Top down vs bottom up. Decklyn's mad psychedelic rant

hardware, software, tips and tricks
Forum rules
By using this "Production" sub-forum, you acknowledge that you have read, understood and agreed with our terms of use for this site. Click HERE to read them. If you do not agree to our terms of use, you must exit this site immediately. We do not accept any responsibility for the content, submissions, information or links contained herein. Users posting content here, do so completely at their own risk.

Quick Link to Feedback Forum
User avatar
decklyn
Posts: 1551
Joined: Sun Feb 25, 2007 3:29 am
Location: Toronto, Canada

Top down vs bottom up. Decklyn's mad psychedelic rant

Post by decklyn » Thu May 03, 2007 4:54 am

This is something I've been thinking about recently.
Especially when I talk to other producers, and we talk about "boundaries" and undefining them in dubstep, to me this is one of the most important boundaries to overcome that has really allowed me to explore sounds in directions that I wouldn't otherwise concieve, further undefining my "process" in the studio so that the shit that I come up with is creative and pushing my own personal boundries constantly.

Someone brought up the concept of top down vs bottom up at school in a presentation on nano technology. In top down, you build a machine that builds another smaller machine that builds another smaller until you're at the nano level. In bottom up you manipulate things at the atomic level until you've built that which you have intended.

I'm going to change those models a bit tho. We'll say top down is where you have an idea of where you want to end up, and you go through the processes to get your original idea as best represented as possible.

We usually do this on a micro scale when we're making music. We beat box some sounds and then try to represent them or we just "hear" where things should go.

I've started thinking about the alternative to that, and how to get outside of those usual processes. That is, moving "atoms" around until a machine is built. Hear what I"m saying? There is an alternative. Just jostle shit around until it sounds like you're getting closer to the machine that you're ultimately hoping to end up with. Things start to gel, and you communicate with the piece - certainly you have inklings as to where things should sort of be located, but do it pretty randomly and without an idea of where you want to be as much as is possible, so that if while jostling around a piece it gells somewhere unexpected, then stick with it.

Remember both processes are to end up as the same thing - a good piece of music. They're just two different approaches to the same end. I hope that made some sort of sense! it does to me, and I've had some pleasing results (well, pleasing to me at the very least :-P)

As some ideas take form, then you've got a foundation of incredibly fresh ideas, which you otherwise would not have come up with from which to build things as you normally would.

I think we all do this naturally a bit. It's always a bit of both. I don't know. just a crazy psychedelic rant for you!
Image
Decklyn Dublog - Rants, Raves and Tutorials - http://www.decklyn.com
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
http://www.soundcloud.com/decklyn
Mar 18th: Seba Remix
Soundcloud

misk
Posts: 5525
Joined: Wed Nov 01, 2006 7:40 am
Location: East Coast Soon!
Contact:

Post by misk » Thu May 03, 2007 6:33 am

interesting theories and ideas there, decklyn. I find, that i tend to not have a specific idea in mind when i start a track. I start with drums, and get them where i like them, and then i let the track make itself, based on what i think should go where... at the risk of sounding premadonna, the track comes to me as im working on it.

(it doesnt, by any means, mean that all my tracks are "good"!)

User avatar
tenbucc2
Posts: 191
Joined: Thu Sep 21, 2006 11:14 pm
Location: Los Angeles

Re: Top down vs bottom up. Decklyn's mad psychedelic rant

Post by tenbucc2 » Fri May 04, 2007 12:23 am

decklyn wrote:I don't know. just a crazy psychedelic rant for you!
I'm diggin' this guy!

Decklyn, if you're ever in LA holla at me... we'll make some PsychedelaStep

User avatar
decklyn
Posts: 1551
Joined: Sun Feb 25, 2007 3:29 am
Location: Toronto, Canada

Re: Top down vs bottom up. Decklyn's mad psychedelic rant

Post by decklyn » Fri May 04, 2007 2:07 am

tenbucc2 wrote:
decklyn wrote:I don't know. just a crazy psychedelic rant for you!
I'm diggin' this guy!

Decklyn, if you're ever in LA holla at me... we'll make some PsychedelaStep
werd!
Image
Decklyn Dublog - Rants, Raves and Tutorials - http://www.decklyn.com
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
http://www.soundcloud.com/decklyn
Mar 18th: Seba Remix
Soundcloud

User avatar
subframe
Posts: 662
Joined: Fri Oct 07, 2005 4:43 pm
Location: San Francisco

Post by subframe » Fri May 04, 2007 5:37 pm

Dont' we often do both simultaneously? For myself at least, I start out with some ideas, some beats and basslines and whatever, but along the way, a bunch of possibly-random, or at least unforseeable, things happen.

Those things either sound good or not, and if they do, I go with them.

Thus the final product is a mix of those elements that are premeditated and those that are unexpected.

I do think the randomness is very interesting, and I need to learn how to incorporate it more quickly.

Nice rant, one day soon I'll write down my Theory of Quantum Music :)
maximum disorder is our equilibrium

User avatar
decklyn
Posts: 1551
Joined: Sun Feb 25, 2007 3:29 am
Location: Toronto, Canada

Post by decklyn » Fri May 04, 2007 5:41 pm

subframe wrote:Dont' we often do both simultaneously? For myself at least, I start out with some ideas, some beats and basslines and whatever, but along the way, a bunch of possibly-random, or at least unforseeable, things happen.

Those things either sound good or not, and if they do, I go with them.

Thus the final product is a mix of those elements that are premeditated and those that are unexpected.

I do think the randomness is very interesting, and I need to learn how to incorporate it more quickly.

Nice rant, one day soon I'll write down my Theory of Quantum Music :)
Dope any rant involving quantum theory I'm down for.
Image
Decklyn Dublog - Rants, Raves and Tutorials - http://www.decklyn.com
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
http://www.soundcloud.com/decklyn
Mar 18th: Seba Remix
Soundcloud

two oh one
Posts: 2786
Joined: Mon Nov 20, 2006 5:30 am
Location: Croydon ---> Los Angeles
Contact:

Post by two oh one » Fri May 04, 2007 6:37 pm

Is this just a tweak/noodle/jam until something happens VS writing a song with an overall master-plan-type-thing?

I tend to do the latter, otherwise I tend to end up with something pleasing yet a bit aimless, meandering and ultimately empty. I need to have a plan and I attack things like I do a painting - Working vague to specific. A sketch, a lay in, values and finally little details.

Working from tweaky noodles upwards works for some people, though. :)
Image
Image
Ahier wrote: I like to push lego up cat bums

User avatar
parson
Posts: 11311
Joined: Mon Jul 31, 2006 6:26 am
Location: ATX
Contact:

Post by parson » Fri May 04, 2007 8:41 pm

quantum consciousness wrote:Brain activity correlating with perception apparently occurs too late (150 to 500 msec after impingement on our sense organs) to account for actions initiated or completed within 100 msec!

These include*:
• Preparation of spoken words responding to heard speech (Normal conversation!)

• Analysis of sensory inputs and emotional content

• Choice, planning & execution of voluntary acts

• Hitting a baseball pitched at 90 mph

• etc.

Nonetheless, subjectively (i.e. we feel as though) we perceive and respond to these perceptions consciously.
Consequently, subjective feeling of conscious control of these behaviors is illusion—they are merely: nonconscious reflexive responses

Accordingly, consciousness is epiphenomenal and we
are (as T.H. Huxley said) “conscious automata, helpless spectators”.
http://www.quantumconsciousness.org/bleeptalk.htm

mrhope
Posts: 114
Joined: Thu Feb 22, 2007 8:26 pm
Location: Underground
Contact:

Post by mrhope » Fri May 04, 2007 11:44 pm

With me, I do a bit of both. However much of the time my main song idea gets altered due to limitations of my...

* concentration
* playing skills
* cpu speed
* sample library
* RAM
* programs
* synthesizer
* mixing abilities
* monitors
* patience

So really every song is not Plan A, B or C, but Plan X, Y, or Z.
It would be easier if I didn't have those limitations but it's still
possible to make good songs and feel good about them.
Hear|download my music from http://SoundClick.com/DeathlessDodecagon

misk
Posts: 5525
Joined: Wed Nov 01, 2006 7:40 am
Location: East Coast Soon!
Contact:

Post by misk » Sat May 05, 2007 7:30 am

the studio is a physical extension of your Self. only when you realize this, can you get out of your own way, and let creativity happen.



:? ..... 8)

User avatar
tempest
Posts: 2258
Joined: Wed May 09, 2007 12:00 am
Location: NSW, Australia

Post by tempest » Fri May 11, 2007 2:46 am

yes sensei.

User avatar
ludofuzz
Posts: 86
Joined: Mon Jun 26, 2006 9:31 pm
Location: Leeds
Contact:

Post by ludofuzz » Wed May 23, 2007 8:31 pm

sensei.....i'd say more like acid :o

User avatar
victorxray
Posts: 99
Joined: Wed Apr 25, 2007 9:57 am
Location: AU
Contact:

Post by victorxray » Wed May 23, 2007 9:28 pm

I gotta say, sometimes I work both ways. Sometimes I get an idea for a beat or a tune in my head (usually either in the shower or while walking) and then have to translate it to my production. Other times, I just sit down at the computer, at the keyboard, or with my bass guitar, and just noodle a bit and see if something just comes out.

Probably the best tracks that I wrote tho come out the second way. Or start with the first process and suddenly some inspiration veers it off its original path.

nonseq
Posts: 77
Joined: Fri Oct 07, 2005 1:10 pm
Location: Amsterdam

Re: Top down vs bottom up. Decklyn's mad psychedelic rant

Post by nonseq » Sun May 27, 2007 1:17 am

decklyn wrote:Someone brought up the concept of top down vs bottom up at school in a presentation on nano technology. In top down, you build a machine that builds another smaller machine that builds another smaller until you're at the nano level. In bottom up you manipulate things at the atomic level until you've built that which you have intended.
Sounds like 'bootstrapping':

As an allusion to lifting oneself up by one's own bootstraps, the term bootstrapping means using a special process to perform a task that one would be unable to do in general.

* Bootstrapping (computing), starting a computer or building complex tools after building simple tools that allow for the creation of the more complex tools. Shortened to booting to describe the process of starting up a computer.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bootstrapping

whineo
Posts: 1736
Joined: Fri Jan 19, 2007 1:32 pm
Location: ox

Post by whineo » Fri Jun 01, 2007 12:00 pm

Personally (from a creative side rather than mixdown mastering)..
I try to allow the tune to evolve on its own.
most of the time I hear a sample or rhythm and use that as a starting point. Or I just hear a snare or Kick, stick it in the sequencer and see where it takes me.
The best tunes tend to make themselves i find.

If I have a finished tune in my head from listening to a loop it will never turn out like that because im always going to be restricted by production abilities at the time.

So without sounding gay, Im definately a bottom up.

User avatar
gravious
>>>>>>>><<<<<<<<
Posts: 2380
Joined: Fri Oct 14, 2005 8:15 pm
Location: The Side of The Clyde
Contact:

Post by gravious » Fri Jun 01, 2007 1:14 pm

I find I usually make the best tracks when I have a 'concept' for the tune rather than an idea of what it should sound like...

Hard to explain though.

Occasionally I get so frustrated with a tune thats not going anywhere that I just select all the notes and hit "randomise".

It generally leaves you with a load of gibberish, but surprisingly often you can pluck out one riff or sound and build on it.

escapee planes
Posts: 198
Joined: Thu May 31, 2007 7:33 pm
Location: BRIGHTON, UK
Contact:

Post by escapee planes » Fri Jun 01, 2007 4:29 pm

I think I'm a bottum up sort of guy. I never really know how the track will end up when I start.
I just put atoms togther, a bit like making a baby.

<b>Have sex</b> (Turn on computer, load up software)

<b>Wait 9 months</b> (ideas grow, basslines wobble, baby starts kicking, finished in about 1 month)

<b>Give birth</b> (Finished track played out in Club) :D

User avatar
thomas edison
Posts: 306
Joined: Mon Jun 19, 2006 11:26 am
Location: rottadam

Post by thomas edison » Sun Jun 03, 2007 4:15 pm

i just got into producing, and usually do things at random

sometimes just click about and keep it that way if its hot, some things i want a certain way but my experience and knowledge isnt letting me so you cant do the stuff you want all the time, so i dont think about a tune when i start

User avatar
gravious
>>>>>>>><<<<<<<<
Posts: 2380
Joined: Fri Oct 14, 2005 8:15 pm
Location: The Side of The Clyde
Contact:

Post by gravious » Mon Jun 04, 2007 8:48 am

Escapee Planes wrote: <b>Have sex</b> (Turn on computer, load up software)
Terrifying glance into the future right here.

forensix (mcr)
Posts: 4688
Joined: Fri Apr 07, 2006 1:58 pm
Location: Manchester
Contact:

Post by forensix (mcr) » Mon Jun 04, 2007 11:30 am

gravious wrote:
Escapee Planes wrote: <b>Have sex</b> (Turn on computer, load up software)
Terrifying glance into the future right here.
Truly

in response to original post; most of the time i start from blank although when i do have some kind of melody and masterplan i always go off on a tangent

Locked

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests