My firm belief was that a dub or dubplate ( correct me if I'm wrong ) was an exclusive track or remix pressed on an acetate or vinyl disc of 12, 10 or 7 inches in diameter. To me, a dub was indistinguishable from the physical format on which these pieces were pressed.
Now I don't know anymore !
From what I gather, the terms dub and dubplate seem to be more and more synonymous with track. The expression : " I have a new dub ", to a lot of people will mean : " I have a new track ". " New dubs on myspace " means " new track on myspace ". Dub section of the forum... tune section of the forum. Ad infinitum... Now, the format on which the tracks are presented, be it mp3, cd, Flac, etc. seems of little importance.
Why this shift in the use of the terms " dub " or " dubplate " ?
What I am seeing is a shift in semantics due, in part to the depragmatisation of the dub " ethos ".
What do I mean exactly by " depragmatisation " of the dub ethos ?
The dub " ethos " seems to be ( of couse it might be a false induction of my part ) less and less rooted in those specific practices ( cutting exclusive tracks, versions, giving them to dj's, etc. ) that made the " original " dub culture what it was. It is somewhat becoming a ghost, a mere abstraction of it's former self. How we use the terms dub and dubplate seems to be a reflection of that...
I wouldn't be able to explain the why and the how of depragmatisation ( the fact that the dub ethos is less and less rooted in certain practices ), but I do know that the technological paradigm in which we live in isn't helping things. Why cut a plate, if I can drop wavefiles, mp3's regardless of bitrate, in the dance ? It would be just a waste of money and time. I know that's how a lot of dj's think. This technological paradigm, to me, and in this specific context ( the dubstep scene ), serves as an impulsion towards depragmatisation.
Thoughts ?
Ok, I'm going back in the studio.
