AudioGL (New 3D DAW)

ToxicBass · Post by **ToxicBass** » Sun Jun 26, 2011 8:48 pm

I'd love to try this out! Looks sweet

nowaysj · Post by **nowaysj** » Sun Jun 26, 2011 8:56 pm

collective wrote:You have seen max do things without even knowing max was doing it.

May have heard it, but I def haven't seen it

And am pretty aware of what Max can do, but will not be scratching that surface. I've got too many surfaces left unscratched as is

Sparxy · Post by **Sparxy** » Sun Jun 26, 2011 8:59 pm

Wow! Really impressive! Imagine the kind of machine you'd need to run that smoothly!

symmetricalsounds · Post by **symmetricalsounds** » Sun Jun 26, 2011 9:02 pm

Sparxy wrote:Wow! Really impressive! Imagine the kind of machine you'd need to run that smoothly!

well according to the video it will run comfortably on "most modern laptops"

BevOh · Post by **BevOh** » Mon Jun 27, 2011 12:06 am

tron daw?

Lectric · Post by **Lectric** » Mon Jun 27, 2011 12:34 am

NEXT LEVEL SYNTHESIS :hp:

amphibian · Post by **amphibian** » Mon Jun 27, 2011 12:56 am

"Just because you can, doesn't mean you should" - is the quote that resonates with me right now after watching that. A lot of processing just for the UI, which imho is an absolute waste. Would love to see if the UI is customizable however and see how they've tackled organizational challenges.

legend4ry · Post by **legend4ry** » Mon Jun 27, 2011 2:48 am

amphibian wrote:"Just because you can, doesn't mean you should" - is the quote that resonates with me right now after watching that. A lot of processing just for the UI, which imho is an absolute waste. Would love to see if the UI is customizable however and see how they've tackled organizational challenges.

Pretty much how I feel.

cloud capture · Post by **cloud capture** » Mon Jun 27, 2011 2:58 am

dayum

bigfootspartan · Post by **bigfootspartan** » Mon Jun 27, 2011 4:32 am

legend4ry wrote:
amphibian wrote:"Just because you can, doesn't mean you should" - is the quote that resonates with me right now after watching that. A lot of processing just for the UI, which imho is an absolute waste. Would love to see if the UI is customizable however and see how they've tackled organizational challenges.

Pretty much how I feel.

+1. For me a DAW is simply a tool to record what's in my brain (or hands if I'm just improving) to a digital format, as easily as possible. I could be wrong, but this looks ridiculously complicated, although it's impressive that he used a single tone and modulated it to make that tune.

nowaysj · Post by **nowaysj** » Mon Jun 27, 2011 4:49 am

bigfootspartan wrote:For me a Woman is simply a tool to receive what's in my loins (or hands if I'm just improving) in a biological format, as easily as possible.

Wait, wut? How about a little

?

Ldizzy · Post by **Ldizzy** » Mon Jun 27, 2011 5:53 am

thought about something very similar last time i was REALLY high.

dogmancar · Post by **dogmancar** » Mon Jun 27, 2011 5:44 pm

This looks cool but kinda pointless. I hate to be one of those "what we have right now works just fine" type of guys, but...

ComfiStile · Post by **ComfiStile** » Thu Aug 11, 2011 6:40 pm

Can you imagine looking through this for why one of your sounds isn't playing like it should? Fucking nightmare.

-[2]DAY_- · Post by **-[2]DAY_-** » Thu Aug 11, 2011 6:59 pm

what we have works just fine.

symmetricalsounds · Post by **symmetricalsounds** » Thu Aug 11, 2011 7:01 pm

-[2]DAY_- wrote:what we have works just fine.

could've said that before multitrack recording was invented, get a band in a room and record them it works just fine.

Phase Down · Post by **Phase Down** » Thu Aug 11, 2011 8:11 pm

I want 3d automation thrown at me please! Just wait till I get this beta with virtual reality glasses.

-[2]DAY_- · Post by **-[2]DAY_-** » Thu Aug 11, 2011 8:24 pm

symmetricalsounds wrote:
-[2]DAY_- wrote:what we have works just fine.
could've said that before multitrack recording was invented, get a band in a room and record them it works just fine.

that didn't work just fine, it had obvious limitations.
This is just a fancier mouse trap.

nowaysj · Post by **nowaysj** » Fri Aug 12, 2011 4:59 am

Naw, I really think this is about techno (like the archetypical techno that finds manifestations in various genres, without itself being the captial T echno). Process oriented music making, this is just a new variety, or a wrinkle in the form of techno process. A way. Think it looks cool, if I had unlimited time and cycles, I would be up in that bitch (like every other bitch).

amphibian · Post by **amphibian** » Fri Aug 12, 2011 5:35 am

symmetricalsounds wrote:
-[2]DAY_- wrote:what we have works just fine.
could've said that before multitrack recording was invented, get a band in a room and record them it works just fine.

My thoughts exactly.

AudioGL (New 3D DAW)

Re: AudioGL (New 3D DAW)

Re: AudioGL (New 3D DAW)

Re: AudioGL (New 3D DAW)

Re: AudioGL (New 3D DAW)

Re: AudioGL (New 3D DAW)

Re: AudioGL (New 3D DAW)

Re: AudioGL (New 3D DAW)

Re: AudioGL (New 3D DAW)

Re: AudioGL (New 3D DAW)

Re: AudioGL (New 3D DAW)

Re: AudioGL (New 3D DAW)

Re: AudioGL (New 3D DAW)

Re: AudioGL (New 3D DAW)

Re: AudioGL (New 3D DAW)

Re: AudioGL (New 3D DAW)

Re: AudioGL (New 3D DAW)

Re: AudioGL (New 3D DAW)

Re: AudioGL (New 3D DAW)

Re: AudioGL (New 3D DAW)

Re: AudioGL (New 3D DAW)

Who is online