Jonu wrote:Victims of consumer capitalism.seckle wrote:All of you would be thinking different if that was your sofa store burned to the ground, or your electronics store pilfered. Its got fuck all to do with politics when you've lost your entire source of income because sone kids needed flatscreens and xboxes.
epochalypso wrote:man dun no bout da 'nuum
gayest ninja post everjugo wrote:
spoken like a true closet case.hugh wrote:
gayest ninja post ever
...well, it got worse for him- he had his head cut off! hasn't always been a monarchy here.seckle wrote:Uk rioting through the ages....
http://english.aljazeera.net/indepth/op ... 55535.html
Didn't know that in the 1600's, rioting forced King Charles the 1st to abandon London. Heavy...
Riots in 1743 against Gin Taxes and other legislation to control the Gin Craze, principally the Gin Act 1736; rioting was fuelled by consumption of the drink itself
everything supermassive raver does is embarrassing - that's the pointhugh wrote:nah I would imagine most people would agree that video was terribly embarassing.
We used to be excellent at rioting. Read a pretty exhaustive History of London (Peter Ackroyd) this year and the stuff on the Gordon Riots is amazing. That's the last time I reckon Britons rioted for essentially "no reason" (no political motive, I mean). They burned down Newgate Prison* and The Clink by London Bridge. That was much larger numbers than this though... tens of thousands.Mr Hyde wrote:...well, it got worse for him- he had his head cut off! hasn't always been a monarchy here.seckle wrote:Uk rioting through the ages....
http://english.aljazeera.net/indepth/op ... 55535.html
Didn't know that in the 1600's, rioting forced King Charles the 1st to abandon London. Heavy...
yeah, plenty of riots in London, the best one:Riots in 1743 against Gin Taxes and other legislation to control the Gin Craze, principally the Gin Act 1736; rioting was fuelled by consumption of the drink itself
nowaysj wrote:I wholeheartedly believe that Michael Brown's mother and father killed him.
I don't understand, are you supposed to think 'that was shit' but then chuckle in some post ironic fashion or something? Genuinely puzzled by that videojugo wrote:everything supermassive raver does is embarrassing - that's the pointhugh wrote:nah I would imagine most people would agree that video was terribly embarassing.
i'm not sure what it's about either - he just does it to be strange i thinkcapo ultra wrote:I don't understand, are you supposed to think 'that was shit' but then chuckle in some post ironic fashion or something? Genuinely puzzled by that videojugo wrote:everything supermassive raver does is embarrassing - that's the pointhugh wrote:nah I would imagine most people would agree that video was terribly embarassing.
OMG. The rioting has actually been severe enough to cause sd5 to break from conventional phrasing! It truly has much greater repercussions than anything that has gone on before!sd5 wrote:How come the rioters are being so quickly & (relatively) harshly dealt with, when the financial oligarchy, whose actions have been far more damaging to society, still escape legal censure?
This haste & lack of proper consideration in the dealing with the disgruntled may cater to the clammering fearful but how does it foster confidence in the fairness of the justice system?
Disempowered masses go down swiftly...avaricious elite escape responsibility, yet again.
It is redolent of the solution found in C18th England for the dispossessed & unemployed (as wealth began concentrating in the hands of industrialists) who turned to petty crime...send em as slaves to the USA & Australia. Not so easy this time.
Is British democracy more concerned with stability than equity & justice?
Shit just got real!!kay wrote:OMG. The rioting has actually been severe enough to cause sd5 to break from conventional phrasing! It truly has much greater repercussions than anything that has gone on before!sd5 wrote:How come the rioters are being so quickly & (relatively) harshly dealt with, when the financial oligarchy, whose actions have been far more damaging to society, still escape legal censure?
This haste & lack of proper consideration in the dealing with the disgruntled may cater to the clammering fearful but how does it foster confidence in the fairness of the justice system?
Disempowered masses go down swiftly...avaricious elite escape responsibility, yet again.
It is redolent of the solution found in C18th England for the dispossessed & unemployed (as wealth began concentrating in the hands of industrialists) who turned to petty crime...send em as slaves to the USA & Australia. Not so easy this time.
Is British democracy more concerned with stability than equity & justice?
noam wrote:son
let me break this down for ya
mustard = yellow
HP = brown
Ketchup = red
if ya fuck with the program, someone's gona get hurt... feel me
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests
