Dist. ST Holdings remove all their labels from Spotify

debate, appreciation, interviews, reviews (events or releases), videos, radio shows
Locked
wub
Posts: 34156
Joined: Tue Feb 26, 2008 3:11 pm
Location: Madrid
Contact:

Dist. ST Holdings remove all their labels from Spotify

Post by wub » Wed Nov 16, 2011 12:26 pm

http://www.stholdings.co.uk/2011/11/16/ ... o-napster/

"STHoldings can confirm that we have taken the decision to remove all STHoldings distributed content from the following music services, Spotify, Simfy, Rdio & Napster.

Despite these services offering promotion to many millions of music listeners we have concerns that these services cannibalise the revenues of more traditional digital services. These concerns are confirmed in our own accounts and a recent study by NPD Group and NARM

As a distributor we have to do what is best for our labels. The majority of which do not want their music on such services because of the poor revenues and the detrimental affect on sales. Add to that, the feeling that their music loses it’s specialness by it’s exploitation as a low value/free commodity. Quoting one of our labels “Let’s keep the music special, fuck Spotify

All the labels we represent have been given the choice to have their music to Spotify, Simfy, Rdio & Napster. As of today (16.11.11) from the 238 labels we distribute, 4 have expressed that they would like to be on these services."


Full list of labels here - http://www.stholdings.co.uk/label_list/

Of note - Deep Medi, Chestplate, DMZ, Swamp81, Wheel & Deal etc etc

User avatar
arktrix45hz
Posts: 1609
Joined: Tue Sep 22, 2009 9:41 pm

Re: Dist. ST Holdings remove all their labels from Spotify

Post by arktrix45hz » Wed Nov 16, 2011 12:31 pm

Good...spotify pay a pittance per play. I know D-Bridge was talking about removing all Exit content from there via Twitter the other week. Hopefully more labels and artists follow suit.
http://45hertzofbass.com- Guest mixes and interviews with the likes of Danny Scrilla/Baitface/Mishva and more.

http://facebook.com/45hz
http://soundcloud.com/arktrix
Ask for AIM

User avatar
Naan_Bread
Posts: 879
Joined: Sat May 28, 2011 2:24 pm

Re: Dist. ST Holdings remove all their labels from Spotify

Post by Naan_Bread » Wed Nov 16, 2011 2:20 pm

So I'll just listen to it on Grooveshark then...

User avatar
Mr Hyde
Posts: 2148
Joined: Tue Feb 22, 2011 11:37 am
Location: SE26
Contact:

Re: Dist. ST Holdings remove all their labels from Spotify

Post by Mr Hyde » Wed Nov 16, 2011 2:53 pm

I find it a strange argument of almost all artists/labels: 'we're all about the music' is at odd with 'this service gets it to a big audience but we don't make enough money from it and it gets to people too easily so we won't allow it' ....actually not all about the music then? quite a lot about being a bit elitist and making the most money from the music as possible.

stormtrace
Posts: 110
Joined: Thu Mar 22, 2007 6:23 pm

Re: Dist. ST Holdings remove all their labels from Spotify

Post by stormtrace » Wed Nov 16, 2011 3:08 pm

Mr Hyde wrote:I find it a strange argument of almost all artists/labels: 'we're all about the music' is at odd with 'this service gets it to a big audience but we don't make enough money from it and it gets to people too easily so we won't allow it' ....actually not all about the music then? quite a lot about being a bit elitist and making the most money from the music as possible.

I don't think that is fair Mr Hyde. The problem with spotify is just that they pay out 0.006p per unique stream. Which frankly is disgraceful considering they purport themselves to be a legal platform who redistributes the advertising revenue.

It doesn't mean that all artists are money grabbing it just means that they are after a fair deal. Just because spotify offers a big platform doesn't mean that the musicians deserve to be taken advantage of.

Pedro Sánchez
Posts: 7727
Joined: Wed Feb 06, 2008 12:15 pm
Location: ButtonMoon

Re: Dist. ST Holdings remove all their labels from Spotify

Post by Pedro Sánchez » Wed Nov 16, 2011 3:09 pm

These streaming services and most digital download services are just dangling carrots to small labels, there is no benefit, unless you want a broader audience (I use that term loosely) which won't be achieved by just having your catalogue on them without shit loads of promotion. They are not actually democratizing music distribution as the myth would have you believe, they are just introducing more shit into the market place.
Genevieve wrote:It's a universal law that the rich have to exploit the poor. Preferably violently.

User avatar
pdomino
Posts: 5643
Joined: Mon Apr 24, 2006 2:54 pm

Re: Dist. ST Holdings remove all their labels from Spotify

Post by pdomino » Wed Nov 16, 2011 3:12 pm

I agree with them, there's nothing wrong with exclusivity and making money from music of course.

User avatar
wormcode
Posts: 6659
Joined: Mon Jul 20, 2009 7:43 am
Location: htx/atx

Re: Dist. ST Holdings remove all their labels from Spotify

Post by wormcode » Wed Nov 16, 2011 3:24 pm

It's not just independent artists they screw over, I remember some figures a year or 2 ago where Lady Gaga was payed only like 150US or so for over 1 million streams of a song. That's jokes. Small labels have nothing to gain from that I think. Plenty of other places to get exposure, and Spotify isn't even in every country anyway, plus there's software to pirate from spotify itself.

http://torrentfreak.com/id-rather-be-ra ... fy-090813/
Swedish artist and composer Magnus Uggla has launched a scathing attack on the owners of Spotify. After discovering that Sony BMG is a shareholder and after receiving virtually no payment from his music being played there, he has withdrawn his tracks from the service declaring, “I’d rather be raped by The Pirate Bay.”

User avatar
Mr Hyde
Posts: 2148
Joined: Tue Feb 22, 2011 11:37 am
Location: SE26
Contact:

Re: Dist. ST Holdings remove all their labels from Spotify

Post by Mr Hyde » Wed Nov 16, 2011 3:38 pm

stormtrace wrote:
Mr Hyde wrote:I find it a strange argument of almost all artists/labels: 'we're all about the music' is at odd with 'this service gets it to a big audience but we don't make enough money from it and it gets to people too easily so we won't allow it' ....actually not all about the music then? quite a lot about being a bit elitist and making the most money from the music as possible.

I don't think that is fair Mr Hyde. The problem with spotify is just that they pay out 0.006p per unique stream. Which frankly is disgraceful considering they purport themselves to be a legal platform who redistributes the advertising revenue.

It doesn't mean that all artists are money grabbing it just means that they are after a fair deal. Just because spotify offers a big platform doesn't mean that the musicians deserve to be taken advantage of.
Fair enough, its more the fact that artists and labels always seem to beat around the bush and keep this 'we're all about the music' sort of line. Just come out and say- we want to be elitist and make as much money as possible.
pdomino wrote:I agree with them, there's nothing wrong with exclusivity and making money from music of course.
This is very true, and I do sort of agree with them too. Although am more of the mind that you need to offer something better to make the ££, if business is getting taken away by streaming services then you need to sell your tunes at a higher quality format, or physical formats, or make money from live shows. (there was a whole 'radio is killing the music industry' and after that 'taping is killing the music industry'- neither did)

User avatar
pdomino
Posts: 5643
Joined: Mon Apr 24, 2006 2:54 pm

Re: Dist. ST Holdings remove all their labels from Spotify

Post by pdomino » Wed Nov 16, 2011 3:50 pm

Mr Hyde wrote:
stormtrace wrote:
Mr Hyde wrote:I find it a strange argument of almost all artists/labels: 'we're all about the music' is at odd with 'this service gets it to a big audience but we don't make enough money from it and it gets to people too easily so we won't allow it' ....actually not all about the music then? quite a lot about being a bit elitist and making the most money from the music as possible.

I don't think that is fair Mr Hyde. The problem with spotify is just that they pay out 0.006p per unique stream. Which frankly is disgraceful considering they purport themselves to be a legal platform who redistributes the advertising revenue.

It doesn't mean that all artists are money grabbing it just means that they are after a fair deal. Just because spotify offers a big platform doesn't mean that the musicians deserve to be taken advantage of.
Fair enough, its more the fact that artists and labels always seem to beat around the bush and keep this 'we're all about the music' sort of line. Just come out and say- we want to be elitist and make as much money as possible.
pdomino wrote:I agree with them, there's nothing wrong with exclusivity and making money from music of course.
This is very true, and I do sort of agree with them too. Although am more of the mind that you need to offer something better to make the ££, if business is getting taken away by streaming services then you need to sell your tunes at a higher quality format, or physical formats, or make money from live shows. (there was a whole 'radio is killing the music industry' and after that 'taping is killing the music industry'- neither did)
Same, sort of agree, I'm sure all formats are already covered and other formats don't really work anymore. Not 'killing' an industry but making a noticeable dent.


User avatar
collige
Posts: 6316
Joined: Mon Jan 26, 2009 4:50 am
Location: Maryland
Contact:

Re: Dist. ST Holdings remove all their labels from Spotify

Post by collige » Wed Nov 16, 2011 10:35 pm

Mr Hyde wrote:I find it a strange argument of almost all artists/labels: 'we're all about the music' is at odd with 'this service gets it to a big audience but we don't make enough money from it and it gets to people too easily so we won't allow it' ....actually not all about the music then? quite a lot about being a bit elitist and making the most money from the music as possible.
I don't think it's an issue of not making enough than it is of not wanting to be taken advantage of. Spotify's model does not work in favor of artists, or even fairly.
Statement of Intent VIP / Sahaquiel v4 single out now on UK Trends.
Soundcloud
Soundcloud | Bandcamp | Mixcloud | Twitter

joeki
Posts: 3265
Joined: Mon Jan 05, 2009 3:32 pm
Location: Hest Side, Belgium

Re: Dist. ST Holdings remove all their labels from Spotify

Post by joeki » Wed Nov 16, 2011 10:45 pm

Spotify sucks any way. A stupid program that doesn't know how to read tags or get correct artwork for legally downloaded releases on your PC. ALso, it doesn't play FLAC. It's completely useless for me.

Locked

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests