various labels and they use only fruity with a bunch of vsts.

User avatar
mission
Posts: 25
Joined: Tue Apr 24, 2007 10:33 am
Contact:

Post by mission » Wed May 09, 2007 9:43 am

thax ill just get erm all and when i got erm ill post bk on and tell u all wot 1 better init

ruckus.dk
Posts: 65
Joined: Thu Nov 30, 2006 7:06 am
Location: Wellyzville, New Zealand
Contact:

Post by ruckus.dk » Wed May 09, 2007 9:36 pm

j_trex wrote:doesn't matter what you use. important is that you should handle your program at the fullest.
some ppl make sick tunes on reason some on fl some on cubase and other on logic depends on you what you like the most.
for real.

doesnt matter what program or sequencer you write in, as long as you know what you are doing with it.,

Ive been using reason for about 2 1/2 years now and can do anyting you can do with VSTs using only reason machines....

s'all about ..... LEARNING THE PROGRAM YOU USE! ! ! !

User avatar
tempest
Posts: 2258
Joined: Wed May 09, 2007 12:00 am
Location: NSW, Australia

Post by tempest » Thu May 10, 2007 5:01 am

deff fruity for an introduction to production / instant gratification

User avatar
pompoushit
Posts: 107
Joined: Tue Mar 27, 2007 8:13 pm

Post by pompoushit » Thu May 10, 2007 6:27 pm

ruckus.dk wrote:
j_trex wrote:doesn't matter what you use. important is that you should handle your program at the fullest.
some ppl make sick tunes on reason some on fl some on cubase and other on logic depends on you what you like the most.
for real.

doesnt matter what program or sequencer you write in, as long as you know what you are doing with it.,

Ive been using reason for about 2 1/2 years now and can do anyting you can do with VSTs using only reason machines....

s'all about ..... LEARNING THE PROGRAM YOU USE! ! ! !
yeah reason really is underrated sometimes though I doubt that you would be able to produce a wavetable or additive synth sound in reason... But still it has its advantages, you are not tempted to get newer and newer shit and you really learn to use your soft. And there are quite a few big names who are still using reason and their stuff gets released.

ruckus.dk
Posts: 65
Joined: Thu Nov 30, 2006 7:06 am
Location: Wellyzville, New Zealand
Contact:

Post by ruckus.dk » Thu May 10, 2007 9:21 pm

not so sure about the dubstep producers out there but i know alot of the DnB cats are still rolln' with reason, along with other software obviously but reason is still the platform...

if you wanna hear some damn good production ALL done on reason, apart from mastering check out
Nanotek
just singed to the freak family all the way from little ol' New Zealand...

Littlefoot
Posts: 3478
Joined: Sun Oct 22, 2006 2:45 pm
Location: Nottingham
Contact:

Post by Littlefoot » Fri May 11, 2007 12:09 am

in the grand scale of things, cubase isnt fiddly at all IMO.

if you want fiddly, get Logic!

I use Reason 3.0 for my dubs, then Cubase or Logic to mix it when its created
Subsequent Mastering - http://www.subsequentmastering.com
Online Mastering Service
(LOL GURLZ, Geiom, Dexplicit, Bass Clef, Lost Codes Audio, Car Crash Set recordings)

Locked

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests