Lulzsec vs 4chan (anon)

Off Topic (Everything besides dubstep)
Forum rules
Please read and follow this sub-forum's specific rules listed HERE, as well as our sitewide rules listed HERE.

Link to the Secret Ninja Sessions community ustream channel - info in this thread
knell
Secret Ninja Moderator
Posts: 8752
Joined: Thu Nov 12, 2009 5:51 pm
Location: ↑ ↑ ↓ ↓ ← → ← → B A
Contact:

Re: Lulzsec vs 4chan (anon)

Post by knell » Wed Jun 22, 2011 4:56 am

Kodachrome wrote: So some of us know about internet culture/trends. No shame in that.
i know right, if you're reasonably intelligent you only need to hear about / look at something once before you know what it's about...

so Hibbie, i guess by your standards you're now a nerd and should feel embarrassed for the simple reason that you stumbled across a random fact and can now participate in the discussion :corntard:

pompende
Posts: 2897
Joined: Tue Nov 08, 2005 11:57 am
Location: 38104
Contact:

Re: Lulzsec vs 4chan (anon)

Post by pompende » Wed Jun 22, 2011 5:28 am

pkay wrote:
AxeD wrote:Just read chan and lulzsec aren't at 'war' at all though.
yeah over the weekend it seems they agreed to share targets and stop fucking with each others video games lol
just to clarify:
when you started this thread on friday
LulzSec wrote:To confirm, we aren't going after Anonymous. 4chan isn't Anonymous to begin with, and /b/ is certainly not the whole of 4chan. True story.
its a fun fable... cant trust the #mediafags tho

butt jolokia
Permanent Vacation
Posts: 1008
Joined: Sat Oct 30, 2010 9:16 pm

Re: Lulzsec vs 4chan (anon)

Post by butt jolokia » Wed Jun 22, 2011 5:40 am

The strength of the intelligence community's infrastructure doesn't depend on its fucking public website. :lol:

knell
Secret Ninja Moderator
Posts: 8752
Joined: Thu Nov 12, 2009 5:51 pm
Location: ↑ ↑ ↓ ↓ ← → ← → B A
Contact:

Re: Lulzsec vs 4chan (anon)

Post by knell » Wed Jun 22, 2011 5:58 am

looks like lulzsec has adopted shitty dubstep with lame rap over it as its theme song -.-

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7YoDt-MxhHg

butt jolokia
Permanent Vacation
Posts: 1008
Joined: Sat Oct 30, 2010 9:16 pm

Re: Lulzsec vs 4chan (anon)

Post by butt jolokia » Wed Jun 22, 2011 6:02 am

knell wrote:looks like lulzsec has adopted shitty dubstep with lame rap over it as its theme song -.-
old bryce whitey crraccker. smh

User avatar
nowaysj
Posts: 23281
Joined: Fri Sep 18, 2009 4:11 am
Location: Mountain Fortress

Re: Lulzsec vs 4chan (anon)

Post by nowaysj » Wed Jun 22, 2011 6:48 am

They're coming 4 u!

F.B.I. Seizes Web Servers, Knocking Sites Offline

http://bits.blogs.nytimes.com/2011/06/2 ... s-offline/
The F.B.I. seized Web servers in a raid on a data center early Tuesday, causing several Web sites, including those run by the New York publisher Curbed Network, to go offline.

The raid happened at 1:15 a.m. at a hosting facility in Reston, Va., used by DigitalOne, which is based in Switzerland, the company said. The F.B.I. did not immediately respond to a request for comment on the raid.

In an e-mail to one of its clients on Tuesday afternoon, DigitalOne’s chief executive, Sergej Ostroumow, said: “This problem is caused by the F.B.I., not our company. In the night F.B.I. has taken 3 enclosures with equipment plugged into them, possibly including your server — we cannot check it.”

Mr. Ostroumow said that the F.B.I. was only interested in one of the company’s clients but had taken servers used by “tens of clients.”

He wrote: “After F.B.I.’s unprofessional ‘work’ we can not restart our own servers, that’s why our Web site is offline and support doesn’t work.” The company’s staff had been working to solve the problem for the previous 15 hours, he said.

Mr. Ostroumow said in response to e-mailed questions that it was not clear if the issues would be resolved by Wednesday.

A government official who declined to be named said earlier in the day that the F.B.I. was actively investigating the Lulz Security group and any affiliated hackers. The official said the F.B.I. had teamed up with other agencies in this effort, including the Central Intelligence Agency and cybercrime bureaus in Europe.

Mr. Ostroumow declined to name the company targeted by the F.B.I. and said that he did not know why it had drawn their interest. It was also unclear why the agents took more servers with them than they sought, he said.

The sites of the Curbed Network, including popular blogs covering real estate, restaurants and other topics, were all unavailable Tuesday evening. Lockhart Steele, Curbed’s president, said his team realized that the company’s sites were down at around 3 a.m. and contacted DigitalOne. After initially declining to say what had happened, DigitalOne explained that the F.B.I. had raided the data center, Mr. Steele said.

“Our servers happened to be in with some naughty servers,” he said, adding that his sites were not the target of the raid. Curbed is working to get its sites back online, probably by Wednesday.

The raid also affected a server used by Instapaper, a popular service that saves articles for later reading. Marco Arment, Instapaper’s founder, said he lost contact with a server hosted by DigitalOne early on Tuesday. Instapaper’s Web site is still operating but has slowed somewhat. Mr. Arment said he had not heard from DigitalOne or law enforcement, and had no reason to believe that Instapaper was a target of the raid.

Pinboard, a bookmarking site, was operating on a backup server and some of its features were turned off, a post on its site said.

DigitalOne provided all necessary information to pinpoint the servers for a specific I.P. address, Mr. Ostroumow said. However, the agents took entire server racks, perhaps because they mistakenly thought that “one enclosure is = to one server,” he said in an e-mail.

DigitalOne had no employees on-site when the raid took place. The data center operator, from which DigitalOne leases space, passed along the information about the raid three hours after it started with the name of the agent and a phone number to call.

Before learning of the raid, Mr. Ostroumow, who is in Switzerland with the rest of his team, thought the problem was a technical glitch.
Join Me
DiegoSapiens wrote:oh fucking hell now i see how on point was nowaysj
Soundcloud

User avatar
drokkr
Posts: 7128
Joined: Mon Jun 02, 2008 9:57 pm
Location: Cork, Ireland
Contact:

Re: Lulzsec vs 4chan (anon)

Post by drokkr » Wed Jun 22, 2011 8:52 am

I was just about to post that ^

Surely, they could have just copied the information the need from the servers. The sooner cloud computing gets it's shit together the better imo.

User avatar
bigfootspartan
Posts: 796
Joined: Wed Jun 16, 2010 4:16 pm
Location: Calgary, AB, Canada

Re: Lulzsec vs 4chan (anon)

Post by bigfootspartan » Wed Jun 22, 2011 7:54 pm

knell wrote:looks like lulzsec has adopted shitty dubstep with lame rap over it as its theme song -.-

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7YoDt-MxhHg
:lol: i can just imagine some pale twiggy bastards sitting in some basement: so guys, what should we attack next!? We need something th at the bitches would be impressed by.... Dubstep is popular with the bitches....

Hide your dubs! Lulsec will snatch them and spit their twiggy vitreous all over them!

User avatar
HamCrescendo
Posts: 3101
Joined: Thu Jul 17, 2008 9:11 pm
Location: Manchester/London

Re: Lulzsec vs 4chan (anon)

Post by HamCrescendo » Wed Jun 22, 2011 8:37 pm


User avatar
kingGhost
Posts: 2123
Joined: Sun Mar 28, 2010 11:30 pm
Location: charlotte, nc
Contact:

Re: Lulzsec vs 4chan (anon)

Post by kingGhost » Thu Jun 23, 2011 2:26 am

yea gonna be hilarious til they throw their nerdy asses in jail.

big al needs a new girlfriend ya heard
Electric_Head wrote:It is in fact my semen.

deadly_habit
Posts: 22980
Joined: Tue Oct 24, 2006 3:41 am
Location: MURRICA

Re: Lulzsec vs 4chan (anon)

Post by deadly_habit » Thu Jun 23, 2011 9:41 am

ah crackers tweeting, gonna be funny when they get busted
calling themselves hackers minus maybe a few members lol
wanna join em filestube loic and be a tool

User avatar
hugh
Posts: 4164
Joined: Wed Jan 23, 2008 12:00 pm
Contact:

Re: Lulzsec vs 4chan (anon)

Post by hugh » Thu Jun 23, 2011 6:54 pm

I remember reading some articles in the independent a while back about this dude who was obsessed with hacking for no real reason. He would hack into the CIA and Pentagon and have a really good poke around. Eventually he was caught but it turned out he had severe autistic problems and basically lived for the rush of anonymous hacking. I think this sort of psyche is very common in the hacking community. They are just kinda different people.
Lost Dreams - Final
Soundcloud
Ipso Facto - Final
Soundcloud

User avatar
dubmatters
Posts: 974
Joined: Fri Apr 30, 2010 2:33 pm

Re: Lulzsec vs 4chan (anon)

Post by dubmatters » Thu Jun 23, 2011 7:27 pm

hugh wrote:I remember reading some articles in the independent a while back about this dude who was obsessed with hacking for no real reason. He would hack into the CIA and Pentagon and have a really good poke around. Eventually he was caught but it turned out he had severe autistic problems and basically lived for the rush of anonymous hacking. I think this sort of psyche is very common in the hacking community. They are just kinda different people.
You mean Gary Mckinnon?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gary_McKinnon
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/technology/4715612.stm
maybe his magical jew carpenter compelled him to speak out

User avatar
wormcode
Posts: 6659
Joined: Mon Jul 20, 2009 7:43 am
Location: htx/atx

Re: Lulzsec vs 4chan (anon)

Post by wormcode » Thu Jun 23, 2011 7:40 pm

Gary wanted to show us the unedited NASA images.

User avatar
nowaysj
Posts: 23281
Joined: Fri Sep 18, 2009 4:11 am
Location: Mountain Fortress

Re: Lulzsec vs 4chan (anon)

Post by nowaysj » Thu Jun 23, 2011 7:46 pm

And where is any kind of proof of anything he claims to have seen?
Join Me
DiegoSapiens wrote:oh fucking hell now i see how on point was nowaysj
Soundcloud

User avatar
fractal
Mako
Posts: 12133
Joined: Tue Apr 18, 2006 5:58 pm
Location: emerald city, cascadia

Re: Lulzsec vs 4chan (anon)

Post by fractal » Thu Jun 23, 2011 9:56 pm

nonexistent of course
sub.wise:.
slow down
epochalypso wrote:man dun no bout da 'nuum

User avatar
wormcode
Posts: 6659
Joined: Mon Jul 20, 2009 7:43 am
Location: htx/atx

Re: Lulzsec vs 4chan (anon)

Post by wormcode » Thu Jun 23, 2011 10:30 pm

Well that's just what he said he wanted.
Anything he had is evidence now. He said the images each took over an hour to load because of huge uncompressed files and a bad connection probably from routing through networks. He said there were whole stations set up just for editing out questionable stuff ("UFOs") in the pics.

There's lots of videos and even some documentaries on the "edited/airbrushed" NASA images. I believe they edit them, like anyone releasing government related things would do, like how they edit military bases from aerial views etc. Whether or not there's something sinister or UFO related I don't know, but IMO it's more likely the editing out of military technology or info they don't want in foreign hands.
Last edited by wormcode on Thu Jun 23, 2011 10:42 pm, edited 1 time in total.

knell
Secret Ninja Moderator
Posts: 8752
Joined: Thu Nov 12, 2009 5:51 pm
Location: ↑ ↑ ↓ ↓ ← → ← → B A
Contact:

Re: Lulzsec vs 4chan (anon)

Post by knell » Thu Jun 23, 2011 10:36 pm

i don't know about him, but personally, if i had hacked into NASA, and found anything related to UFOs/Free energy, i would've take a million screenshots, downloaded the images and re-hosted them on every server i could find.


but that's just me.

User avatar
nowaysj
Posts: 23281
Joined: Fri Sep 18, 2009 4:11 am
Location: Mountain Fortress

Re: Lulzsec vs 4chan (anon)

Post by nowaysj » Thu Jun 23, 2011 10:39 pm

You are also not a depressed pot smoking assburger hacker...or are you? :o
Join Me
DiegoSapiens wrote:oh fucking hell now i see how on point was nowaysj
Soundcloud

knell
Secret Ninja Moderator
Posts: 8752
Joined: Thu Nov 12, 2009 5:51 pm
Location: ↑ ↑ ↓ ↓ ← → ← → B A
Contact:

Re: Lulzsec vs 4chan (anon)

Post by knell » Thu Jun 23, 2011 10:41 pm

:buggery:

*runs*

Locked

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests