wow never thought of using sidechains with ur mid ranges n stuff... i think im gonna contruct a track with tons of different sidechains n stuff.. but i wont get too lost in the chains hahaa.RandoRando wrote:His snares always have that 200hz pop that cuts through the mix, I think he sidechains his midrange and subbass to he snare. Maybe making them sound larger than they actually are?
Skrillex assistance. NO, this is not about bass or leads...
Forum rules
By using this "Production" sub-forum, you acknowledge that you have read, understood and agreed with our terms of use for this site. Click HERE to read them. If you do not agree to our terms of use, you must exit this site immediately. We do not accept any responsibility for the content, submissions, information or links contained herein. Users posting content here, do so completely at their own risk.
Quick Link to Feedback Forum
By using this "Production" sub-forum, you acknowledge that you have read, understood and agreed with our terms of use for this site. Click HERE to read them. If you do not agree to our terms of use, you must exit this site immediately. We do not accept any responsibility for the content, submissions, information or links contained herein. Users posting content here, do so completely at their own risk.
Quick Link to Feedback Forum
-
- Posts: 120
- Joined: Mon Apr 18, 2011 3:55 am
- Location: Edmonton, Alberta Canada.
Re: Skrillex assistance. NO, this is not about bass or leads
Swaggr wrote:sucks ass posting at the end of the page! gotten like 1 person to give feedback on this song
Re: Skrillex assistance. NO, this is not about bass or leads
Soundcloud
This is my first attempt at making a "Skrillex" sounding snare. Let me know what you think.
This is my first attempt at making a "Skrillex" sounding snare. Let me know what you think.
Re: Skrillex assistance. NO, this is not about bass or leads
i honestly think uve described what i HATE about his tunes... poor post prod...Specimen-Yarp wrote:wow never thought of using sidechains with ur mid ranges n stuff... i think im gonna contruct a track with tons of different sidechains n stuff.. but i wont get too lost in the chains hahaa.RandoRando wrote:His snares always have that 200hz pop that cuts through the mix, I think he sidechains his midrange and subbass to he snare. Maybe making them sound larger than they actually are?
it really simply sounds like he oversquashes the master output and has his snares playing WAY TOO LOUD in the mix...
thats it. + the overall weird distortion is also explainable by poor compression technique.
Sharmaji wrote:2011: the year of the calloused-from-overuse facepalm
Re: Skrillex assistance. NO, this is not about bass or leads
you just gave me something to try.RandoRando wrote:His snares always have that 200hz pop that cuts through the mix, I think he sidechains his midrange and subbass to he snare. Maybe making them sound larger than they actually are?

Re: Skrillex assistance. NO, this is not about bass or leads
Not bad. Not enough pop or crunch IMO. More compression. Mess with the attack and release. If you're layering bus them all and compress them together. And get out an EQ and boost the shit out of 200hzMRocchio wrote:Soundcloud
This is my first attempt at making a "Skrillex" sounding snare. Let me know what you think.
Re: Skrillex assistance. NO, this is not about bass or leads
I will try that, thanks.Sparxy wrote:Not bad. Not enough pop or crunch IMO. More compression. Mess with the attack and release. If you're layering bus them all and compress them together. And get out an EQ and boost the shit out of 200hzMRocchio wrote:Soundcloud
This is my first attempt at making a "Skrillex" sounding snare. Let me know what you think.
Re: Skrillex assistance. NO, this is not about bass or leads
also, when using NY compression - the compressor on the return track will work wonders in you make the threshold VERY low. so the compressor starts working at lower volumes. high ratio, long attack, fast release, will work. but finding the sweet spot for your threshold is what it's all about.MRocchio wrote:I will try that, thanks.Sparxy wrote:Not bad. Not enough pop or crunch IMO. More compression. Mess with the attack and release. If you're layering bus them all and compress them together. And get out an EQ and boost the shit out of 200hzMRocchio wrote:Soundcloud
This is my first attempt at making a "Skrillex" sounding snare. Let me know what you think.
Re: Skrillex assistance. NO, this is not about bass or leads
That's exactly how to nail the sound.. The only thing is, I think it's genius post production.Ldizzy wrote:i honestly think uve described what i HATE about his tunes... poor post prod...Specimen-Yarp wrote:wow never thought of using sidechains with ur mid ranges n stuff... i think im gonna contruct a track with tons of different sidechains n stuff.. but i wont get too lost in the chains hahaa.RandoRando wrote:His snares always have that 200hz pop that cuts through the mix, I think he sidechains his midrange and subbass to he snare. Maybe making them sound larger than they actually are?
it really simply sounds like he oversquashes the master output and has his snares playing WAY TOO LOUD in the mix...
thats it. + the overall weird distortion is also explainable by poor compression technique.
A good mix and master aren't always clean, it's about lending the mix to the style of production and all of Skrillex's tunes do that perfectly.
Skrillex would not sound as good or be as popular if it wasn't for that over limited sound.
Ascian - Expecting Resistance
Soundcloud
Metric - Twilight Galaxy (Ascian Remix)
Soundcloud
Click here for production video tutorials>
Soundcloud
Metric - Twilight Galaxy (Ascian Remix)
Soundcloud
Click here for production video tutorials>

- FluidMoShun
- Posts: 366
- Joined: Sat Nov 20, 2010 6:39 pm
- Location: Northa Bawston, MA
Re: Skrillex assistance. NO, this is not about bass or leads
somebody shine the skrillex spotlight, this man needs skrillex assistance 

Re: Skrillex assistance. NO, this is not about bass or leads
we have similar yet diverging opinions ...Ascian wrote:That's exactly how to nail the sound.. The only thing is, I think it's genius post production.Ldizzy wrote:i honestly think uve described what i HATE about his tunes... poor post prod...Specimen-Yarp wrote:wow never thought of using sidechains with ur mid ranges n stuff... i think im gonna contruct a track with tons of different sidechains n stuff.. but i wont get too lost in the chains hahaa.RandoRando wrote:His snares always have that 200hz pop that cuts through the mix, I think he sidechains his midrange and subbass to he snare. Maybe making them sound larger than they actually are?
it really simply sounds like he oversquashes the master output and has his snares playing WAY TOO LOUD in the mix...
thats it. + the overall weird distortion is also explainable by poor compression technique.
A good mix and master aren't always clean, it's about lending the mix to the style of production and all of Skrillex's tunes do that perfectly.
Skrillex would not sound as good or be as popular if it wasn't for that over limited sound.
the reason why this type of poorly skilled self mastering gimmicky technique works is because of three things... 1) the loudness war... 2) the very poor playback system a lot of people are exposed to... i.e. as it was well described somewhere on these forums, the reason why these kids dig the midrange cack over the heavy low end stuff is because they listen to youtube videos thru shitty ass laptop speakers and trendy ass wesc earplugs... a very few people have actually LISTENED to/felt 20-50 hz properly in their lives... (something u often experience only once u start mixing in clubs)... 3) the urge and stressed out feeling it puts into his tunes... distortion can be good (e.g. : dave pensado admitted using distortion over christina aguilera's vocals to make it sound like she's screaming a bit too loud.. psychological stuff)...
so yes, in a sense skrillex mixing/mastering skills is a testimony of an era we live in... but techically speaking and logically speaking and even emotionally speaking... it is not the best possible way of mixing a tune... and there is a way to retain all of these feelings with a WAY MORE efficient mixing style... to me it is REALLY like mcdonalds in away.. what ur telling me is "well the people love it... and i think its genius"... to that i say... "yeah, it might just be the most popular/sold/mass-appealing food ever... so might as well call it the best food ever made... but ... u know.."
im not stupid, when i play on a shitty venue with dirty drugged out kids with expectations of getting smashed hard in the face... ill push every skrillex remix there is... and ill FEEL IT.. and shout in the microphone... and all.. but if u give me a real low end response, ill make a crowd feel WAY CRAZIER.. with stuff that has much much more depth... i dont hate some brostep tunes out of a desire to be someone else then everybody.. they just lack in sonic qualities i think are worth the dislike if absent..
and i aint talking about his production skills, which in my sense are more then okay even if they're located way deep into the cheezy spectrum (i dig cheeze)... its all good
skrillex is like the trousers i wear the day before a date so i dont have to wear it on a date...
Sharmaji wrote:2011: the year of the calloused-from-overuse facepalm
Re: Skrillex assistance. NO, this is not about bass or leads
Really interesting post. I agree to a certain extent. The worst part about this post is that Skrillex isn't even the worst culprit of squashing the life out of tunes.Ldizzy wrote:we have similar yet diverging opinions ...Ascian wrote:That's exactly how to nail the sound.. The only thing is, I think it's genius post production.Ldizzy wrote:i honestly think uve described what i HATE about his tunes... poor post prod...Specimen-Yarp wrote:wow never thought of using sidechains with ur mid ranges n stuff... i think im gonna contruct a track with tons of different sidechains n stuff.. but i wont get too lost in the chains hahaa.RandoRando wrote:His snares always have that 200hz pop that cuts through the mix, I think he sidechains his midrange and subbass to he snare. Maybe making them sound larger than they actually are?
it really simply sounds like he oversquashes the master output and has his snares playing WAY TOO LOUD in the mix...
thats it. + the overall weird distortion is also explainable by poor compression technique.
A good mix and master aren't always clean, it's about lending the mix to the style of production and all of Skrillex's tunes do that perfectly.
Skrillex would not sound as good or be as popular if it wasn't for that over limited sound.
the reason why this type of poorly skilled self mastering gimmicky technique works is because of three things... 1) the loudness war... 2) the very poor playback system a lot of people are exposed to... i.e. as it was well described somewhere on these forums, the reason why these kids dig the midrange cack over the heavy low end stuff is because they listen to youtube videos thru shitty ass laptop speakers and trendy ass wesc earplugs... a very few people have actually LISTENED to/felt 20-50 hz properly in their lives... (something u often experience only once u start mixing in clubs)... 3) the urge and stressed out feeling it puts into his tunes... distortion can be good (e.g. : dave pensado admitted using distortion over christina aguilera's vocals to make it sound like she's screaming a bit too loud.. psychological stuff)...
so yes, in a sense skrillex mixing/mastering skills is a testimony of an era we live in... but techically speaking and logically speaking and even emotionally speaking... it is not the best possible way of mixing a tune... and there is a way to retain all of these feelings with a WAY MORE efficient mixing style... to me it is REALLY like mcdonalds in away.. what ur telling me is "well the people love it... and i think its genius"... to that i say... "yeah, it might just be the most popular/sold/mass-appealing food ever... so might as well call it the best food ever made... but ... u know.."
im not stupid, when i play on a shitty venue with dirty drugged out kids with expectations of getting smashed hard in the face... ill push every skrillex remix there is... and ill FEEL IT.. and shout in the microphone... and all.. but if u give me a real low end response, ill make a crowd feel WAY CRAZIER.. with stuff that has much much more depth... i dont hate some brostep tunes out of a desire to be someone else then everybody.. they just lack in sonic qualities i think are worth the dislike if absent..
and i aint talking about his production skills, which in my sense are more then okay even if they're located way deep into the cheezy spectrum (i dig cheeze)... its all good
skrillex is like the trousers i wear the day before a date so i dont have to wear it on a date...
I've bought Circus tunes recently that are literally squashed to fuck, you can hear that its squashed its so bad. The mastering is terrible and it actually sounds like shit. If you look at the tune's waveform its just a perfect square block of sound, its insane. There's really no need to squash a tune that much!!! its awful!!!
It's perfectly possible to have dynamic range in harder tearout tunes, I don't see why labels are so intent on making their shit so compressed when it sounds so awful.
Re: Skrillex assistance. NO, this is not about bass or leads
lack of professionalism, self mastering.. etc..
these tunes usually dont compete on a real dj set... i always have to scratch them off even if they're really good... cause they're a major letdown energywise... u can't have loud if u dont have soft...
#noimpact
these tunes usually dont compete on a real dj set... i always have to scratch them off even if they're really good... cause they're a major letdown energywise... u can't have loud if u dont have soft...
#noimpact
Sharmaji wrote:2011: the year of the calloused-from-overuse facepalm
Re: Skrillex assistance. NO, this is not about bass or leads
Real talkLdizzy wrote: u can't have loud if u dont have soft...
#noimpact
I completely agree. I've stopped playing certain tunes for the same reason.
Compare any Circus release to any Chestplate release and you'll see the massive distance (mind the pun) between mastering quality
The other thing I don't get is that labels like Circus should have loads of budget, they can afford the best mastering engineers in the world. So why on earth do they do it!?!? It simply doesn't sound good at all

Re: Skrillex assistance. NO, this is not about bass or leads
i kno.
some people are just artistically stupid ... i guess
some people are just artistically stupid ... i guess
Sharmaji wrote:2011: the year of the calloused-from-overuse facepalm
-
- Posts: 18
- Joined: Fri Dec 09, 2011 8:49 am
Re: Skrillex assistance. NO, this is not about bass or leads
This was my attempt. I put a reverb on just the snares, turned the dry/wet to about 25-30% and pumped the decay time to about 6-7 seconds.
Re: Skrillex assistance. NO, this is not about bass or leads
Reverb won't do much dude, it's all about the SAMPLES. Buy the High Rankin Sample Pack and Vengeance Essential House Vol. 2, Layer snares from both, EQ and bounce. Simple. You shouldn't even need to compress them much at all.orangeapplesauce wrote:This was my attempt. I put a reverb on just the snares, turned the dry/wet to about 25-30% and pumped the decay time to about 6-7 seconds.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests